Athlon 64 X2 5800+ vs Xeon L5335

Athlon 64 X2 5800+ vs Xeon L5335 Performance Spectrum

Athlon 64 X2 5800+

2 / 2

1,745

+0.5%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Xeon L5335

4 / 4

1,737

0.0%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Athlon 64 X2 5800+ vs Xeon L5335 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Athlon 64 X2 5800+ vs Xeon L5335: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Athlon 64 X2 5800+

2008

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +4.3% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Costs $150 less on MSRP ($230 MSRP vs $380 MSRP).
✅Delivers 66.0% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 7.6 vs 4.6 PassMark/$ ($230 MSRP vs $380 MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon L5335, which brings 4 cores / 4 threads.
❌78% higher power demand at 89W vs 50W.

Xeon L5335

2007

Why buy it

✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 4 cores / 4 threads.
✅Draws 50W instead of 89W, a 39W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Athlon 64 X2 5800+ across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (1,737 vs 1,745).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 4.6 vs 7.6 PassMark/$ ($380 MSRP vs $230 MSRP).

Quick Answers

So, is Athlon 64 X2 5800+ better than Xeon L5335?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon L5335 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Athlon 64 X2 5800+ is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Athlon 64 X2 5800+ is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 4.3% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Athlon 64 X2 5800+ is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.5% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Athlon 64 X2 5800+ is the better buy right now. Athlon 64 X2 5800+ comes in $150 cheaper on MSRP at $230 MSRP versus $380 MSRP, and it still gives you a 4.3% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 66.0% better value on MSRP (7.6 vs 4.6 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Athlon 64 X2 5800+ makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2008 vs 2007) and more multi-core headroom with 2 cores / 2 threads instead of 4/4. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Athlon 64 X2 5800+ vs Xeon L5335 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Athlon 64 X2 5800+

The Athlon 64 X2 5800+ is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the Brisbane (2007−2008) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 3 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: AM2. Thermal design power (TDP): 89 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 1,745 points. Launch price was $149.

Xeon L5335

The Xeon L5335 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 13 August 2007 (18 years ago). It is based on the Clovertown (2006−2007) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 2 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB L2 Cache. L2 cache: 4 MB (total). Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: LGA771. Thermal design power (TDP): 50 Watt. Memory support: DDR2, DDR3 Depends on motherboard. Passmark benchmark score: 1,737 points. Launch price was $380.

⚡

Processing Power

The Athlon 64 X2 5800+ packs 2 cores / 2 threads, while the Xeon L5335 offers 4 cores / 4 threads — the Xeon L5335 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3 GHz on the Athlon 64 X2 5800+ versus 2 GHz on the Xeon L5335 — a 40% clock advantage for the Athlon 64 X2 5800+. The Athlon 64 X2 5800+ uses the Brisbane (2007−2008) architecture (65 nm), while the Xeon L5335 uses Clovertown (2006−2007) (65 nm). In PassMark, the Athlon 64 X2 5800+ scores 1,745 against the Xeon L5335's 1,737 — a 0.5% lead for the Athlon 64 X2 5800+. L3 cache: 0 kB on the Athlon 64 X2 5800+ vs 8 MB L2 Cache on the Xeon L5335.

Feature	Athlon 64 X2 5800+	Xeon L5335
Cores / Threads	2 / 2	4 / 4+100%
Boost Clock	3 GHz+50%	2 GHz
Base Clock	—	2 GHz
L3 Cache	0 kB	8 MB L2 Cache
L2 Cache	512 kB	4 MB (total)+700%
Process	65 nm	65 nm
Architecture	Brisbane (2007−2008)	Clovertown (2006−2007)
PassMark	1,745	1,737

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Athlon 64 X2 5800+ uses the AM2 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Xeon L5335 uses LGA771 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Athlon 64 X2 5800+	Xeon L5335
Socket	AM2	LGA771
PCIe Generation	PCIe 2.0	PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR2-800	—
Max RAM Capacity	16 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	0	—

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Athlon 64 X2 5800+ was priced at $230, while the Xeon L5335 came in at $380. On launch pricing ($230 vs $380), Athlon 64 X2 5800+ was $150 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Athlon 64 X2 5800+ delivers 7.6 pts/$ vs 4.6 pts/$ for the Xeon L5335 — making the Athlon 64 X2 5800+ the 49.6% better value option.

Feature	Athlon 64 X2 5800+	Xeon L5335
MSRP	$230-39%	$380
Performance per Dollar	7.6+65%	4.6
Release Date	2008	2007

Search Athlon 64 X2 5800+ on Amazon

Search Xeon L5335 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.