Athlon II Neo K145 vs Sempron 145

AMD

Athlon II Neo K145

1 Cores1 Thrd1 WWMax: 1.8 GHz2010
Similar parts
·······
VS
AMD

Sempron 145

1 Cores1 Thrd45 WWMax: 2.8 GHz2010
Similar parts
·······

Athlon II Neo K145 vs Sempron 145 Performance Spectrum

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Athlon II Neo K145 vs Sempron 145 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Athlon II Neo K145 vs Sempron 145: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Athlon II Neo K145

2010

Why buy it

  • +3.9% higher PassMark.
  • Draws 1W instead of 45W, a 44W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Launch MSRP is still $50 MSRP, while Sempron 145 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

Sempron 145

2010

Why buy it

    Trade-offs

    • Lower PassMark (544 vs 565).
    • 4400% higher power demand at 45W vs 1W.

    Quick Answers

    So, is Athlon II Neo K145 better than Sempron 145?
    It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Sempron 145 is ahead with 55.6% higher max boost clock. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Athlon II Neo K145 pulls ahead with 3.9% better PassMark.
    Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
    For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Athlon II Neo K145 is the stronger fit. You are getting 3.9% better PassMark, backed by 1 cores and 1 threads.
    Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
    Athlon II Neo K145 is the better buy right now. Athlon II Neo K145 comes in at an unclear MSRP at $50 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you 3.9% better PassMark. The compromise is that Sempron 145 is still the better pure gaming CPU with 55.6% higher max boost clock. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (11.3 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.
    Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
    Athlon II Neo K145 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting more multi-core headroom with 1 cores / 1 threads instead of 1/1. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

    Athlon II Neo K145 vs Sempron 145 Technical Specifications

    Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

    AMD

    Athlon II Neo K145

    The Athlon II Neo K145 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the Nile (2010) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 1.8 GHz. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: S1. Thermal design power (TDP): 1 MB. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 565 points. Launch price was $149.

    AMD

    Sempron 145

    The Sempron 145 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 1 September 2010 (15 years ago). It is based on the Sargas (2009−2011) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 2.8 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: AM3. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 544 points. Launch price was $95.

    Processing Power

    Both the Athlon II Neo K145 and Sempron 145 share an identical 1-core/1-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 1.8 GHz on the Athlon II Neo K145 versus 2.8 GHz on the Sempron 145 — a 43.5% clock advantage for the Sempron 145. The Athlon II Neo K145 uses the Nile (2010) architecture (45 nm), while the Sempron 145 uses Sargas (2009−2011) (45 nm). In PassMark, the Athlon II Neo K145 scores 565 against the Sempron 145's 544 — a 3.8% lead for the Athlon II Neo K145.

    FeatureAthlon II Neo K145Sempron 145
    Cores / Threads
    1 / 1
    1 / 1
    Boost Clock
    1.8 GHz
    2.8 GHz+56%
    Base Clock
    2.8 GHz
    L3 Cache
    0 kB
    L2 Cache
    1 MB
    1 MB (per core)
    Process
    45 nm
    45 nm
    Architecture
    Nile (2010)
    Sargas (2009−2011)
    PassMark
    565+4%
    544
    🧠

    Memory & Platform

    The Athlon II Neo K145 uses the S1 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Sempron 145 uses AM3 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

    FeatureAthlon II Neo K145Sempron 145
    Socket
    S1
    AM3
    PCIe Generation
    PCIe 2.0
    PCIe 2.0
    Max RAM Speed
    DDR3-1066
    Max RAM Capacity
    4 GB
    RAM Channels
    2
    ECC Support
    No
    PCIe Lanes
    0