Athlon X4 750
VS
A8-7410

Athlon X4 750 vs A8-7410

AMD

Athlon X4 750

4 Cores4 Thrd65 WWMax: 4 GHz2013
VS
AMD

A8-7410

4 Cores4 Thrd2 WWMax: 2.5 GHz2015

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Athlon X4 750 is positioned at rank 611 and the A8-7410 is on rank 494, so the A8-7410 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Athlon X4 750

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
10764%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
10171%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
7385%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
2225%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
1762%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
1542%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
883%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
871%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
793%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
793%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
784%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
763%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
753%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
750%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
743%
#280
Core i7-7820X
MSRP: $599|Avg: $198
99%
#383
Ryzen Threadripper 9980X
MSRP: $4999|Avg: $4999
98%
#384
Ryzen Threadripper 3990X
MSRP: $3990|Avg: $2850
97%
#385
Celeron G4900
MSRP: $42|Avg: $85
96%
#611
Athlon X4 750
MSRP: $95|Avg: $95
100%
#613
A6-3600
MSRP: $95|Avg: $25
99%
#614
Core i7-7740X
MSRP: $339|Avg: $150
99%
#615
Core i3-4130
MSRP: $117|Avg: $55
98%
#617
Pentium G3250T
MSRP: $64|Avg: $30
98%
#619
Core i5-7640X
MSRP: $249|Avg: $85
98%
#620
Athlon II X3 425e
MSRP: $79|Avg: $58
98%
#621
Athlon II X4 640
MSRP: $80|Avg: $15
98%
#622
Celeron G540
MSRP: $42|Avg: $10
97%
#624
Core i5-4590
MSRP: $192|Avg: $51
97%
#625
Celeron G440
MSRP: $37|Avg: $5
97%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar A8-7410

#153
Core i7-1370P
MSRP: $438|Avg: $280
100%
#158
Core i9-13900H
MSRP: $617|Avg: N/A
97%
#482
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
642%
#483
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
633%
#484
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
581%
#485
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
578%
#486
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
573%
#488
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
553%
#489
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
531%
#490
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
530%
#491
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
516%
#494
A8-7410
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Leadership: The Athlon X4 750 delivers superior performance across the board. It outperforms the A8-7410 in both compute-intensive tasks (0.4% faster) and gaming workloads.
InsightAthlon X4 750A8-7410
Gaming
Superior gaming performance
Lower gaming performance
Workstation
Better multi-core power
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price
⚠️ Higher cost ($95)
More affordable ($0)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Richland (2013−2014) / 32 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Carrizo-L (2015) / 28 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

InsightAthlon X4 750A8-7410
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
⚠️ Higher cost ($95)
More affordable ($0)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Athlon X4 750 and A8-7410

AMD

Athlon X4 750

The Athlon X4 750 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the Richland (2013−2014) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.4 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L2 cache: 4 MB. Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: FM2. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-1866. Passmark benchmark score: 2,751 points. Launch price was $149.

AMD

A8-7410

The A8-7410 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Carrizo-L (2015) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 2.5 GHz. L2 cache: 2048 kB. Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: FP4. Thermal design power (TDP): 2 MB. Memory support: DDR3L-1866. Passmark benchmark score: 2,741 points. Launch price was $90.

Processing Power

Both the Athlon X4 750 and A8-7410 share an identical 4-core/4-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 4 GHz on the Athlon X4 750 versus 2.5 GHz on the A8-7410 — a 46.2% clock advantage for the Athlon X4 750 (base: 3.4 GHz vs 2.2 GHz). The Athlon X4 750 uses the Richland (2013−2014) architecture (32 nm), while the A8-7410 uses Carrizo-L (2015) (28 nm). In PassMark, the Athlon X4 750 scores 2,751 against the A8-7410's 2,741 — a 0.4% lead for the Athlon X4 750.

FeatureAthlon X4 750A8-7410
Cores / Threads
4 / 4
4 / 4
Boost Clock
4 GHz+60%
2.5 GHz
Base Clock
3.4 GHz+55%
2.2 GHz
L2 Cache
4 MB+100%
2048 kB
Process
32 nm
28 nm-13%
Architecture
Richland (2013−2014)
Carrizo-L (2015)
PassMark
2,751
2,741
Geekbench 6 Single
1,356
Geekbench 6 Multi
3,460
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Athlon X4 750 uses the FM2 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the A8-7410 uses FP4 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR3-1866 memory speed. The Athlon X4 750 supports up to 64 GB of RAM compared to 16 GB 120% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Athlon X4 750) vs 1 (A8-7410). PCIe lanes: 16 (Athlon X4 750) vs 8 (A8-7410) — the Athlon X4 750 offers 8 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: AMD FM2 (Athlon X4 750) and Carrizo-L SoC (A8-7410).

FeatureAthlon X4 750A8-7410
Socket
FM2
FP4
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0
PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR3-1866
DDR3L-1866
Max RAM Capacity
64 GB+300%
16 GB
RAM Channels
2+100%
1
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
16+100%
8
🔧

Advanced Features

Only the Athlon X4 750 has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Both support AMD-V virtualization. The A8-7410 includes integrated graphics (AMD Radeon R5 Graphics), while the Athlon X4 750 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Athlon X4 750 targets Desktop, A8-7410 targets Entry-level Laptop. Direct competitor: A8-7410 rivals Pentium N3700.

FeatureAthlon X4 750A8-7410
Integrated GPU
No
Yes
IGPU Model
AMD Radeon R5 Graphics
Unlocked
Yes
No
AVX-512
No
No
Virtualization
AMD-V
AMD-V
Target Use
Desktop
Entry-level Laptop