Athlon X4 750 vs Athlon PRO 3045B
Athlon X4 750
Athlon PRO 3045B
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Athlon X4 750 is positioned at rank 611 and the Athlon PRO 3045B is on rank 1177, so the Athlon X4 750 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Athlon X4 750
Performance Per Dollar Athlon PRO 3045B
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Athlon X4 750 | Athlon PRO 3045B |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ✅ Superior gaming performance | ❌ Lower gaming performance |
| Workstation | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks | ✅ Better multi-core power |
| Price | ✅ More affordable ($95) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($180) |
| Longevity | 🛑 Legacy (Richland (2013−2014) / 32 nm) | ✨ Modern (Dali (2020−2021) / 14 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Athlon X4 750 | Athlon PRO 3045B |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+88%) | ❌ Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅ More affordable ($95) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($180) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Athlon X4 750 and Athlon PRO 3045B
Athlon X4 750
The Athlon X4 750 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the Richland (2013−2014) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.4 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L2 cache: 4 MB. Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: FM2. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-1866. Passmark benchmark score: 2,751 points. Launch price was $149.
Athlon PRO 3045B
The Athlon PRO 3045B is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the Dali (2020−2021) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.3 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 2,770 points. Launch price was $149.
Processing Power
The Athlon X4 750 packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Athlon PRO 3045B offers 2 cores / 4 threads — the Athlon X4 750 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4 GHz on the Athlon X4 750 versus 3.2 GHz on the Athlon PRO 3045B — a 22.2% clock advantage for the Athlon X4 750 (base: 3.4 GHz vs 2.3 GHz). The Athlon X4 750 uses the Richland (2013−2014) architecture (32 nm), while the Athlon PRO 3045B uses Dali (2020−2021) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Athlon X4 750 scores 2,751 against the Athlon PRO 3045B's 2,770 — a 0.7% lead for the Athlon PRO 3045B.
| Feature | Athlon X4 750 | Athlon PRO 3045B |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 4+100% | 2 / 4 |
| Boost Clock | 4 GHz+25% | 3.2 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.4 GHz+48% | 2.3 GHz |
| L3 Cache | — | 4 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+700% | 512 kB (per core) |
| Process | 32 nm | 14 nm-56% |
| Architecture | Richland (2013−2014) | Dali (2020−2021) |
| PassMark | 2,751 | 2,770 |
Memory & Platform
The Athlon X4 750 uses the FM2 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Athlon PRO 3045B uses FP5 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3-1866 on the Athlon X4 750 versus DDR4-2400 on the Athlon PRO 3045B — the Athlon PRO 3045B supports 28.6% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Athlon X4 750 supports up to 64 GB of RAM compared to 32 GB — 66.7% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 16 (Athlon X4 750) vs 8 (Athlon PRO 3045B) — the Athlon X4 750 offers 8 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: AMD FM2 (Athlon X4 750) and AMD FP5 (Athlon PRO 3045B).
| Feature | Athlon X4 750 | Athlon PRO 3045B |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FM2 | FP5 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 4.0+33% |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR3-1866 | DDR4-2400+33% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 64 GB+100% | 32 GB |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | ❌ | ✅ |
| PCIe Lanes | 16+100% | 8 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: AMD-V (Athlon X4 750) / not specified (Athlon PRO 3045B). The Athlon PRO 3045B includes integrated graphics (AMD Radeon Vega 3), while the Athlon X4 750 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Athlon X4 750 targets Desktop.
| Feature | Athlon X4 750 | Athlon PRO 3045B |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | Yes |
| IGPU Model | — | AMD Radeon Vega 3 |
| Unlocked | Yes | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | AMD-V | — |
| Target Use | Desktop | — |
Value Analysis
The Athlon X4 750 launched at $95 MSRP, while the Athlon PRO 3045B debuted at $426. At current prices ($95 vs $180), the Athlon X4 750 is $85 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Athlon X4 750 delivers 29.0 pts/$ vs 15.4 pts/$ for the Athlon PRO 3045B — making the Athlon X4 750 the 61.2% better value option.
| Feature | Athlon X4 750 | Athlon PRO 3045B |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $95-78% | $426 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $95-47% | $180 |
| Performance per Dollar | 29.0+88% | 15.4 |
| Release Date | 2013 | 2021 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Athlon X4 750 and Athlon PRO 3045B
