Athlon X4 750 vs FX-4130

Athlon X4 750 vs FX-4130 Performance Spectrum

Athlon X4 750

4 / 4

2,751

+1.2%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

FX-4130

4 / 4

2,718

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Athlon X4 750 vs FX-4130 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Athlon X4 750 vs FX-4130: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Athlon X4 750

2013

Why buy it

✅Costs $5 less on MSRP ($95 MSRP vs $100 MSRP).
✅Draws 65W instead of 125W, a 60W reduction.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.

FX-4130

2012

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (2,718 vs 2,751).
❌
5.3% HIGHER MSRP
$100 MSRPvs$95 MSRP
❌92.3% higher power demand at 125W vs 65W.

Quick Answers

So, is Athlon X4 750 better than FX-4130?

Yes. Athlon X4 750 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 1.7% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 1.2% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Athlon X4 750 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 1.7% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Athlon X4 750 is the stronger fit. You are getting 1.2% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Athlon X4 750 is the better buy right now. Athlon X4 750 comes in $5 cheaper on MSRP at $95 MSRP versus $100 MSRP, and it still gives you a 1.7% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 6.5% better value on MSRP (29.0 vs 27.2 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Athlon X4 750 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2013 vs 2012) and more multi-core headroom with 4 cores / 4 threads instead of 4/4. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Athlon X4 750 vs FX-4130 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Athlon X4 750

The Athlon X4 750 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the Richland (2013−2014) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.4 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L2 cache: 4 MB. Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: FM2. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-1866. Passmark benchmark score: 2,751 points. Launch price was $149.

FX-4130

The FX-4130 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 27 August 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Zambezi (2011−2012) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.8 GHz, with boost up to 3.9 GHz. L2 cache: 4096 kB. Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: AM3+. Thermal design power (TDP): 125 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,718 points. Launch price was $112.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Athlon X4 750 and FX-4130 share an identical 4-core/4-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 4 GHz on the Athlon X4 750 versus 3.9 GHz on the FX-4130 — a 2.5% clock advantage for the Athlon X4 750 (base: 3.4 GHz vs 3.8 GHz). The Athlon X4 750 uses the Richland (2013−2014) architecture (32 nm), while the FX-4130 uses Zambezi (2011−2012) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Athlon X4 750 scores 2,751 against the FX-4130's 2,718 — a 1.2% lead for the Athlon X4 750.

Feature	Athlon X4 750	FX-4130
Cores / Threads	4 / 4	4 / 4
Boost Clock	4 GHz+3%	3.9 GHz
Base Clock	3.4 GHz	3.8 GHz+12%
L2 Cache	4 MB	4096 kB
Process	32 nm	32 nm
Architecture	Richland (2013−2014)	Zambezi (2011−2012)
PassMark	2,751+1%	2,718

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Athlon X4 750 uses the FM2 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the FX-4130 uses AM3+ (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Athlon X4 750	FX-4130
Socket	FM2	AM3+
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0+50%	PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR3-1866	—
Max RAM Capacity	64 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	16	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: AMD-V (Athlon X4 750) / not specified (FX-4130). Primary use case: Athlon X4 750 targets Desktop.

Feature	Athlon X4 750	FX-4130
Integrated GPU	No	—
Unlocked	Yes	—
AVX-512	No	—
Virtualization	AMD-V	—
Target Use	Desktop	—

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Athlon X4 750 was priced at $95, while the FX-4130 came in at $100. On launch pricing ($95 vs $100), Athlon X4 750 was $5 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Athlon X4 750 delivers 29.0 pts/$ vs 27.2 pts/$ for the FX-4130 — making the Athlon X4 750 the 6.3% better value option.

Feature	Athlon X4 750	FX-4130
MSRP	$95-5%	$100
Performance per Dollar	29.0+7%	27.2
Release Date	2013	2012

Search Athlon X4 750 on Amazon

Search FX-4130 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.