Atom D2700 vs Atom x5-Z8550

Intel

Atom D2700

2 Cores4 Thrd10 WWMax: 0.13 GHz2011
VS
Intel

Atom x5-Z8550

4 Cores4 Thrdβˆ’WMax: 2.4 GHz2016

Atom D2700 vs Atom x5-Z8550 Performance Spectrum

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Atom D2700 vs Atom x5-Z8550 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Atom D2700 vs Atom x5-Z8550: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Atom D2700

2011

Why buy it

  • βœ…+0.4% higher PassMark.

Trade-offs

  • ❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.

Atom x5-Z8550

2016

Why buy it

    Trade-offs

    • ❌Lower PassMark (1,143 vs 1,148).

    Quick Answers

    So, is Atom D2700 better than Atom x5-Z8550?
    It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Atom x5-Z8550 is ahead with a 0.9% average FPS lead across 45 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Atom D2700 pulls ahead with 0.4% better PassMark.
    Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
    For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Atom D2700 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.4% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 4 threads.
    Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
    Atom D2700 still makes the most sense overall. Atom D2700 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you 0.4% better PassMark.
    Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
    Atom x5-Z8550 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2016 vs 2011). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

    Atom D2700 vs Atom x5-Z8550 Technical Specifications

    Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

    Intel

    Atom D2700

    The Atom D2700 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 November 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Cedarview (2011βˆ’2012) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.13 GHz, with boost up to 0.13 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA559. Thermal design power (TDP): 10 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,148 points. Launch price was $52.

    Intel

    Atom x5-Z8550

    The Atom x5-Z8550 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 8 February 2016 (9 years ago). It is based on the Cherry Trail (2015βˆ’2016) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.44 GHz, with boost up to 2.4 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: UTFCBGA1380. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,143 points. Launch price was $69.

    ⚑

    Processing Power

    The Atom D2700 packs 2 cores / 4 threads, while the Atom x5-Z8550 offers 4 cores / 4 threads β€” the Atom x5-Z8550 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 0.13 GHz on the Atom D2700 versus 2.4 GHz on the Atom x5-Z8550 β€” a 179.4% clock advantage for the Atom x5-Z8550 (base: 2.13 GHz vs 1.44 GHz). The Atom D2700 uses the Cedarview (2011βˆ’2012) architecture (32 nm), while the Atom x5-Z8550 uses Cherry Trail (2015βˆ’2016) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Atom D2700 scores 1,148 against the Atom x5-Z8550's 1,143 β€” a 0.4% lead for the Atom D2700. Both processors carry 0 kB of L3 cache.

    FeatureAtom D2700Atom x5-Z8550
    Cores / Threads
    2 / 4
    4 / 4+100%
    Boost Clock
    0.13 GHz
    2.4 GHz+1746%
    Base Clock
    2.13 GHz+48%
    1.44 GHz
    L3 Cache
    0 kB
    0 kB
    L2 Cache
    512K (per core)+25500%
    2 MB
    Process
    32 nm
    14 nm-56%
    Architecture
    Cedarview (2011βˆ’2012)
    Cherry Trail (2015βˆ’2016)
    PassMark
    1,148
    1,143
    🧠

    Memory & Platform

    The Atom D2700 uses the FCBGA559 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Atom x5-Z8550 uses UTFCBGA1380 (PCIe 3.0) β€” making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3-1066 on the Atom D2700 versus LPDDR3-1600 on the Atom x5-Z8550 β€” the Atom x5-Z8550 supports 50.1% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Atom x5-Z8550 supports up to 8 GB of RAM compared to 4 GB β€” 100% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 1 (Atom D2700) vs 2 (Atom x5-Z8550). PCIe lanes: 4 (Atom D2700) vs 2 (Atom x5-Z8550) β€” the Atom D2700 offers 2 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: Intel FCBGA559 (Atom D2700) and Intel FC-UTBGA592 (Atom x5-Z8550).

    FeatureAtom D2700Atom x5-Z8550
    Socket
    FCBGA559
    UTFCBGA1380
    PCIe Generation
    PCIe 2.0
    PCIe 3.0+50%
    Max RAM Speed
    DDR3-1066
    LPDDR3-1600+50%
    Max RAM Capacity
    4 GB
    8 GB+100%
    RAM Channels
    1
    2+100%
    ECC Support
    No
    No
    PCIe Lanes
    4+100%
    2
    πŸ”§

    Advanced Features

    Both include integrated graphics β€” Intel GMA 3650 (Atom D2700) and Intel HD Graphics (Cherry Trail) (Atom x5-Z8550) β€” useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU.

    FeatureAtom D2700Atom x5-Z8550
    Integrated GPU
    Yes
    Yes
    IGPU Model
    Intel GMA 3650
    Intel HD Graphics (Cherry Trail)