Atom x5-E8000
VS
A8-7600

Atom x5-E8000 vs A8-7600

Intel

Atom x5-E8000

4 Cores4 Thrd5 WWMax: 1.04 GHz2016
VS
AMD

A8-7600

4 Cores4 Thrd65 WWMax: 3.8 GHz2014

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Atom x5-E8000 is positioned at rank 18 and the A8-7600 is on rank 397, so the Atom x5-E8000 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Atom x5-E8000

#6
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
137%
#7
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
135%
#8
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
124%
#9
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
123%
#10
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
122%
#12
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
118%
#13
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
113%
#14
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
113%
#15
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
110%
#18
Atom x5-E8000
MSRP: $18|Avg: N/A
100%
#19
Core 2 Duo T5900
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $5
99%
#22
Core i3-3130M
MSRP: $225|Avg: N/A
89%
#23
Core 2 Duo T5550
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $5
85%
#24
Core 2 Duo T7100
MSRP: $197|Avg: $15
85%
#27
Pentium 2030M
MSRP: $134|Avg: N/A
81%
#28
Core 2 Duo T5750
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $8
81%
#29
Core 2 Duo T7200
MSRP: $286|Avg: $6
80%
#30
Core i5-3230M
MSRP: $225|Avg: $13
80%
#31
Atom D525
MSRP: $63|Avg: N/A
80%
#32
Atom x7835RE
MSRP: $127|Avg: N/A
79%
#33
Core 2 Duo P8400
MSRP: $209|Avg: $10
78%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar A8-7600

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
5819%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
5498%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
3992%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
1203%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
953%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
833%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
477%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
471%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
429%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
429%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
424%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
413%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
407%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
405%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
402%
#226
Ryzen 5 1600X
MSRP: $249|Avg: $144
98%
#334
Core i3-9100
MSRP: $122|Avg: $125
98%
#335
Core i9-10900X
MSRP: $590|Avg: $425
98%
#336
Core i7-8700T
MSRP: $303|Avg: $196
97%
#337
Ryzen 5 3600XT
MSRP: $249|Avg: $357
97%
#338
Core i9-10980XE
MSRP: $979|Avg: $620
97%
#397
A8-7600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#399
Phenom II X3 710
MSRP: $125|Avg: N/A
99%
#401
A10-7700K
MSRP: $152|Avg: N/A
99%
#402
Celeron G3930TE
MSRP: $42|Avg: $29
99%
#409
Core i3-8100
MSRP: $117|Avg: $45
97%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Trade-off: The A8-7600 leads in gaming performance. However, the Atom x5-E8000 is the stronger candidate for professional workloads, offering 0.2% greater multi-core processing power.
InsightAtom x5-E8000A8-7600
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Better multi-core power
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price
⚠️ Higher cost ($18)
More affordable ($0)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Cherry Trail (2015−2016) / 14 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Kaveri (2014−2015) / 28 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

InsightAtom x5-E8000A8-7600
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
⚠️ Higher cost ($18)
More affordable ($0)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Atom x5-E8000 and A8-7600

Intel

Atom x5-E8000

The Atom x5-E8000 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 8 February 2016 (9 years ago). It is based on the Cherry Trail (2015−2016) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Max frequency: 1.04 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Thermal design power (TDP): 5 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 3,219 points. Launch price was $39.

AMD

A8-7600

The A8-7600 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Kaveri (2014−2015) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.8 GHz. L2 cache: 4096 kB. Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: FM2+. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-2133. Passmark benchmark score: 3,214 points. Launch price was $90.

Processing Power

Both the Atom x5-E8000 and A8-7600 share an identical 4-core/4-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 1.04 GHz on the Atom x5-E8000 versus 3.8 GHz on the A8-7600 — a 114% clock advantage for the A8-7600. The Atom x5-E8000 uses the Cherry Trail (2015−2016) architecture (14 nm), while the A8-7600 uses Kaveri (2014−2015) (28 nm). In PassMark, the Atom x5-E8000 scores 3,219 against the A8-7600's 3,214 — a 0.2% lead for the Atom x5-E8000.

FeatureAtom x5-E8000A8-7600
Cores / Threads
4 / 4
4 / 4
Boost Clock
1.04 GHz
3.8 GHz+265%
Base Clock
3.1 GHz
L3 Cache
0 kB
L2 Cache
2 MB
4096 kB+100%
Process
14 nm-50%
28 nm
Architecture
Cherry Trail (2015−2016)
Kaveri (2014−2015)
PassMark
3,219
3,214
🧠

Memory & Platform

Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3L-1600 on the Atom x5-E8000 versus 2133 on the A8-7600 — the A8-7600 supports 199.4% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The A8-7600 supports up to 64 of RAM compared to 8 GB 155.6% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 4 (Atom x5-E8000) vs 16 (A8-7600) — the A8-7600 offers 12 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: Intel FCBGA1170 (Atom x5-E8000) and FM2+ (A8-7600).

FeatureAtom x5-E8000A8-7600
Socket
FM2+
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0
PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR3L-1600
2133+71000%
Max RAM Capacity
8 GB+13107100%
64
RAM Channels
2
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
4
16+300%
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (Atom x5-E8000) / true (A8-7600). Both include integrated graphics Intel HD Graphics (Braswell) (Atom x5-E8000) and Radeon R7 Graphics (A8-7600) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Direct competitor: A8-7600 rivals Core i3-4150.

FeatureAtom x5-E8000A8-7600
Integrated GPU
Yes
Yes
IGPU Model
Intel HD Graphics (Braswell)
Radeon R7 Graphics
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
true