Atom x7213RE vs Atom x7211E

CPU

GPU

Atom x7213RE

2 Cores2 Thrd9 WWMax: 3.4 GHz2024

Atom x7211E

2 Cores2 Thrd6 WWMax: 3.2 GHz2023

Performance Spectrum - CPU

Atom x7213RE

2 / 2

2,538

0.0%

2,553

+0.6%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Atom x7213RE is positioned at rank 401 and the Atom x7211E is on rank 240, so the Atom x7211E offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Atom x7213RE

#120

Core i7-11850HE

MSRP: $400|Avg: $75

99%

#124

Core i5-1240P

MSRP: $309|Avg: $200

97%

#389

Atom x5-Z8300

MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A

543%

#390

Atom Z3735G

MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A

535%

#391

Core i5-480M

MSRP: $81|Avg: $77

491%

#392

Core i5-460M

MSRP: $80|Avg: $129

489%

#393

Core i5-2540M

MSRP: $266|Avg: $10

485%

#395

Core i5-450M

MSRP: $32|Avg: $31

468%

#396

Core i3-380M

MSRP: $49|Avg: $25

449%

#397

Core i5-430M

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33

448%

#398

Core 2 Duo T6600

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4

436%

#401

Atom x7213RE

MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A

100%

Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Atom x7211E

#64

Ryzen AI Max PRO 390

MSRP: $600|Avg: $600

99%

#228

Atom x5-Z8300

MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A

402%

#229

Atom Z3735G

MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A

396%

#230

Core i5-480M

MSRP: $81|Avg: $77

364%

#231

Core i5-460M

MSRP: $80|Avg: $129

362%

#232

Core i5-2540M

MSRP: $266|Avg: $10

359%

#234

Core i5-450M

MSRP: $32|Avg: $31

347%

#235

Core i3-380M

MSRP: $49|Avg: $25

332%

#236

Core i5-430M

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33

332%

#237

Core 2 Duo T6600

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4

323%

#240

Atom x7211E

MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A

100%

Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Trade-off: The Atom x7213RE leads in gaming performance. However, the Atom x7211E is the stronger candidate for professional workloads, offering 0.6% greater multi-core processing power.

Insight	Atom x7213RE	Atom x7211E
Gaming	✅ Superior gaming performance	❌ Lower gaming performance
Workstation	❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks	✅ Better multi-core power
Price	Equivalent pricing	Equivalent pricing
Longevity	✨ Modern (Amston Lake (2024−2025) / 10 nm)	✨ Modern (Gracemont (2023) / 10 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

Insight	Atom x7213RE	Atom x7211E
Cost Efficiency	❌ Lower cost efficiency	❌ Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost	Equivalent pricing	Equivalent pricing

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Atom x7213RE Benchmark Check

Atom x7211E Benchmark Check

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Atom x7213RE and Atom x7211E

Atom x7213RE

The Atom x7213RE is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 8 April 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Amston Lake (2024−2025) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 3.4 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (total). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1264. Thermal design power (TDP): 9 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 2,538 points. Launch price was $42.

Atom x7211E

The Atom x7211E is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Gracemont (2023) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (total). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1744. Thermal design power (TDP): 6 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5 4800 MHz Single-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 2,553 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Atom x7213RE and Atom x7211E share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 3.4 GHz on the Atom x7213RE versus 3.2 GHz on the Atom x7211E — a 6.1% clock advantage for the Atom x7213RE (base: 2 GHz vs 1 GHz). The Atom x7213RE uses the Amston Lake (2024−2025) architecture (10 nm), while the Atom x7211E uses Gracemont (2023) (10 nm). In PassMark, the Atom x7213RE scores 2,538 against the Atom x7211E's 2,553 — a 0.6% lead for the Atom x7211E. Both processors carry 6 MB (total) of L3 cache.

Feature	Atom x7213RE	Atom x7211E
Cores / Threads	2 / 2	2 / 2
Boost Clock	3.4 GHz+6%	3.2 GHz
Base Clock	2 GHz+100%	1 GHz
L3 Cache	6 MB (total)	6 MB (total)
L2 Cache	2 MB (total)	2 MB (total)
Process	10 nm	10 nm
Architecture	Amston Lake (2024−2025)	Gracemont (2023)
PassMark	2,538	2,553

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Atom x7213RE uses the FCBGA1264 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Atom x7211E uses FCBGA1744 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR5-4800 memory speed. Both support up to 16 GB of RAM. Both feature 1-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 9 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: Intel BGA1264 (Atom x7213RE) and Intel BGA1264 (Atom x7211E).

Feature	Atom x7213RE	Atom x7211E
Socket	FCBGA1264	FCBGA1744
PCIe Generation	PCIe 4.0	PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR5-4800	DDR5-4800
Max RAM Capacity	16 GB	16 GB
RAM Channels	1	1
ECC Support	✅	❌
PCIe Lanes	9	9

🔧

Advanced Features

Both include integrated graphics — Intel UHD Graphics (16EU) (Atom x7213RE) and Intel UHD Graphics (16EU) (Atom x7211E) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU.