
Atom Z3735G

Ryzen 7 3700X
Atom Z3735G vs Ryzen 7 3700X Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Atom Z3735G vs Ryzen 7 3700X FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Atom Z3735G vs Ryzen 7 3700X: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Atom Z3735G
2014Why buy it
- ✅Costs $312 less on MSRP ($17 MSRP vs $329 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 149.4% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 170.1 vs 68.2 PassMark/$ ($17 MSRP vs $329 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 2W instead of 65W, a 63W reduction.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail), while Ryzen 7 3700X needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 3700X across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (2,891 vs 22,430).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (2 MB vs 32 MB).
Ryzen 7 3700X
2019Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +298.6% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+1500% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 2 MB).
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 68.2 vs 170.1 PassMark/$ ($329 MSRP vs $17 MSRP).
- ❌3150% higher power demand at 65W vs 2W.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Atom Z3735G can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 7 3700X better than Atom Z3735G?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Atom Z3735G vs Ryzen 7 3700X Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Atom Z3735G
The Atom Z3735G is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 9 April 2014 (11 years ago). It is based on the Bay Trail-T (2013−2014) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.33 GHz, with boost up to 1.83 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB L2 Cache. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: UTFCBGA592. Thermal design power (TDP): 2 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,891 points. Launch price was $17.


Ryzen 7 3700X
The Ryzen 7 3700X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 7 July 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 22,430 points. Launch price was $329.
Processing Power
The Atom Z3735G packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Ryzen 7 3700X offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Ryzen 7 3700X has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 1.83 GHz on the Atom Z3735G versus 4.4 GHz on the Ryzen 7 3700X — a 82.5% clock advantage for the Ryzen 7 3700X (base: 1.33 GHz vs 3.6 GHz). The Atom Z3735G uses the Bay Trail-T (2013−2014) architecture (22 nm), while the Ryzen 7 3700X uses Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020) (7 nm, 12 nm). In PassMark, the Atom Z3735G scores 2,891 against the Ryzen 7 3700X's 22,430 — a 154.3% lead for the Ryzen 7 3700X. L3 cache: 2 MB L2 Cache on the Atom Z3735G vs 32 MB on the Ryzen 7 3700X.
| Feature | Atom Z3735G | Ryzen 7 3700X |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 4 | 8 / 16+100% |
| Boost Clock | 1.83 GHz | 4.4 GHz+140% |
| Base Clock | 1.33 GHz | 3.6 GHz+171% |
| L3 Cache | 2 MB L2 Cache | 32 MB+1500% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 512K (per core)+25500% |
| Process | 22 nm | 7 nm, 12 nm-68% |
| Architecture | Bay Trail-T (2013−2014) | Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020) |
| PassMark | 2,891 | 22,430+676% |
Memory & Platform
The Atom Z3735G uses the UTFCBGA592 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Ryzen 7 3700X uses AM4 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3L-RS 1333 on the Atom Z3735G versus DDR4-3200 on the Ryzen 7 3700X — the Ryzen 7 3700X supports 140.1% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Ryzen 7 3700X supports up to 128 GB of RAM compared to 1 GB — 12700% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 1 (Atom Z3735G) vs 2 (Ryzen 7 3700X). PCIe lanes: 0 (Atom Z3735G) vs 24 (Ryzen 7 3700X) — the Ryzen 7 3700X offers 24 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: Intel FC-UTBGA592 (Atom Z3735G) and AMD 500 series,AMD 400 series,AMD 300 series (Ryzen 7 3700X).
| Feature | Atom Z3735G | Ryzen 7 3700X |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | UTFCBGA592 | AM4 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 2.0 | PCIe 4.0+100% |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR3L-RS 1333 | DDR4-3200+140% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 1 GB | 128 GB+12700% |
| RAM Channels | 1 | 2+100% |
| ECC Support | No | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 0 | 24 |
Advanced Features
The Atom Z3735G includes integrated graphics (Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail)), while the Ryzen 7 3700X requires a dedicated GPU.
| Feature | Atom Z3735G | Ryzen 7 3700X |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | No |
| IGPU Model | Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail) | — |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Atom Z3735G was priced at $17, while the Ryzen 7 3700X came in at $329. On launch pricing ($17 vs $329), Atom Z3735G was $312 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Atom Z3735G delivers 170.1 pts/$ vs 68.2 pts/$ for the Ryzen 7 3700X — making the Atom Z3735G the 85.5% better value option.
| Feature | Atom Z3735G | Ryzen 7 3700X |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $17-95% | $329 |
| Performance per Dollar | 170.1+149% | 68.2 |
| Release Date | 2014 | 2019 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.














