Celeron 1005M vs Ryzen 7 3700X

CPU

GPU

Celeron 1005M

2 Cores2 Thrd512 WWMax: 1.9 GHz2013

Similar parts

·······

Buy on Amazon

Ryzen 7 3700X

8 Cores16 Thrd65 WWMax: 4.4 GHz2019

Ryzen family

·······

Buy on Amazon

Celeron 1005M vs Ryzen 7 3700X Performance Spectrum

Celeron 1005M

2 / 2

1,116

0.0%

Pentium D 830

Pentium T2370

Pentium T3400

Pentium Dual-Core E2200

22,430

+1909.9%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX

Ryzen 9 9900X3D

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX

Ryzen Threadripper 9960X

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Celeron 1005M vs Ryzen 7 3700X FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Celeron 1005M vs Ryzen 7 3700X: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Celeron 1005M

2013

Why buy it

✅Costs $243 less on MSRP ($86 MSRP vs $329 MSRP).
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel HD Graphics (Ivy Bridge), while Ryzen 7 3700X needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 3700X across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (1,116 vs 22,430).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (2 MB vs 32 MB).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 13.0 vs 68.2 PassMark/$ ($86 MSRP vs $329 MSRP).
❌687.7% higher power demand at 512W vs 65W.

Ryzen 7 3700X

2019

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +810.5% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+1500% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 2 MB).
✅Delivers 425.4% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 68.2 vs 13.0 PassMark/$ ($329 MSRP vs $86 MSRP).
✅Draws 65W instead of 512W, a 447W reduction.
✅50% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 16) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌
282.6% HIGHER MSRP
$329 MSRPvs$86 MSRP
❌No integrated graphics, while Celeron 1005M can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Ryzen 7 3700X better than Celeron 1005M?

Yes. Ryzen 7 3700X is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 810.5% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 1909.9% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Ryzen 7 3700X is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 810.5% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Ryzen 7 3700X is the stronger fit. You are getting 1909.9% better PassMark, backed by 8 cores and 16 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 1500% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 2 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Ryzen 7 3700X is the better buy right now. Ryzen 7 3700X comes in 282.6% more expensive on MSRP at $329 MSRP versus $86 MSRP, and it still gives you a 810.5% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 425.4% better value on MSRP (68.2 vs 13.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Ryzen 7 3700X makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2019 vs 2013), 1500% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 2 MB), and more multi-core headroom with 8 cores / 16 threads instead of 2/2. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Celeron 1005M vs Ryzen 7 3700X Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Celeron 1005M

The Celeron 1005M is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 July 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.9 GHz, with boost up to 1.9 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: PGA988. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,116 points. Launch price was $86.

Ryzen 7 3700X

The Ryzen 7 3700X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 7 July 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 22,430 points. Launch price was $329.

⚡

Processing Power

The Celeron 1005M packs 2 cores / 2 threads, while the Ryzen 7 3700X offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Ryzen 7 3700X has 6 more cores. Boost clocks reach 1.9 GHz on the Celeron 1005M versus 4.4 GHz on the Ryzen 7 3700X — a 79.4% clock advantage for the Ryzen 7 3700X (base: 1.9 GHz vs 3.6 GHz). The Celeron 1005M uses the Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) architecture (22 nm), while the Ryzen 7 3700X uses Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020) (7 nm, 12 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron 1005M scores 1,116 against the Ryzen 7 3700X's 22,430 — a 181% lead for the Ryzen 7 3700X. L3 cache: 2 MB on the Celeron 1005M vs 32 MB on the Ryzen 7 3700X.

Feature	Celeron 1005M	Ryzen 7 3700X
Cores / Threads	2 / 2	8 / 16+300%
Boost Clock	1.9 GHz	4.4 GHz+132%
Base Clock	1.9 GHz	3.6 GHz+89%
L3 Cache	2 MB	32 MB+1500%
L2 Cache	512 kB	512K (per core)
Process	22 nm	7 nm, 12 nm-68%
Architecture	Ivy Bridge (2012−2013)	Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020)
PassMark	1,116	22,430+1910%
Cinebench R23 Multi	656	—
Geekbench 6 Single	350	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	607	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron 1005M uses the PGA988 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Ryzen 7 3700X uses AM4 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3-1600 on the Celeron 1005M versus DDR4-3200 on the Ryzen 7 3700X — the Ryzen 7 3700X supports 100% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Ryzen 7 3700X supports up to 128 GB of RAM compared to 32 GB — 300% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 16 (Celeron 1005M) vs 24 (Ryzen 7 3700X) — the Ryzen 7 3700X offers 8 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: HM76,HM77 (Celeron 1005M) and AMD 500 series,AMD 400 series,AMD 300 series (Ryzen 7 3700X).

Feature	Celeron 1005M	Ryzen 7 3700X
Socket	PGA988	AM4
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 4.0+33%
Max RAM Speed	DDR3-1600	DDR4-3200+100%
Max RAM Capacity	32 GB	128 GB+300%
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	No	Yes
PCIe Lanes	16	24+50%

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Celeron 1005M) / not specified (Ryzen 7 3700X). The Celeron 1005M includes integrated graphics (Intel HD Graphics (Ivy Bridge)), while the Ryzen 7 3700X requires a dedicated GPU.

Feature	Celeron 1005M	Ryzen 7 3700X
Integrated GPU	Yes	No
IGPU Model	Intel HD Graphics (Ivy Bridge)	—
Unlocked	No	—
AVX-512	No	—
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d	—

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Celeron 1005M was priced at $86, while the Ryzen 7 3700X came in at $329. On launch pricing ($86 vs $329), Celeron 1005M was $243 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Celeron 1005M delivers 13.0 pts/$ vs 68.2 pts/$ for the Ryzen 7 3700X — making the Ryzen 7 3700X the 136% better value option.

Feature	Celeron 1005M	Ryzen 7 3700X
MSRP	$86-74%	$329
Performance per Dollar	13.0	68.2+425%
Release Date	2013	2019

Search Celeron 1005M on Amazon

Search Ryzen 7 3700X on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.