Celeron 4205U
VS
A4-5300

Celeron 4205U vs A4-5300

Intel

Celeron 4205U

2 Cores2 Thrd15 WWMax: 1.8 GHz2019
VS
AMD

A4-5300

2 Cores2 Thrd65 WWMax: 3.6 GHz2012

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Celeron 4205U is positioned at rank 152 and the A4-5300 is on rank 731, so the Celeron 4205U offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Celeron 4205U

#42
Ryzen 9 9955HX3D
MSRP: $749|Avg: N/A
98%
#140
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
326%
#141
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
321%
#142
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
295%
#143
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
294%
#144
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
291%
#146
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
281%
#147
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
269%
#148
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
269%
#149
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
262%
#152
Celeron 4205U
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#158
Core i5-3210M
MSRP: $225|Avg: $30
98%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar A4-5300

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
13684%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
12930%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
9388%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
2828%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
2240%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
1960%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
1122%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
1108%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
1009%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
1009%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
997%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
970%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
957%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
953%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
944%
#392
Celeron G4920
MSRP: $52|Avg: $115
98%
#731
A4-5300
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#732
Core i3-4350T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $20
100%
#733
Athlon II X4 641
MSRP: $102|Avg: $102
100%
#734
Athlon II X3 460
MSRP: $87|Avg: $15
99%
#735
Pentium G2100T
MSRP: $75|Avg: $10
99%
#736
Core i5-3330
MSRP: $182|Avg: $21
99%
#737
Core i3-4330T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $15
99%
#738
Pentium E5300
MSRP: $62|Avg: $25
99%
#739
Athlon II X2 215
MSRP: $45|Avg: $10
99%
#740
Core i7-4790S
MSRP: $312|Avg: $60
98%
#741
FX-6100
MSRP: $165|Avg: $25
98%
#742
Pentium G2020T
MSRP: $64|Avg: $69
98%
#743
Core i7-4771
MSRP: $320|Avg: $78
98%
#745
Core i7-4770S
MSRP: $305|Avg: $35
97%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Generational Difference: This comparison involves processors from different technological eras. The Celeron 4205U (2019) utilizes 14 nm technology and DDR3, DDR4, providing a fundamental performance advantage.
InsightCeleron 4205UA4-5300
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing
Longevity
✨ Modern (Whiskey Lake-U (2018−2019) / 14 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Trinity (2012−2013) / 32 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The A4-5300 (2012) relies on 32 nm technology and DDR3, placing it in a different performance category relative to modern standards.
InsightCeleron 4205UA4-5300
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Celeron 4205U and A4-5300

Intel

Celeron 4205U

The Celeron 4205U is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 23 January 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Whiskey Lake-U (2018−2019) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.8 GHz, with boost up to 1.8 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1528. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR3, DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 1,350 points. Launch price was $107.

AMD

A4-5300

The A4-5300 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Trinity (2012−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 3.4 GHz, with boost up to 3.6 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: FM2. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,367 points. Launch price was $50.

Processing Power

Both the Celeron 4205U and A4-5300 share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 1.8 GHz on the Celeron 4205U versus 3.6 GHz on the A4-5300 — a 66.7% clock advantage for the A4-5300 (base: 1.8 GHz vs 3.4 GHz). The Celeron 4205U uses the Whiskey Lake-U (2018−2019) architecture (14 nm), while the A4-5300 uses Trinity (2012−2013) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron 4205U scores 1,350 against the A4-5300's 1,367 — a 1.3% lead for the A4-5300. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 347 vs 372, a 7% lead for the A4-5300 that directly translates to higher frame rates. L3 cache: 2 MB (total) on the Celeron 4205U vs 0 kB on the A4-5300.

FeatureCeleron 4205UA4-5300
Cores / Threads
2 / 2
2 / 2
Boost Clock
1.8 GHz
3.6 GHz+100%
Base Clock
1.8 GHz
3.4 GHz+89%
L3 Cache
2 MB (total)
0 kB
L2 Cache
256 kB (per core)
1 MB (per core)+300%
Process
14 nm-56%
32 nm
Architecture
Whiskey Lake-U (2018−2019)
Trinity (2012−2013)
PassMark
1,350
1,367+1%
Geekbench 6 Single
347
372+7%
Geekbench 6 Multi
585
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron 4205U uses the FCBGA1528 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the A4-5300 uses FM2 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-2133 on the Celeron 4205U versus DDR3-1600 on the A4-5300 — the Celeron 4205U supports 28.6% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Celeron 4205U supports up to 64 GB of RAM compared to 32 GB 66.7% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 12 (Celeron 4205U) vs 16 (A4-5300) — the A4-5300 offers 4 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: Whiskey Lake-U (Celeron 4205U) and A55,A75,A85X (A4-5300).

FeatureCeleron 4205UA4-5300
Socket
FCBGA1528
FM2
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0+50%
PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR4-2133+33%
DDR3-1600
Max RAM Capacity
64 GB+100%
32 GB
RAM Channels
2
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
12
16+33%
🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Celeron 4205U) vs AMD-V (A4-5300). Both include integrated graphics UHD Graphics 610 (Celeron 4205U) and Radeon HD 7480D (A4-5300) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron 4205U targets Budget, A4-5300 targets Budget Desktop. Direct competitor: Celeron 4205U rivals Pentium Gold 4417U; A4-5300 rivals Celeron G1620.

FeatureCeleron 4205UA4-5300
Integrated GPU
Yes
Yes
IGPU Model
UHD Graphics 610
Radeon HD 7480D
Unlocked
No
No
AVX-512
No
No
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d
AMD-V
Target Use
Budget
Budget Desktop