Celeron 4305UE vs PRO A6-9500E

Celeron 4305UE vs PRO A6-9500E Performance Spectrum

Celeron 4305UE

2 / 2

1,699

+0.6%

1,689

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5945WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Celeron 4305UE vs PRO A6-9500E FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Celeron 4305UE vs PRO A6-9500E: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Celeron 4305UE

2018

Why buy it

✅+0.6% higher PassMark.
✅Draws 15W instead of 35W, a 20W reduction.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with UHD Graphics 610, while PRO A6-9500E needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Launch MSRP is still $107 MSRP, while PRO A6-9500E mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

PRO A6-9500E

2016

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (1,689 vs 1,699).
❌133.3% higher power demand at 35W vs 15W.
❌No integrated graphics, while Celeron 4305UE can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Celeron 4305UE better than PRO A6-9500E?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, PRO A6-9500E is ahead with a 2.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Celeron 4305UE pulls ahead with 0.6% better PassMark.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Celeron 4305UE is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.6% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Celeron 4305UE is the better buy right now. Celeron 4305UE comes in at an unclear MSRP at $107 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you 0.6% better PassMark. The compromise is that PRO A6-9500E is still the better pure gaming CPU with a 2.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (15.9 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Celeron 4305UE makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2018 vs 2016) and more multi-core headroom with 2 cores / 2 threads instead of 2/2. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Celeron 4305UE vs PRO A6-9500E Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Celeron 4305UE

The Celeron 4305UE is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 October 2018 (7 years ago). It is based on the Whiskey Lake-U (2018−2019) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 2 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1528. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 1,699 points. Launch price was $107.

PRO A6-9500E

The PRO A6-9500E is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 3 October 2016 (9 years ago). It is based on the Bristol Ridge (2016−2019) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 3.4 GHz. L2 cache: 1024 kB. Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2400. Passmark benchmark score: 1,689 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Celeron 4305UE and PRO A6-9500E share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2 GHz on the Celeron 4305UE versus 3.4 GHz on the PRO A6-9500E — a 51.9% clock advantage for the PRO A6-9500E. The Celeron 4305UE uses the Whiskey Lake-U (2018−2019) architecture (10 nm), while the PRO A6-9500E uses Bristol Ridge (2016−2019) (28 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron 4305UE scores 1,699 against the PRO A6-9500E's 1,689 — a 0.6% lead for the Celeron 4305UE.

Feature	Celeron 4305UE	PRO A6-9500E
Cores / Threads	2 / 2	2 / 2
Boost Clock	2 GHz	3.4 GHz+70%
Base Clock	—	3 GHz
L3 Cache	2 MB (total)	—
L2 Cache	256 kB (per core)	1024 kB+300%
Process	10 nm-64%	28 nm
Architecture	Whiskey Lake-U (2018−2019)	Bristol Ridge (2016−2019)
PassMark	1,699	1,689
Geekbench 6 Single	670	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	1,065	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron 4305UE uses the FCBGA1528 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the PRO A6-9500E uses AM4 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Celeron 4305UE	PRO A6-9500E
Socket	FCBGA1528	AM4
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR4-2133	—
Max RAM Capacity	64 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	16	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Celeron 4305UE) / not specified (PRO A6-9500E). The Celeron 4305UE includes integrated graphics (UHD Graphics 610), while the PRO A6-9500E requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron 4305UE targets Budget. Direct competitor: Celeron 4305UE rivals Athlon Silver 3050GE.