Celeron 440 vs Mobile Sempron M100

Celeron 440 vs Mobile Sempron M100 Performance Spectrum

Celeron 440

1 / 1

472

+5.4%

448

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Celeron 440 vs Mobile Sempron M100 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Celeron 440 vs Mobile Sempron M100: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Celeron 440

2007

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +8.9% higher average FPS across 46 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Draws 35W instead of 512W, a 477W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Launch MSRP is still $59 MSRP, while Mobile Sempron M100 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

Mobile Sempron M100

2009

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Celeron 440 across 46 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (448 vs 472).
❌1362.9% higher power demand at 512W vs 35W.

Quick Answers

So, is Celeron 440 better than Mobile Sempron M100?

Yes. Celeron 440 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 8.9% average FPS lead across 46 shared CPU game tests in our data and 5.4% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Celeron 440 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 8.9% more average FPS across 46 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Celeron 440 is the stronger fit. You are getting 5.4% better PassMark, backed by 1 cores and 1 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Celeron 440 is the better buy right now. Celeron 440 comes in at an unclear MSRP at $59 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 8.9% average FPS lead across 46 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (8.0 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Mobile Sempron M100 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2009 vs 2007). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Celeron 440 vs Mobile Sempron M100 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Celeron 440

The Celeron 440 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 June 2007 (18 years ago). It is based on the Conroe-L (2007−2008) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 2 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: LGA775. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR1, DDR2, DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 472 points. Launch price was $40.

Mobile Sempron M100

The Mobile Sempron M100 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 10 September 2009 (16 years ago). It is based on the Caspian (2009) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 2 GHz. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 40 nm process technology. Socket: S. Thermal design power (TDP): 512 kB. Passmark benchmark score: 448 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Celeron 440 and Mobile Sempron M100 share an identical 1-core/1-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2 GHz on the Celeron 440 versus 2 GHz on the Mobile Sempron M100 — identical boost frequencies. The Celeron 440 uses the Conroe-L (2007−2008) architecture (65 nm), while the Mobile Sempron M100 uses Caspian (2009) (40 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron 440 scores 472 against the Mobile Sempron M100's 448 — a 5.2% lead for the Celeron 440.

Feature	Celeron 440	Mobile Sempron M100
Cores / Threads	1 / 1	1 / 1
Boost Clock	2 GHz	2 GHz
Base Clock	2 GHz	—
L3 Cache	0 kB	—
L2 Cache	512 kB	512 kB
Process	65 nm	40 nm-38%
Architecture	Conroe-L (2007−2008)	Caspian (2009)
PassMark	472+5%	448
Geekbench 6 Single	244	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron 440 uses the LGA775 socket (PCIe 1.1), while the Mobile Sempron M100 uses S (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Celeron 440	Mobile Sempron M100
Socket	LGA775	S
PCIe Generation	PCIe 1.1	PCIe 2.0+82%
Max RAM Speed	DDR2-800	—
Max RAM Capacity	4 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	0	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: No (Celeron 440) / not specified (Mobile Sempron M100). Primary use case: Celeron 440 targets Budget. Direct competitor: Celeron 440 rivals Pentium 4 2.80.