Celeron 440 vs Turion 64 MT-28

Celeron 440 vs Turion 64 MT-28 Performance Spectrum

Celeron 440

1 / 1

472

+6.1%

445

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Celeron 440 vs Turion 64 MT-28 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Celeron 440 vs Turion 64 MT-28: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Celeron 440

2007

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +8.9% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Draws 35W instead of 512W, a 477W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Launch MSRP is still $59 MSRP, while Turion 64 MT-28 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

Turion 64 MT-28

2005

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Celeron 440 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (445 vs 472).
❌1362.9% higher power demand at 512W vs 35W.

Quick Answers

So, is Celeron 440 better than Turion 64 MT-28?

Yes. Celeron 440 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 8.9% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 6.1% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Celeron 440 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 8.9% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Celeron 440 is the stronger fit. You are getting 6.1% better PassMark, backed by 1 cores and 1 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Celeron 440 is the better buy right now. Celeron 440 comes in at an unclear MSRP at $59 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 8.9% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (8.0 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Celeron 440 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2007 vs 2005) and more multi-core headroom with 1 cores / 1 threads instead of 1/1. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Celeron 440 vs Turion 64 MT-28 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Celeron 440

The Celeron 440 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 June 2007 (18 years ago). It is based on the Conroe-L (2007−2008) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 2 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: LGA775. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR1, DDR2, DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 472 points. Launch price was $40.

Turion 64 MT-28

The Turion 64 MT-28 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Lancaster (2005−2006) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 1.6 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 90 nm process technology. Socket: 754. Thermal design power (TDP): 512 kB. Passmark benchmark score: 445 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Celeron 440 and Turion 64 MT-28 share an identical 1-core/1-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2 GHz on the Celeron 440 versus 1.6 GHz on the Turion 64 MT-28 — a 22.2% clock advantage for the Celeron 440. The Celeron 440 uses the Conroe-L (2007−2008) architecture (65 nm), while the Turion 64 MT-28 uses Lancaster (2005−2006) (90 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron 440 scores 472 against the Turion 64 MT-28's 445 — a 5.9% lead for the Celeron 440. Both processors carry 0 kB of L3 cache.

Feature	Celeron 440	Turion 64 MT-28
Cores / Threads	1 / 1	1 / 1
Boost Clock	2 GHz+25%	1.6 GHz
Base Clock	2 GHz	—
L3 Cache	0 kB	0 kB
L2 Cache	512 kB	512 kB
Process	65 nm-28%	90 nm
Architecture	Conroe-L (2007−2008)	Lancaster (2005−2006)
PassMark	472+6%	445
Geekbench 6 Single	244	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron 440 uses the LGA775 socket (PCIe 1.1), while the Turion 64 MT-28 uses 754 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Celeron 440	Turion 64 MT-28
Socket	LGA775	754
PCIe Generation	PCIe 1.1	PCIe 2.0+82%
Max RAM Speed	DDR2-800	—
Max RAM Capacity	4 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	0	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: No (Celeron 440) / not specified (Turion 64 MT-28). Primary use case: Celeron 440 targets Budget. Direct competitor: Celeron 440 rivals Pentium 4 2.80.