Celeron 847
VS
Ryzen 5 3600

Celeron 847 vs Ryzen 5 3600

Intel

Celeron 847

2 Cores2 Thrd17 WWMax: 1.1 GHz2011
VS
AMD

Ryzen 5 3600

6 Cores12 Thrd65 WWMax: 4.2 GHz2019

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. The Celeron 847 is positioned at rank #1093 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Celeron 847

#1081
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
3095%
#1082
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
3050%
#1083
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
2800%
#1084
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
2787%
#1085
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
2761%
#1087
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
2667%
#1088
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
2557%
#1089
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
2553%
#1090
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
2484%
#1093
Celeron 847
MSRP: $134|Avg: $15
100%
#1094
Core i7-2630QM
MSRP: $378|Avg: N/A
99%
#1096
Core i7-2635QM
MSRP: $378|Avg: N/A
99%
#1097
Celeron 877
MSRP: $86|Avg: $15
99%
#1098
Celeron Dual-Core SU2300
MSRP: $134|Avg: $50
98%
#1099
Core i5-3337U
MSRP: $225|Avg: N/A
98%
#1100
Core i5-2450M
MSRP: $225|Avg: N/A
97%
#1101
Core i5-7Y54
MSRP: $281|Avg: $100
97%
#1102
Core i5-7Y57
MSRP: $281|Avg: $281
97%
#1104
Pentium 997
MSRP: $134|Avg: $10
96%
#1105
Pentium A1018
MSRP: $132|Avg: $15
95%
#1106
Core i5-2430M
MSRP: $225|Avg: N/A
95%
#1108
Pentium Dual Core T4500
MSRP: $150|Avg: $30
94%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Ryzen 5 3600

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
1410%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
1332%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
967%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
291%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
231%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
202%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
116%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
114%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
104%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
104%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
103%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
100%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
99%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
98%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
97%
#16
Core Ultra 5 225F
MSRP: $231|Avg: $150
95%
#17
Core Ultra 7 265K
MSRP: $309|Avg: $285
93%
#18
Ryzen 9 3900
MSRP: $499|Avg: $150
92%
#19
Ryzen 5 3600X
MSRP: $249|Avg: $90
91%
#20
Core i7-14700KF
MSRP: $384|Avg: $260
91%
#21
Core i7-14700K
MSRP: $409|Avg: $270
88%
#22
Ryzen 5 4500
MSRP: $129|Avg: $85
85%
#23
Ryzen 5 5600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $115
85%
#24
Celeron G5925
MSRP: $62|Avg: $15
85%
#25
Ryzen 5 7500F
MSRP: $179|Avg: $145
83%
#26
Core Ultra 5 245
MSRP: $319|Avg: $220
83%
#27
Ryzen 7 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $86
82%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Generational Difference: This comparison involves processors from different technological eras. The Ryzen 5 3600 (2019) utilizes 7 nm, 12 nm technology and **DDR4 Dual-channel**, providing a fundamental performance advantage.
InsightCeleron 847Ryzen 5 3600
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
More affordable ($15)
⚠️ Higher cost ($80)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) / 32 nm)
✨ Modern (Matisse (2019−2020) / 7 nm, 12 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Celeron 847 (2011) relies on 32 nm technology and DDR3, placing it in a different performance category relative to modern standards.
InsightCeleron 847Ryzen 5 3600
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Better overall value (+161%)
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($15)
⚠️ Higher cost ($80)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Celeron 847 and Ryzen 5 3600

Intel

Celeron 847

The Celeron 847 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 19 June 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.1 GHz, with boost up to 1.1 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1023. Thermal design power (TDP): 17 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,270 points. Launch price was $134.

AMD

Ryzen 5 3600

The Ryzen 5 3600 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 7 July 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Matisse (2019−2020) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.2 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 17,685 points. Launch price was $199.

Processing Power

The Celeron 847 packs 2 cores / 2 threads, while the Ryzen 5 3600 offers 6 cores / 12 threads — the Ryzen 5 3600 has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 1.1 GHz on the Celeron 847 versus 4.2 GHz on the Ryzen 5 3600 — a 117% clock advantage for the Ryzen 5 3600 (base: 1.1 GHz vs 3.6 GHz). The Celeron 847 uses the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture (32 nm), while the Ryzen 5 3600 uses Matisse (2019−2020) (7 nm, 12 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron 847 scores 1,270 against the Ryzen 5 3600's 17,685 — a 173.2% lead for the Ryzen 5 3600. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 196 vs 1,295, a 147.4% lead for the Ryzen 5 3600 that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 354 vs 1,898 (137.1% advantage for the Ryzen 5 3600). L3 cache: 2 MB (total) on the Celeron 847 vs 32 MB (total) on the Ryzen 5 3600.

FeatureCeleron 847Ryzen 5 3600
Cores / Threads
2 / 2
6 / 12+200%
Boost Clock
1.1 GHz
4.2 GHz+282%
Base Clock
1.1 GHz
3.6 GHz+227%
L3 Cache
2 MB (total)
32 MB (total)+1500%
L2 Cache
256K (per core)
512K (per core)+100%
Process
32 nm
7 nm, 12 nm-78%
Architecture
Sandy Bridge (2011−2013)
Matisse (2019−2020)
PassMark
1,270
17,685+1293%
Cinebench R23 Multi
9,500
Geekbench 6 Single
196
1,295+561%
Geekbench 6 Multi
354
1,898+436%
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron 847 uses the BGA1023 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Ryzen 5 3600 uses AM4 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3-1333 on the Celeron 847 versus DDR4-3200 on the Ryzen 5 3600 — the Ryzen 5 3600 supports 28.6% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Ryzen 5 3600 supports up to 128 GB of RAM compared to 16 GB 155.6% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 16 (Celeron 847) vs 24 (Ryzen 5 3600) — the Ryzen 5 3600 offers 8 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: HM65,HM67 (Celeron 847) and AMD B550,AMD X570,AMD B450,AMD X470 (Ryzen 5 3600).

FeatureCeleron 847Ryzen 5 3600
Socket
BGA1023
AM4
PCIe Generation
PCIe 2.0
PCIe 4.0+100%
Max RAM Speed
DDR3-1333
DDR4-3200+33%
Max RAM Capacity
16 GB
128 GB+700%
RAM Channels
2
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
16
24+50%
🔧

Advanced Features

Only the Ryzen 5 3600 has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Virtualization support: VT-x (Celeron 847) vs Yes (Ryzen 5 3600). The Celeron 847 includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge)), while the Ryzen 5 3600 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron 847 targets Budget, Ryzen 5 3600 targets Gaming/Budget Workstation. Direct competitor: Celeron 847 rivals Pentium 967; Ryzen 5 3600 rivals Core i5-10400.

FeatureCeleron 847Ryzen 5 3600
Integrated GPU
Yes
No
IGPU Model
HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge)
Unlocked
No
Yes
AVX-512
No
No
Virtualization
VT-x
Yes
Target Use
Budget
Gaming/Budget Workstation
💰

Value Analysis

The Celeron 847 launched at $134 MSRP, while the Ryzen 5 3600 debuted at $199. At current prices ($15 vs $80), the Celeron 847 is $65 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Celeron 847 delivers 84.7 pts/$ vs 221.1 pts/$ for the Ryzen 5 3600 — making the Ryzen 5 3600 the 89.2% better value option.

FeatureCeleron 847Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP
$134-33%
$199
Avg Price (30d)
$15-81%
$80
Performance per Dollar
84.7
221.1+161%
Release Date
2011
2019