
Celeron 900

Ryzen 9 5900X
Celeron 900 vs Ryzen 9 5900X Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Celeron 900 vs Ryzen 9 5900X FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Celeron 900 vs Ryzen 9 5900X: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Celeron 900
2009Why buy it
- ✅Costs $463 less on MSRP ($86 MSRP vs $549 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 35W instead of 105W, a 70W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 9 5900X across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower Geekbench multi-core (229 vs 11,888).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (1 MB vs 64 MB).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 5.6 vs 71.0 PassMark/$ ($86 MSRP vs $549 MSRP).
Ryzen 9 5900X
2020Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +2198.0% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+6300% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 1 MB).
- ✅Delivers 1158.2% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 71.0 vs 5.6 PassMark/$ ($549 MSRP vs $86 MSRP).
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌538.4% HIGHER MSRP$549 MSRPvs$86 MSRP
- ❌200% higher power demand at 105W vs 35W.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 9 5900X better than Celeron 900?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Celeron 900 vs Ryzen 9 5900X Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Celeron 900
The Celeron 900 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. Base frequency: 2.2 GHz. L3 cache: 1 MB L2 Cache. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 485 points. Launch price was $69.


Ryzen 9 5900X
The Ryzen 9 5900X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 5 November 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Vermeer (Zen3) (2020−2022) architecture. It features 12 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 3.7 GHz, with boost up to 4.8 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 105 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 38,955 points. Launch price was $549.
Processing Power
The Ryzen 9 5900X is built on the Vermeer (Zen3) (2020−2022) architecture. In PassMark, the Celeron 900 scores 485 against the Ryzen 9 5900X's 38,955 — a 195.1% lead for the Ryzen 9 5900X. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 220 vs 2,174, a 163.2% lead for the Ryzen 9 5900X that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 229 vs 11,888 (192.4% advantage for the Ryzen 9 5900X). L3 cache: 1 MB L2 Cache on the Celeron 900 vs 64 MB on the Ryzen 9 5900X.
| Feature | Celeron 900 | Ryzen 9 5900X |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | — | 12 / 24 |
| Boost Clock | — | 4.8 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.2 GHz | 3.7 GHz+68% |
| L3 Cache | 1 MB L2 Cache | 64 MB+6300% |
| L2 Cache | — | 512K (per core) |
| Process | 45 nm | 7 nm, 12 nm-84% |
| Architecture | — | Vermeer (Zen3) (2020−2022) |
| PassMark | 485 | 38,955+7932% |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | — | 21,000 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 220 | 2,174+888% |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 229 | 11,888+5091% |
Memory & Platform
The Celeron 900 uses the PGA478 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Ryzen 9 5900X uses AM4 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3-1333 on the Celeron 900 versus DDR4-3200 on the Ryzen 9 5900X — the Ryzen 9 5900X supports 140.1% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Ryzen 9 5900X supports up to 128 GB of RAM compared to 4 GB — 3100% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 1 (Celeron 900) vs 2 (Ryzen 9 5900X). PCIe lanes: 0 (Celeron 900) vs 24 (Ryzen 9 5900X) — the Ryzen 9 5900X offers 24 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: GL40,GM45 (Celeron 900) and A320,B350,X370,B450,X470,B550,X570 (Ryzen 9 5900X).
| Feature | Celeron 900 | Ryzen 9 5900X |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | PGA478 | AM4 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 2.0 | PCIe 4.0+100% |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR3-1333 | DDR4-3200+140% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 4 GB | 128 GB+3100% |
| RAM Channels | 1 | 2+100% |
| ECC Support | No | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 0 | 24 |
Advanced Features
Only the Ryzen 9 5900X has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Virtualization support: No (Celeron 900) vs AMD-V (Ryzen 9 5900X). Primary use case: Celeron 900 targets Budget, Ryzen 9 5900X targets Workstation. Direct competitor: Celeron 900 rivals Pentium 4 2.80; Ryzen 9 5900X rivals Core i9-12900K.
| Feature | Celeron 900 | Ryzen 9 5900X |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| Unlocked | No | Yes |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | No | AMD-V |
| Target Use | Budget | Workstation |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Celeron 900 was priced at $86, while the Ryzen 9 5900X came in at $549. On launch pricing ($86 vs $549), Celeron 900 was $463 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Celeron 900 delivers 5.6 pts/$ vs 71.0 pts/$ for the Ryzen 9 5900X — making the Ryzen 9 5900X the 170.5% better value option.
| Feature | Celeron 900 | Ryzen 9 5900X |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $86-84% | $549 |
| Performance per Dollar | 5.6 | 71.0+1168% |
| Release Date | 2009 | 2020 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.














