Celeron B710 vs Phenom II X4 810

CPU

GPU

Celeron B710

1 Cores1 Thrd35 WWMax: 1.6 GHz2011

Similar parts

·······

Buy on Amazon

Phenom II X4 810

4 Cores4 Thrd95 WWMax: 2.6 GHz2009

Similar parts

·······

Buy on Amazon

Celeron B710 vs Phenom II X4 810 Performance Spectrum

Celeron B710

1 / 1

2,051

+0.7%

2,036

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Celeron B710 vs Phenom II X4 810 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Celeron B710 vs Phenom II X4 810: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Celeron B710

2011

Why buy it

✅+0.7% higher PassMark.
✅Costs $89 less on MSRP ($86 MSRP vs $175 MSRP).
✅Delivers 105.0% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 23.8 vs 11.6 PassMark/$ ($86 MSRP vs $175 MSRP).
✅Draws 35W instead of 95W, a 60W reduction.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Smaller total L3 cache (1.5 MB vs 4 MB).

Phenom II X4 810

2009

Why buy it

✅+166.7% larger total L3 cache (4 MB vs 1.5 MB).

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (2,036 vs 2,051).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 11.6 vs 23.8 PassMark/$ ($175 MSRP vs $86 MSRP).
❌171.4% higher power demand at 95W vs 35W.
❌No integrated graphics, while Celeron B710 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Celeron B710 better than Phenom II X4 810?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Phenom II X4 810 is ahead with a 0.5% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Celeron B710 pulls ahead with 0.7% better PassMark. Phenom II X4 810 also has the bigger cache pool with 166.7% larger total L3 cache (4 MB vs 1.5 MB).

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Celeron B710 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.7% better PassMark, backed by 1 cores and 1 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Celeron B710 is the better buy right now. Celeron B710 comes in $89 cheaper on MSRP at $86 MSRP versus $175 MSRP, and it still gives you 0.7% better PassMark. The compromise is that Phenom II X4 810 is still the better pure gaming CPU with a 0.5% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 105.0% better value on MSRP (23.8 vs 11.6 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Celeron B710 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2011 vs 2009) and more multi-core headroom with 1 cores / 1 threads instead of 4/4. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Celeron B710 vs Phenom II X4 810 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Celeron B710

The Celeron B710 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 19 June 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Base frequency is 1.6 GHz, with boost up to 1.6 GHz. L3 cache: 1.5 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: PGA988. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,051 points. Launch price was $70.

Phenom II X4 810

The Phenom II X4 810 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 9 February 2009 (16 years ago). It is based on the Deneb (2009−2011) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.6 GHz, with boost up to 2.6 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: AM3. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,036 points. Launch price was $116.

⚡

Processing Power

The Celeron B710 packs 1 cores / 1 threads, while the Phenom II X4 810 offers 4 cores / 4 threads — the Phenom II X4 810 has 3 more cores. Boost clocks reach 1.6 GHz on the Celeron B710 versus 2.6 GHz on the Phenom II X4 810 — a 47.6% clock advantage for the Phenom II X4 810 (base: 1.6 GHz vs 2.6 GHz). The Celeron B710 uses the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture (32 nm), while the Phenom II X4 810 uses Deneb (2009−2011) (45 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron B710 scores 2,051 against the Phenom II X4 810's 2,036 — a 0.7% lead for the Celeron B710. L3 cache: 1.5 MB (total) on the Celeron B710 vs 4 MB (total) on the Phenom II X4 810.

Feature	Celeron B710	Phenom II X4 810
Cores / Threads	1 / 1	4 / 4+300%
Boost Clock	1.6 GHz	2.6 GHz+63%
Base Clock	1.6 GHz	2.6 GHz+63%
L3 Cache	1.5 MB (total)	4 MB (total)+167%
L2 Cache	256K (per core)	512 kB (per core)+100%
Process	32 nm-29%	45 nm
Architecture	Sandy Bridge (2011−2013)	Deneb (2009−2011)
PassMark	2,051	2,036
Geekbench 6 Single	231	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	196	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron B710 uses the PGA988 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Phenom II X4 810 uses AM3 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Celeron B710	Phenom II X4 810
Socket	PGA988	AM3
PCIe Generation	PCIe 2.0	PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR3-1333	—
Max RAM Capacity	16 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	16	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x (Celeron B710) / not specified (Phenom II X4 810). The Celeron B710 includes integrated graphics (Intel HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge)), while the Phenom II X4 810 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron B710 targets Laptop. Direct competitor: Celeron B710 rivals Pentium 967.

Feature	Celeron B710	Phenom II X4 810
Integrated GPU	Yes	—
IGPU Model	Intel HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge)	—
Unlocked	No	—
AVX-512	No	—
Virtualization	VT-x	—
Target Use	Laptop	—

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Celeron B710 was priced at $86, while the Phenom II X4 810 came in at $175. On launch pricing ($86 vs $175), Celeron B710 was $89 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Celeron B710 delivers 23.8 pts/$ vs 11.6 pts/$ for the Phenom II X4 810 — making the Celeron B710 the 68.8% better value option.

Feature	Celeron B710	Phenom II X4 810
MSRP	$86-51%	$175
Performance per Dollar	23.8+105%	11.6
Release Date	2011	2009

Search Celeron B710 on Amazon

Search Phenom II X4 810 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.