Celeron G1820TE
VS
Celeron 3205U

Celeron G1820TE vs Celeron 3205U

Intel

Celeron G1820TE

2 Cores2 Thrd54 WWMax: 2.2 GHz2013
VS
Intel

Celeron 3205U

2 Cores2 Thrd512 WWMax: 1.5 GHz2015

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Celeron G1820TE is positioned at rank 679 and the Celeron 3205U is on rank 279, so the Celeron 3205U offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Celeron G1820TE

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
12224%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
11551%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
8387%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
2527%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
2001%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
1751%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
1003%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
990%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
901%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
901%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
891%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
867%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
855%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
851%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
844%
#679
Celeron G1820TE
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#680
Pentium G3420T
MSRP: $75|Avg: $40
100%
#681
Core i5-3570
MSRP: $194|Avg: $35
100%
#682
Pentium G3450T
MSRP: $75|Avg: $45
100%
#683
Celeron E3200
MSRP: $43|Avg: $5
99%
#684
Core i5-3470
MSRP: $184|Avg: $55
99%
#685
Core i5-3450S
MSRP: $174|Avg: $20
99%
#686
Core i7-5820K
MSRP: $389|Avg: $103
99%
#687
Core i3-4330
MSRP: $138|Avg: $60
99%
#689
Core i7-7700T
MSRP: $303|Avg: $75
97%
#690
Core i3-4150T
MSRP: $117|Avg: $30
97%
#691
Core i7-3770S
MSRP: $250|Avg: $250
97%
#692
Core i7-6800K
MSRP: $434|Avg: $120
97%
#693
Core i5-4670S
MSRP: $213|Avg: $30
97%
#694
Core i5-3550
MSRP: $194|Avg: $30
97%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Celeron 3205U

#82
Core i7-11700B
MSRP: $323|Avg: $311
98%
#83
Core i7-13700HX
MSRP: $485|Avg: N/A
97%
#266
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
429%
#267
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
423%
#268
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
388%
#269
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
387%
#270
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
383%
#272
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
370%
#273
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
355%
#274
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
354%
#275
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
345%
#279
Celeron 3205U
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Trade-off: The Celeron G1820TE leads in gaming performance. However, the Celeron 3205U is the stronger candidate for professional workloads, offering 0.5% greater multi-core processing power.
InsightCeleron G1820TECeleron 3205U
Gaming
Superior gaming performance
Lower gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Haswell (2013−2015) / 22 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Broadwell-U (2015) / 14 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

InsightCeleron G1820TECeleron 3205U
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Celeron G1820TE and Celeron 3205U

Intel

Celeron G1820TE

The Celeron G1820TE is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 2.2 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1150. Thermal design power (TDP): 54 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,020 points. Launch price was $69.

Intel

Celeron 3205U

The Celeron 3205U is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 March 2015 (10 years ago). It is based on the Broadwell-U (2015) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.5 GHz, with boost up to 1.5 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1168. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,025 points. Launch price was $107.

Processing Power

Both the Celeron G1820TE and Celeron 3205U share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2.2 GHz on the Celeron G1820TE versus 1.5 GHz on the Celeron 3205U — a 37.8% clock advantage for the Celeron G1820TE (base: 2.2 GHz vs 1.5 GHz). The Celeron G1820TE uses the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture (22 nm), while the Celeron 3205U uses Broadwell-U (2015) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron G1820TE scores 1,020 against the Celeron 3205U's 1,025 — a 0.5% lead for the Celeron 3205U. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 415 vs 287, a 36.5% lead for the Celeron G1820TE that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 629 vs 483 (26.3% advantage for the Celeron G1820TE). L3 cache: 3 MB (total) on the Celeron G1820TE vs 2 MB (total) on the Celeron 3205U.

FeatureCeleron G1820TECeleron 3205U
Cores / Threads
2 / 2
2 / 2
Boost Clock
2.2 GHz+47%
1.5 GHz
Base Clock
2.2 GHz+47%
1.5 GHz
L3 Cache
3 MB (total)+50%
2 MB (total)
L2 Cache
256 kB (per core)
256K (per core)
Process
22 nm
14 nm-36%
Architecture
Haswell (2013−2015)
Broadwell-U (2015)
PassMark
1,020
1,025
Geekbench 6 Single
415+45%
287
Geekbench 6 Multi
629+30%
483
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron G1820TE uses the LGA1150 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Celeron 3205U uses FCBGA1168 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR3-1333 memory speed. The Celeron G1820TE supports up to 32 GB of RAM compared to 16 GB 66.7% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 16 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: H81,B85,H87,Z87,H97,Z97 (Celeron G1820TE) and Wildcat Point-LP (Celeron 3205U).

FeatureCeleron G1820TECeleron 3205U
Socket
LGA1150
FCBGA1168
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0
PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR3-1333
DDR3L-1600
Max RAM Capacity
32 GB+100%
16 GB
RAM Channels
2
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
16
16
🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Both support VT-x virtualization. Both include integrated graphics HD Graphics (Haswell) (Celeron G1820TE) and HD Graphics (Broadwell) (Celeron 3205U) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron G1820TE targets Budget, Celeron 3205U targets Budget. Direct competitor: Celeron G1820TE rivals Pentium G3220T; Celeron 3205U rivals Pentium 2117U.

FeatureCeleron G1820TECeleron 3205U
Integrated GPU
Yes
Yes
IGPU Model
HD Graphics (Haswell)
HD Graphics (Broadwell)
Unlocked
No
No
AVX-512
No
No
Virtualization
VT-x
VT-x
Target Use
Budget
Budget