PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Celeron G3920 vs Core i7-3537U FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Celeron G3920 vs Core i7-3537U: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Celeron G3920

2015

Why buy it

✅+0.4% higher PassMark.
✅Costs $306 less on MSRP ($40 MSRP vs $346 MSRP).
✅Delivers 768.3% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 59.0 vs 6.8 PassMark/$ ($40 MSRP vs $346 MSRP).
✅Draws 51W instead of 512W, a 461W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.

Core i7-3537U

2013

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (2,349 vs 2,358).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 6.8 vs 59.0 PassMark/$ ($346 MSRP vs $40 MSRP).
❌903.9% higher power demand at 512W vs 51W.

Quick Answers

So, is Celeron G3920 better than Core i7-3537U?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Core i7-3537U is ahead with a 1.5% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Celeron G3920 pulls ahead with 0.4% better PassMark.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Celeron G3920 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.4% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Celeron G3920 is the better buy right now. Celeron G3920 comes in $306 cheaper on MSRP at $40 MSRP versus $346 MSRP, and it still gives you 0.4% better PassMark. The compromise is that Core i7-3537U is still the better pure gaming CPU with a 1.5% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 768.3% better value on MSRP (59.0 vs 6.8 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Celeron G3920 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2015 vs 2013) and more multi-core headroom with 2 cores / 2 threads instead of 2/4. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Celeron G3920 vs Core i7-3537U Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Celeron G3920

The Celeron G3920 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 September 2015 (10 years ago). It is based on the Skylake (2015−2016) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 2.9 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 51 Watt. Memory support: DDR3, DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 2,358 points. Launch price was $52.

Core i7-3537U

The Core i7-3537U is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 8 January 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 3.1 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1023. Thermal design power (TDP): 17 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,349 points. Launch price was $346.

⚡

Processing Power

The Celeron G3920 packs 2 cores / 2 threads, matching the Core i7-3537U's 2 cores. Boost clocks reach 2.9 GHz on the Celeron G3920 versus 3.1 GHz on the Core i7-3537U — a 6.7% clock advantage for the Core i7-3537U (base: 2.9 GHz vs 2 GHz). The Celeron G3920 uses the Skylake (2015−2016) architecture (14 nm), while the Core i7-3537U uses Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron G3920 scores 2,358 against the Core i7-3537U's 2,349 — a 0.4% lead for the Celeron G3920. Both processors carry 4 MB (total) of L3 cache.

Feature	Celeron G3920	Core i7-3537U
Cores / Threads	2 / 2	2 / 4
Boost Clock	2.9 GHz	3.1 GHz+7%
Base Clock	2.9 GHz+45%	2 GHz
L3 Cache	4 MB (total)	4 MB (total)
L2 Cache	256K (per core)	256K (per core)
Process	14 nm-36%	22 nm
Architecture	Skylake (2015−2016)	Ivy Bridge (2012−2013)
PassMark	2,358	2,349
Geekbench 6 Single	699	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	948	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron G3920 uses the LGA1151 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i7-3537U uses BGA1023 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-2133 on the Celeron G3920 versus 1600 on the Core i7-3537U — the Celeron G3920 supports 33.3% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Celeron G3920 supports up to 64 GB of RAM compared to 32 GB — 100% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 16 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: H110,B150,H170,Z170 (Celeron G3920) and HM76,UM77,QM77,QS77 (Core i7-3537U).

Feature	Celeron G3920	Core i7-3537U
Socket	LGA1151	BGA1023
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR4-2133+33%	1600
Max RAM Capacity	64 GB+100%	32 GB
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	Yes	No
PCIe Lanes	16	16

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: VT-x (Celeron G3920) vs true (Core i7-3537U). Both include integrated graphics — HD Graphics 510 (Celeron G3920) and Intel HD Graphics 4000 (Core i7-3537U) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron G3920 targets Budget. Direct competitor: Celeron G3920 rivals Pentium G4400; Core i7-3537U rivals AMD A10-4655M.

Feature	Celeron G3920	Core i7-3537U
Integrated GPU	Yes	Yes
IGPU Model	HD Graphics 510	Intel HD Graphics 4000
Unlocked	No	No
AVX-512	No	No
Virtualization	VT-x	true
Target Use	Budget	—

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Celeron G3920 was priced at $40, while the Core i7-3537U came in at $346. On launch pricing ($40 vs $346), Celeron G3920 was $306 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Celeron G3920 delivers 59.0 pts/$ vs 6.8 pts/$ for the Core i7-3537U — making the Celeron G3920 the 158.7% better value option.

Feature	Celeron G3920	Core i7-3537U
MSRP	$40-88%	$346
Performance per Dollar	59.0+768%	6.8
Release Date	2015	2013

Search Celeron G3920 on Amazon

Search Core i7-3537U on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.