Celeron G3930T vs Ryzen 9 5900X

CPU

GPU

Celeron G3930T

2 Cores2 Thrd35 WWMax: 2.7 GHz2017

Similar parts

·······

Buy on Amazon

Ryzen 9 5900X

12 Cores24 Thrd105 WWMax: 4.8 GHz2020

Ryzen family

·······

Buy on Amazon

Celeron G3930T vs Ryzen 9 5900X Performance Spectrum

Celeron G3930T

2 / 2

2,023

0.0%

38,955

+1825.6%

Ryzen Threadripper 9960X

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9975WX

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Celeron G3930T vs Ryzen 9 5900X FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Celeron G3930T vs Ryzen 9 5900X: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Celeron G3930T

2017

Why buy it

✅Costs $507 less on MSRP ($42 MSRP vs $549 MSRP).
✅Draws 35W instead of 105W, a 70W reduction.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel HD Graphics 610, while Ryzen 9 5900X needs a discrete GPU.
✅Includes a boxed cooler (Intel Stock), unlike Ryzen 9 5900X.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 9 5900X across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower Geekbench multi-core (1,350 vs 11,888).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (2 MB vs 64 MB).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 48.2 vs 71.0 PassMark/$ ($42 MSRP vs $549 MSRP).

Ryzen 9 5900X

2020

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +476.4% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+3100% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 2 MB).
✅Delivers 47.3% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 71.0 vs 48.2 PassMark/$ ($549 MSRP vs $42 MSRP).
✅50% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 16) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌
1207.1% HIGHER MSRP
$549 MSRPvs$42 MSRP
❌200% higher power demand at 105W vs 35W.
❌No integrated graphics, while Celeron G3930T can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Celeron G3930T.

Quick Answers

So, is Ryzen 9 5900X better than Celeron G3930T?

Yes. Ryzen 9 5900X is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 476.4% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 780.6% better Geekbench multi-core, 1825.6% higher PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Ryzen 9 5900X is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 476.4% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Ryzen 9 5900X is the stronger fit. You are getting 780.6% better Geekbench multi-core, backed by 12 cores and 24 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 3100% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 2 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Ryzen 9 5900X is the better buy right now. Ryzen 9 5900X comes in 1207.1% more expensive on MSRP at $549 MSRP versus $42 MSRP, and it still gives you a 476.4% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 47.3% better value on MSRP (71.0 vs 48.2 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Ryzen 9 5900X makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2020 vs 2017), 3100% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 2 MB), and more multi-core headroom with 12 cores / 24 threads instead of 2/2. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Celeron G3930T vs Ryzen 9 5900X Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Celeron G3930T

The Celeron G3930T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 January 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Kaby Lake (2016−2019) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.7 GHz, with boost up to 2.7 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 2133, DDR3L 1333/1600. Passmark benchmark score: 2,023 points. Launch price was $42.

Ryzen 9 5900X

The Ryzen 9 5900X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 5 November 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Vermeer (Zen3) (2020−2022) architecture. It features 12 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 3.7 GHz, with boost up to 4.8 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 105 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 38,955 points. Launch price was $549.

⚡

Processing Power

The Celeron G3930T packs 2 cores / 2 threads, while the Ryzen 9 5900X offers 12 cores / 24 threads — the Ryzen 9 5900X has 10 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2.7 GHz on the Celeron G3930T versus 4.8 GHz on the Ryzen 9 5900X — a 56% clock advantage for the Ryzen 9 5900X (base: 2.7 GHz vs 3.7 GHz). The Celeron G3930T uses the Kaby Lake (2016−2019) architecture (14 nm), while the Ryzen 9 5900X uses Vermeer (Zen3) (2020−2022) (7 nm, 12 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron G3930T scores 2,023 against the Ryzen 9 5900X's 38,955 — a 180.3% lead for the Ryzen 9 5900X. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 704 vs 2,174, a 102.2% lead for the Ryzen 9 5900X that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 1,350 vs 11,888 (159.2% advantage for the Ryzen 9 5900X). L3 cache: 2 MB (total) on the Celeron G3930T vs 64 MB on the Ryzen 9 5900X.

Feature	Celeron G3930T	Ryzen 9 5900X
Cores / Threads	2 / 2	12 / 24+500%
Boost Clock	2.7 GHz	4.8 GHz+78%
Base Clock	2.7 GHz	3.7 GHz+37%
L3 Cache	2 MB (total)	64 MB+3100%
L2 Cache	256K (per core)	512K (per core)+100%
Process	14 nm	7 nm, 12 nm-50%
Architecture	Kaby Lake (2016−2019)	Vermeer (Zen3) (2020−2022)
PassMark	2,023	38,955+1826%
Cinebench R23 Multi	—	21,000
Geekbench 6 Single	704	2,174+209%
Geekbench 6 Multi	1,350	11,888+781%

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron G3930T uses the LGA1151 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Ryzen 9 5900X uses AM4 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-2400 on the Celeron G3930T versus DDR4-3200 on the Ryzen 9 5900X — the Ryzen 9 5900X supports 33.3% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Ryzen 9 5900X supports up to 128 GB of RAM compared to 64 GB — 100% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 16 (Celeron G3930T) vs 24 (Ryzen 9 5900X) — the Ryzen 9 5900X offers 8 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: H110,B250,H270,Z270 (Celeron G3930T) and A320,B350,X370,B450,X470,B550,X570 (Ryzen 9 5900X).

Feature	Celeron G3930T	Ryzen 9 5900X
Socket	LGA1151	AM4
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 4.0+33%
Max RAM Speed	DDR4-2400	DDR4-3200+33%
Max RAM Capacity	64 GB	128 GB+100%
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	Yes	Yes
PCIe Lanes	16	24+50%

🔧

Advanced Features

Only the Ryzen 9 5900X has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Celeron G3930T) vs AMD-V (Ryzen 9 5900X). The Celeron G3930T includes integrated graphics (Intel HD Graphics 610), while the Ryzen 9 5900X requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron G3930T targets Desktop, Ryzen 9 5900X targets Workstation. Direct competitor: Celeron G3930T rivals Pentium G4560T; Ryzen 9 5900X rivals Core i9-12900K.

Feature	Celeron G3930T	Ryzen 9 5900X
Integrated GPU	Yes	No
IGPU Model	Intel HD Graphics 610	—
Unlocked	No	Yes
AVX-512	No	No
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d	AMD-V
Target Use	Desktop	Workstation

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Celeron G3930T was priced at $42, while the Ryzen 9 5900X came in at $549. On launch pricing ($42 vs $549), Celeron G3930T was $507 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Celeron G3930T delivers 48.2 pts/$ vs 71.0 pts/$ for the Ryzen 9 5900X — making the Ryzen 9 5900X the 38.3% better value option.

Feature	Celeron G3930T	Ryzen 9 5900X
MSRP	$42-92%	$549
Performance per Dollar	48.2	71.0+47%
Release Date	2017	2020

Search Celeron G3930T on Amazon

Search Ryzen 9 5900X on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.