Celeron G465 vs Pentium E6500

Intel

Celeron G465

1 Cores2 Thrd35 WWMax: 1.9 GHz2012
Similar parts
·······
VS
Intel

Pentium E6500

2 Cores2 Thrd65 WWMax: 0.93 GHz2009
Similar parts
·······

Celeron G465 vs Pentium E6500 Performance Spectrum

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Celeron G465 vs Pentium E6500 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Celeron G465 vs Pentium E6500: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Celeron G465

2012

Why buy it

  • Costs $14 less on MSRP ($70 MSRP vs $84 MSRP).
  • Delivers 21.0% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 16.9 vs 14.0 PassMark/$ ($70 MSRP vs $84 MSRP).
  • Draws 35W instead of 65W, a 30W reduction.
  • 100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
  • Integrated graphics onboard with HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge), while Pentium E6500 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

  • Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.

Pentium E6500

2009

Why buy it

    Trade-offs

    • Lower PassMark (1,175 vs 1,185).
    • Lower PassMark per dollar, at 14.0 vs 16.9 PassMark/$ ($84 MSRP vs $70 MSRP).
    • 85.7% higher power demand at 65W vs 35W.
    • No integrated graphics, while Celeron G465 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

    Quick Answers

    So, is Celeron G465 better than Pentium E6500?
    Yes. Celeron G465 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 0.9% average FPS lead across 49 shared CPU game tests in our data, 0.9% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.
    Which one is better for gaming?
    If gaming is the priority, Celeron G465 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 0.9% more average FPS across 49 shared CPU game tests.
    Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
    For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Celeron G465 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.9% better PassMark, backed by 1 cores and 2 threads.
    Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
    Celeron G465 is the better buy right now. Celeron G465 comes in $14 cheaper on MSRP at $70 MSRP versus $84 MSRP, and it still gives you a 0.9% average FPS lead across 49 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 21.0% better value on MSRP (16.9 vs 14.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.
    Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
    Celeron G465 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2012 vs 2009) and more multi-core headroom with 1 cores / 2 threads instead of 2/2. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

    Celeron G465 vs Pentium E6500 Technical Specifications

    Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

    Intel

    Celeron G465

    The Celeron G465 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 September 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture. It features 1 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.9 GHz, with boost up to 1.9 GHz. L3 cache: 1.5 MB. L2 cache: 256 kB. Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1155. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,185 points. Launch price was $80.

    Intel

    Pentium E6500

    The Pentium E6500 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 9 August 2009 (16 years ago). It is based on the Wolfdale (2008−2010) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.93 GHz, with boost up to 0.93 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 2 MB (total). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: LGA775. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR1, DDR2, DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,175 points. Launch price was $50.

    Processing Power

    The Celeron G465 packs 1 cores / 2 threads, while the Pentium E6500 offers 2 cores / 2 threads — the Pentium E6500 has 1 more core. Boost clocks reach 1.9 GHz on the Celeron G465 versus 0.93 GHz on the Pentium E6500 — a 68.6% clock advantage for the Celeron G465 (base: 1.9 GHz vs 2.93 GHz). The Celeron G465 uses the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture (32 nm), while the Pentium E6500 uses Wolfdale (2008−2010) (45 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron G465 scores 1,185 against the Pentium E6500's 1,175 — a 0.8% lead for the Celeron G465. L3 cache: 1.5 MB on the Celeron G465 vs 0 kB on the Pentium E6500.

    FeatureCeleron G465Pentium E6500
    Cores / Threads
    1 / 2
    2 / 2+100%
    Boost Clock
    1.9 GHz+104%
    0.93 GHz
    Base Clock
    1.9 GHz
    2.93 GHz+54%
    L3 Cache
    1.5 MB
    0 kB
    L2 Cache
    256 kB
    2 MB (total)+700%
    Process
    32 nm-29%
    45 nm
    Architecture
    Sandy Bridge (2011−2013)
    Wolfdale (2008−2010)
    PassMark
    1,185
    1,175
    Geekbench 6 Single
    300
    🧠

    Memory & Platform

    The Celeron G465 uses the LGA1155 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Pentium E6500 uses LGA775 (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

    FeatureCeleron G465Pentium E6500
    Socket
    LGA1155
    LGA775
    PCIe Generation
    PCIe 2.0+82%
    PCIe 1.1
    Max RAM Speed
    DDR3-1066
    Max RAM Capacity
    32 GB
    RAM Channels
    2
    ECC Support
    No
    PCIe Lanes
    16
    🔧

    Advanced Features

    Virtualization: VT-x (Celeron G465) / not specified (Pentium E6500). The Celeron G465 includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge)), while the Pentium E6500 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron G465 targets Budget. Direct competitor: Celeron G465 rivals Pentium G630.

    FeatureCeleron G465Pentium E6500
    Integrated GPU
    Yes
    IGPU Model
    HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge)
    Unlocked
    No
    AVX-512
    No
    Virtualization
    VT-x
    Target Use
    Budget
    💰

    Value Analysis

    At launch, the Celeron G465 was priced at $70, while the Pentium E6500 came in at $84. On launch pricing ($70 vs $84), Celeron G465 was $14 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Celeron G465 delivers 16.9 pts/$ vs 14.0 pts/$ for the Pentium E6500 — making the Celeron G465 the 19% better value option.

    FeatureCeleron G465Pentium E6500
    MSRP
    $70-17%
    $84
    Performance per Dollar
    16.9+21%
    14.0
    Release Date
    2012
    2009

    Affiliate Disclosure

    ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

    Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.