
Celeron G465

Pentium E6500
Celeron G465 vs Pentium E6500 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Celeron G465 vs Pentium E6500 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Celeron G465 vs Pentium E6500: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Celeron G465
2012Why buy it
- ✅Costs $14 less on MSRP ($70 MSRP vs $84 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 21.0% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 16.9 vs 14.0 PassMark/$ ($70 MSRP vs $84 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 35W instead of 65W, a 30W reduction.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge), while Pentium E6500 needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.
Pentium E6500
2009Why buy it
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (1,175 vs 1,185).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 14.0 vs 16.9 PassMark/$ ($84 MSRP vs $70 MSRP).
- ❌85.7% higher power demand at 65W vs 35W.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Celeron G465 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is Celeron G465 better than Pentium E6500?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Celeron G465 vs Pentium E6500 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Celeron G465
The Celeron G465 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 September 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture. It features 1 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.9 GHz, with boost up to 1.9 GHz. L3 cache: 1.5 MB. L2 cache: 256 kB. Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1155. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,185 points. Launch price was $80.

Pentium E6500
The Pentium E6500 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 9 August 2009 (16 years ago). It is based on the Wolfdale (2008−2010) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.93 GHz, with boost up to 0.93 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 2 MB (total). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: LGA775. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR1, DDR2, DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,175 points. Launch price was $50.
Processing Power
The Celeron G465 packs 1 cores / 2 threads, while the Pentium E6500 offers 2 cores / 2 threads — the Pentium E6500 has 1 more core. Boost clocks reach 1.9 GHz on the Celeron G465 versus 0.93 GHz on the Pentium E6500 — a 68.6% clock advantage for the Celeron G465 (base: 1.9 GHz vs 2.93 GHz). The Celeron G465 uses the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture (32 nm), while the Pentium E6500 uses Wolfdale (2008−2010) (45 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron G465 scores 1,185 against the Pentium E6500's 1,175 — a 0.8% lead for the Celeron G465. L3 cache: 1.5 MB on the Celeron G465 vs 0 kB on the Pentium E6500.
| Feature | Celeron G465 | Pentium E6500 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 1 / 2 | 2 / 2+100% |
| Boost Clock | 1.9 GHz+104% | 0.93 GHz |
| Base Clock | 1.9 GHz | 2.93 GHz+54% |
| L3 Cache | 1.5 MB | 0 kB |
| L2 Cache | 256 kB | 2 MB (total)+700% |
| Process | 32 nm-29% | 45 nm |
| Architecture | Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) | Wolfdale (2008−2010) |
| PassMark | 1,185 | 1,175 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 300 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Celeron G465 uses the LGA1155 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Pentium E6500 uses LGA775 (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Celeron G465 | Pentium E6500 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1155 | LGA775 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 2.0+82% | PCIe 1.1 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR3-1066 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 32 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | No | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: VT-x (Celeron G465) / not specified (Pentium E6500). The Celeron G465 includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge)), while the Pentium E6500 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron G465 targets Budget. Direct competitor: Celeron G465 rivals Pentium G630.
| Feature | Celeron G465 | Pentium E6500 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | — |
| IGPU Model | HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge) | — |
| Unlocked | No | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | VT-x | — |
| Target Use | Budget | — |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Celeron G465 was priced at $70, while the Pentium E6500 came in at $84. On launch pricing ($70 vs $84), Celeron G465 was $14 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Celeron G465 delivers 16.9 pts/$ vs 14.0 pts/$ for the Pentium E6500 — making the Celeron G465 the 19% better value option.
| Feature | Celeron G465 | Pentium E6500 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $70-17% | $84 |
| Performance per Dollar | 16.9+21% | 14.0 |
| Release Date | 2012 | 2009 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.














