Celeron G465 vs Pentium T4400
Celeron G465
Pentium T4400
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Celeron G465 is positioned at rank 867 and the Pentium T4400 is on rank 1054, so the Celeron G465 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Celeron G465
Performance Per Dollar Pentium T4400
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Celeron G465 | Pentium T4400 |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ✅ Superior gaming performance | ❌ Lower gaming performance |
| Workstation | ✅ Better multi-core power | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks |
| Price | ⚠️ Higher cost ($37) | ✅ More affordable ($5) |
| Longevity | 🛑 Legacy (Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) / 32 nm) | 🛑 Legacy (Legacy / 45 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Celeron G465 | Pentium T4400 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+634%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️ Higher cost ($37) | ✅ More affordable ($5) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Celeron G465 and Pentium T4400
Celeron G465
The Celeron G465 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 September 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture. It features 1 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.9 GHz, with boost up to 1.9 GHz. L3 cache: 1.5 MB. L2 cache: 256 kB. Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1155. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,185 points. Launch price was $80.
Pentium T4400
The Pentium T4400 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. Base frequency: 2.2 GHz. L3 cache: 1 MB L2 Cache. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 1,175 points. Launch price was $69.
Processing Power
The Celeron G465 is built on the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture. In PassMark, the Celeron G465 scores 1,185 against the Pentium T4400's 1,175 — a 0.8% lead for the Celeron G465. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 300 vs 249, a 18.6% lead for the Celeron G465 that directly translates to higher frame rates. L3 cache: 1.5 MB on the Celeron G465 vs 1 MB L2 Cache on the Pentium T4400.
| Feature | Celeron G465 | Pentium T4400 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 1 / 2 | — |
| Boost Clock | 1.9 GHz | — |
| Base Clock | 1.9 GHz | 2.2 GHz+16% |
| L3 Cache | 1.5 MB+50% | 1 MB L2 Cache |
| L2 Cache | 256 kB | — |
| Process | 32 nm-29% | 45 nm |
| Architecture | Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) | — |
| PassMark | 1,185 | 1,175 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 300+20% | 249 |
Memory & Platform
The Celeron G465 uses the LGA1155 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Pentium T4400 uses PGA478 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR3-1066 memory speed. The Celeron G465 supports up to 32 GB of RAM compared to 8 GB — 120% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 16 (Celeron G465) vs 0 (Pentium T4400) — the Celeron G465 offers 16 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: H61,B65,H67,Z68 (Celeron G465) and GL40,GM45 (Pentium T4400).
| Feature | Celeron G465 | Pentium T4400 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1155 | PGA478 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 2.0 | PCIe 2.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR3-1066 | DDR3-800 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 32 GB+300% | 8 GB |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | ❌ | ❌ |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | 0 |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: VT-x (Celeron G465) vs None (Pentium T4400). The Celeron G465 includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge)), while the Pentium T4400 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron G465 targets Budget, Pentium T4400 targets Budget. Direct competitor: Celeron G465 rivals Pentium G630; Pentium T4400 rivals AMD A4-3300M.
| Feature | Celeron G465 | Pentium T4400 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | No |
| IGPU Model | HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge) | — |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | VT-x | None |
| Target Use | Budget | Budget |
Value Analysis
The Celeron G465 launched at $70 MSRP, while the Pentium T4400 debuted at $107. At current prices ($37 vs $5), the Pentium T4400 is $32 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Celeron G465 delivers 32.0 pts/$ vs 235.0 pts/$ for the Pentium T4400 — making the Pentium T4400 the 152% better value option.
| Feature | Celeron G465 | Pentium T4400 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $70-35% | $107 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $37 | $5-86% |
| Performance per Dollar | 32.0 | 235.0+634% |
| Release Date | 2012 | 2009 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Celeron G465 and Pentium T4400
