PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Celeron G465 vs Pentium T4400 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Celeron G465 vs Pentium T4400: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Celeron G465

2012

Why buy it

✅+20.5% higher Geekbench single-core performance for gaming and desktop responsiveness.
✅+50% larger total L3 cache (1.5 MB vs 1 MB).
✅Costs $37 less on MSRP ($70 MSRP vs $107 MSRP).
✅Delivers 54.2% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 16.9 vs 11.0 PassMark/$ ($70 MSRP vs $107 MSRP).
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.

Pentium T4400

2009

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌Lower Geekbench single-core performance for gaming (249 vs 300).
❌Lower PassMark (1,175 vs 1,185).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (1 MB vs 1.5 MB).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 11.0 vs 16.9 PassMark/$ ($107 MSRP vs $70 MSRP).
❌No integrated graphics, while Celeron G465 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Celeron G465 better than Pentium T4400?

Yes. Celeron G465 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 0.8% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 0.9% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Celeron G465 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 0.8% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Celeron G465 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.9% better PassMark, backed by 1 cores and 2 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 50% larger total L3 cache (1.5 MB vs 1 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Celeron G465 is the better buy right now. Celeron G465 comes in $37 cheaper on MSRP at $70 MSRP versus $107 MSRP, and it still gives you a 0.8% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 54.2% better value on MSRP (16.9 vs 11.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Celeron G465 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2012 vs 2009) and 50% larger total L3 cache (1.5 MB vs 1 MB). That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Celeron G465 vs Pentium T4400 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Celeron G465

The Celeron G465 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 September 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture. It features 1 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.9 GHz, with boost up to 1.9 GHz. L3 cache: 1.5 MB. L2 cache: 256 kB. Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1155. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,185 points. Launch price was $80.

Pentium T4400

The Pentium T4400 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. Base frequency: 2.2 GHz. L3 cache: 1 MB L2 Cache. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 1,175 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Processing Power

The Celeron G465 is built on the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture. In PassMark, the Celeron G465 scores 1,185 against the Pentium T4400's 1,175 — a 0.8% lead for the Celeron G465. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 300 vs 249, a 18.6% lead for the Celeron G465 that directly translates to higher frame rates. L3 cache: 1.5 MB on the Celeron G465 vs 1 MB L2 Cache on the Pentium T4400.

Feature	Celeron G465	Pentium T4400
Cores / Threads	1 / 2	—
Boost Clock	1.9 GHz	—
Base Clock	1.9 GHz	2.2 GHz+16%
L3 Cache	1.5 MB+50%	1 MB L2 Cache
L2 Cache	256 kB	—
Process	32 nm-29%	45 nm
Architecture	Sandy Bridge (2011−2013)	—
PassMark	1,185	1,175
Geekbench 6 Single	300+20%	249

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron G465 uses the LGA1155 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Pentium T4400 uses PGA478 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3-1066 on the Celeron G465 versus DDR3-800 on the Pentium T4400 — the Celeron G465 supports 33.3% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Celeron G465 supports up to 32 GB of RAM compared to 8 GB — 300% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 16 (Celeron G465) vs 0 (Pentium T4400) — the Celeron G465 offers 16 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: H61,B65,H67,Z68 (Celeron G465) and GL40,GM45 (Pentium T4400).

Feature	Celeron G465	Pentium T4400
Socket	LGA1155	PGA478
PCIe Generation	PCIe 2.0	PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR3-1066+33%	DDR3-800
Max RAM Capacity	32 GB+300%	8 GB
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	No	No
PCIe Lanes	16	0

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: VT-x (Celeron G465) vs None (Pentium T4400). The Celeron G465 includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge)), while the Pentium T4400 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron G465 targets Budget, Pentium T4400 targets Budget. Direct competitor: Celeron G465 rivals Pentium G630; Pentium T4400 rivals AMD A4-3300M.

Feature	Celeron G465	Pentium T4400
Integrated GPU	Yes	No
IGPU Model	HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge)	—
Unlocked	No	No
AVX-512	No	No
Virtualization	VT-x	None
Target Use	Budget	Budget

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Celeron G465 was priced at $70, while the Pentium T4400 came in at $107. On launch pricing ($70 vs $107), Celeron G465 was $37 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Celeron G465 delivers 16.9 pts/$ vs 11.0 pts/$ for the Pentium T4400 — making the Celeron G465 the 42.6% better value option.

Feature	Celeron G465	Pentium T4400
MSRP	$70-35%	$107
Performance per Dollar	16.9+54%	11.0
Release Date	2012	2009

Search Celeron G465 on Amazon

Search Pentium T4400 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.