Celeron G4900T vs Pentium G3440

Intel

Celeron G4900T

2 Cores2 Thrd35 WWMax: 2.9 GHz2018
VS
Intel

Pentium G3440

2 Cores2 Thrd54 WWMax: 3.3 GHz2014

Celeron G4900T vs Pentium G3440 Performance Spectrum

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Celeron G4900T vs Pentium G3440 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Celeron G4900T vs Pentium G3440: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Celeron G4900T

2018

Why buy it

  • βœ…+1.7% higher PassMark.
  • βœ…Draws 35W instead of 54W, a 19W reduction.
  • βœ…100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
  • βœ…Integrated graphics onboard with UHD Graphics 610, while Pentium G3440 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

  • ❌Smaller total L3 cache (2 MB vs 3 MB).
  • ❌Launch MSRP is still $42 MSRP, while Pentium G3440 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

Pentium G3440

2014

Why buy it

  • βœ…+50% larger total L3 cache (3 MB vs 2 MB).

Trade-offs

  • ❌Lower PassMark (2,202 vs 2,239).
  • ❌54.3% higher power demand at 54W vs 35W.
  • ❌No integrated graphics, while Celeron G4900T can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Celeron G4900T better than Pentium G3440?
It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Pentium G3440 is ahead with a 1.9% average FPS lead across 36 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Celeron G4900T pulls ahead with 1.7% better PassMark. Pentium G3440 also has the bigger cache pool with 50% larger total L3 cache (3 MB vs 2 MB).
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Celeron G4900T is the stronger fit. You are getting 1.7% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Celeron G4900T is the better buy right now. Celeron G4900T comes in at an unclear MSRP at $42 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you 1.7% better PassMark. The compromise is that Pentium G3440 is still the better pure gaming CPU with a 1.9% average FPS lead across 36 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (53.3 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Celeron G4900T makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2018 vs 2014) and more multi-core headroom with 2 cores / 2 threads instead of 2/2. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Celeron G4900T vs Pentium G3440 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Intel

Celeron G4900T

The Celeron G4900T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 April 2018 (7 years ago). It is based on the Coffee Lake (2017βˆ’2019) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 2.9 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2400. Passmark benchmark score: 2,239 points. Launch price was $42.

Intel

Pentium G3440

The Pentium G3440 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 May 2014 (11 years ago). It is based on the Haswell (2013βˆ’2015) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 3.3 GHz, with boost up to 3.3 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1150. Thermal design power (TDP): 53 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,202 points. Launch price was $95.

⚑

Processing Power

Both the Celeron G4900T and Pentium G3440 share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2.9 GHz on the Celeron G4900T versus 3.3 GHz on the Pentium G3440 β€” a 12.9% clock advantage for the Pentium G3440 (base: 2.9 GHz vs 3.3 GHz). The Celeron G4900T uses the Coffee Lake (2017βˆ’2019) architecture (14 nm), while the Pentium G3440 uses Haswell (2013βˆ’2015) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron G4900T scores 2,239 against the Pentium G3440's 2,202 β€” a 1.7% lead for the Celeron G4900T. L3 cache: 2 MB (total) on the Celeron G4900T vs 3 MB (total) on the Pentium G3440.

FeatureCeleron G4900TPentium G3440
Cores / Threads
2 / 2
2 / 2
Boost Clock
2.9 GHz
3.3 GHz+14%
Base Clock
2.9 GHz
3.3 GHz+14%
L3 Cache
2 MB (total)
3 MB (total)+50%
L2 Cache
256K (per core)
256 kB (per core)
Process
14 nm-36%
22 nm
Architecture
Coffee Lake (2017βˆ’2019)
Haswell (2013βˆ’2015)
PassMark
2,239+2%
2,202
Geekbench 6 Single
623
β€”
Geekbench 6 Multi
1,040
β€”
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron G4900T uses the LGA1151 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Pentium G3440 uses LGA1150 (PCIe 3.0) β€” making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureCeleron G4900TPentium G3440
Socket
LGA1151
LGA1150
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0
PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR4-2400
β€”
Max RAM Capacity
64 GB
β€”
RAM Channels
2
β€”
ECC Support
Yes
β€”
PCIe Lanes
16
β€”
πŸ”§

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x (Celeron G4900T) / not specified (Pentium G3440). The Celeron G4900T includes integrated graphics (UHD Graphics 610), while the Pentium G3440 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron G4900T targets Budget. Direct competitor: Celeron G4900T rivals Pentium G5400T.

FeatureCeleron G4900TPentium G3440
Integrated GPU
Yes
β€”
IGPU Model
UHD Graphics 610
β€”
Unlocked
No
β€”
AVX-512
No
β€”
Virtualization
VT-x
β€”
Target Use
Budget
β€”