
Celeron G4900T

Pro A8-8600B
Celeron G4900T vs Pro A8-8600B Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Celeron G4900T vs Pro A8-8600B FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Call of Duty: Warzone

Civilization VI
Celeron G4900T vs Pro A8-8600B: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Celeron G4900T
2018Why buy it
- ✅+1.6% higher PassMark.
- ✅Costs $108 less on MSRP ($42 MSRP vs $150 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 263.0% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 53.3 vs 14.7 PassMark/$ ($42 MSRP vs $150 MSRP).
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with UHD Graphics 610, while Pro A8-8600B needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌1650% higher power demand at 35W vs 2W.
Pro A8-8600B
2015Why buy it
- ✅Draws 2W instead of 35W, a 33W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (2,203 vs 2,239).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 14.7 vs 53.3 PassMark/$ ($150 MSRP vs $42 MSRP).
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Celeron G4900T can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is Celeron G4900T better than Pro A8-8600B?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Celeron G4900T vs Pro A8-8600B Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Celeron G4900T
The Celeron G4900T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 April 2018 (7 years ago). It is based on the Coffee Lake (2017−2019) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 2.9 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2400. Passmark benchmark score: 2,239 points. Launch price was $42.

Pro A8-8600B
The Pro A8-8600B is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 3 June 2015 (10 years ago). It is based on the Carrizo (2015−2018) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.6 GHz, with boost up to 3 GHz. L2 cache: 2048 kB. Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: FP4. Thermal design power (TDP): 2 MB. Memory support: DDR3/DDR3L-2133. Passmark benchmark score: 2,203 points. Launch price was $69.
Processing Power
The Celeron G4900T packs 2 cores / 2 threads, while the Pro A8-8600B offers 4 cores / 4 threads — the Pro A8-8600B has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2.9 GHz on the Celeron G4900T versus 3 GHz on the Pro A8-8600B — a 3.4% clock advantage for the Pro A8-8600B (base: 2.9 GHz vs 1.6 GHz). The Celeron G4900T uses the Coffee Lake (2017−2019) architecture (14 nm), while the Pro A8-8600B uses Carrizo (2015−2018) (28 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron G4900T scores 2,239 against the Pro A8-8600B's 2,203 — a 1.6% lead for the Celeron G4900T.
| Feature | Celeron G4900T | Pro A8-8600B |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 2 / 2 | 4 / 4+100% |
| Boost Clock | 2.9 GHz | 3 GHz+3% |
| Base Clock | 2.9 GHz+81% | 1.6 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 2 MB (total) | — |
| L2 Cache | 256K (per core) | 2048 kB+700% |
| Process | 14 nm-50% | 28 nm |
| Architecture | Coffee Lake (2017−2019) | Carrizo (2015−2018) |
| PassMark | 2,239+2% | 2,203 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 623 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 1,040 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Celeron G4900T uses the LGA1151 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Pro A8-8600B uses FP4 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Celeron G4900T | Pro A8-8600B |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1151 | FP4 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-2400 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 64 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | Yes | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: VT-x (Celeron G4900T) / not specified (Pro A8-8600B). The Celeron G4900T includes integrated graphics (UHD Graphics 610), while the Pro A8-8600B requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron G4900T targets Budget. Direct competitor: Celeron G4900T rivals Pentium G5400T.
| Feature | Celeron G4900T | Pro A8-8600B |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | — |
| IGPU Model | UHD Graphics 610 | — |
| Unlocked | No | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | VT-x | — |
| Target Use | Budget | — |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Celeron G4900T was priced at $42, while the Pro A8-8600B came in at $150. On launch pricing ($42 vs $150), Celeron G4900T was $108 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Celeron G4900T delivers 53.3 pts/$ vs 14.7 pts/$ for the Pro A8-8600B — making the Celeron G4900T the 113.6% better value option.
| Feature | Celeron G4900T | Pro A8-8600B |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $42-72% | $150 |
| Performance per Dollar | 53.3+263% | 14.7 |
| Release Date | 2018 | 2015 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
















