PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Celeron G6900E vs Core i5-13400F FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Celeron G6900E vs Core i5-13400F: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Celeron G6900E

2022

Why buy it

✅Costs $143 less on MSRP ($53 MSRP vs $196 MSRP).
✅Draws 46W instead of 65W, a 19W reduction.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with UHD Graphics 710, while Core i5-13400F needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-13400F across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower Geekbench multi-core (2,631 vs 11,408).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (4 MB vs 20 MB).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 80.6 vs 127.7 PassMark/$ ($53 MSRP vs $196 MSRP).
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-13400F.

Core i5-13400F

2023

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +157.4% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+400% larger total L3 cache (20 MB vs 4 MB).
✅Delivers 58.4% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 127.7 vs 80.6 PassMark/$ ($196 MSRP vs $53 MSRP).
✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Celeron G6900E.

Trade-offs

❌
269.8% HIGHER MSRP
$196 MSRPvs$53 MSRP
❌41.3% higher power demand at 65W vs 46W.
❌No integrated graphics, while Celeron G6900E can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i5-13400F better than Celeron G6900E?

Yes. Core i5-13400F is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 157.4% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 333.6% better Geekbench multi-core, 485.9% higher PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Core i5-13400F is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 157.4% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i5-13400F is the stronger fit. You are getting 333.6% better Geekbench multi-core, backed by 10 cores and 16 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 400% larger total L3 cache (20 MB vs 4 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i5-13400F is the better buy right now. Core i5-13400F comes in 269.8% more expensive on MSRP at $196 MSRP versus $53 MSRP, and it still gives you a 157.4% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 58.4% better value on MSRP (127.7 vs 80.6 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i5-13400F makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2023 vs 2022), 400% larger total L3 cache (20 MB vs 4 MB), and more multi-core headroom with 10 cores / 16 threads instead of 2/2. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Celeron G6900E vs Core i5-13400F Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Celeron G6900E

The Celeron G6900E is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Alder Lake-S (2022) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 3 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 46 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 4,272 points. Launch price was $69.

Core i5-13400F

The Core i5-13400F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture. It features 10 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 20 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5, DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 25,029 points. Launch price was $196.

⚡

Processing Power

The Celeron G6900E packs 2 cores / 2 threads, while the Core i5-13400F offers 10 cores / 16 threads — the Core i5-13400F has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3 GHz on the Celeron G6900E versus 4.6 GHz on the Core i5-13400F — a 42.1% clock advantage for the Core i5-13400F (base: 3 GHz vs 2.5 GHz). The Celeron G6900E uses the Alder Lake-S (2022) architecture (10 nm), while the Core i5-13400F uses Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) (Intel 7 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron G6900E scores 4,272 against the Core i5-13400F's 25,029 — a 141.7% lead for the Core i5-13400F. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 1,563 vs 2,407, a 42.5% lead for the Core i5-13400F that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 2,631 vs 11,408 (125% advantage for the Core i5-13400F). L3 cache: 4 MB (total) on the Celeron G6900E vs 20 MB (total) on the Core i5-13400F.

Feature	Celeron G6900E	Core i5-13400F
Cores / Threads	2 / 2	10 / 16+400%
Boost Clock	3 GHz	4.6 GHz+53%
Base Clock	3 GHz+20%	2.5 GHz
L3 Cache	4 MB (total)	20 MB (total)+400%
L2 Cache	1.25 MB (per core)	1.25 MB (per core)
Process	10 nm	Intel 7 nm-30%
Architecture	Alder Lake-S (2022)	Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024)
PassMark	4,272	25,029+486%
Cinebench R23 Multi	—	16,211
Geekbench 6 Single	1,563	2,407+54%
Geekbench 6 Multi	2,631	11,408+334%

🧠

Memory & Platform

Both processors use the LGA1700 socket with PCIe 5.0. Both support up to DDR5-4800 memory speed. The Core i5-13400F supports up to 192 GB of RAM compared to 128 GB — 50% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 20 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: H610,B660,H670,Z690,B760,H770,Z790 (Celeron G6900E) and H610,B660,H670,Z690,B760,H770,Z790 (Core i5-13400F).

Feature	Celeron G6900E	Core i5-13400F
Socket	LGA1700	LGA1700
PCIe Generation	PCIe 5.0	PCIe 5.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR5-4800	DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200
Max RAM Capacity	128 GB	192 GB+50%
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	No	No
PCIe Lanes	20	20

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: VT-x (Celeron G6900E) vs VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-13400F). The Celeron G6900E includes integrated graphics (UHD Graphics 710), while the Core i5-13400F requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron G6900E targets Budget, Core i5-13400F targets Gaming. Direct competitor: Celeron G6900E rivals Pentium Gold G7400; Core i5-13400F rivals Ryzen 5 7600.

Feature	Celeron G6900E	Core i5-13400F
Integrated GPU	Yes	No
IGPU Model	UHD Graphics 710	—
Unlocked	No	No
AVX-512	No	No
Virtualization	VT-x	VT-x, VT-d
Target Use	Budget	Gaming

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Celeron G6900E was priced at $53, while the Core i5-13400F came in at $196. On launch pricing ($53 vs $196), Celeron G6900E was $143 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Celeron G6900E delivers 80.6 pts/$ vs 127.7 pts/$ for the Core i5-13400F — making the Core i5-13400F the 45.2% better value option.

Feature	Celeron G6900E	Core i5-13400F
MSRP	$53-73%	$196
Performance per Dollar	80.6	127.7+58%
Release Date	2022	2023

Search Celeron G6900E on Amazon

Search Core i5-13400F on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.