Celeron J1850 vs V-Series V105

Celeron J1850 vs V-Series V105 Performance Spectrum

Celeron J1850

4 / 4

1,035

+0.7%

1,028

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Celeron J1850 vs V-Series V105 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Celeron J1850 vs V-Series V105: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Celeron J1850

2013

Why buy it

✅Draws 2W instead of 512W, a 510W reduction.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (4 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with HD Graphics (Bay Trail), while V-Series V105 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Launch MSRP is still $82 MSRP, while V-Series V105 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

V-Series V105

2010

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (1,028 vs 1,035).
❌25500% higher power demand at 512W vs 2W.
❌No integrated graphics, while Celeron J1850 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Celeron J1850 better than V-Series V105?

Yes. Celeron J1850 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 1.7% average FPS lead across 43 shared CPU game tests in our data, 0.7% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Celeron J1850 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 1.7% more average FPS across 43 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Celeron J1850 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.7% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Celeron J1850 is the better buy right now. Celeron J1850 comes in at an unclear MSRP at $82 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 1.7% average FPS lead across 43 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (12.6 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Celeron J1850 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2013 vs 2010) and more multi-core headroom with 4 cores / 4 threads instead of 1/1. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Celeron J1850 vs V-Series V105 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Celeron J1850

The Celeron J1850 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 September 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Bay Trail-D (2013) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 2 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB L2 Cache. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1170. Thermal design power (TDP): 10 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,035 points. Launch price was $82.

V-Series V105

The V-Series V105 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 12 May 2010 (15 years ago). It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 1.2 GHz. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: S1. Thermal design power (TDP): 512 kB. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,028 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Processing Power

The Celeron J1850 packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the V-Series V105 offers 1 cores / 1 threads — the Celeron J1850 has 3 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2 GHz on the Celeron J1850 versus 1.2 GHz on the V-Series V105 — a 50% clock advantage for the Celeron J1850. The Celeron J1850 is built on the Bay Trail-D (2013) architecture. In PassMark, the Celeron J1850 scores 1,035 against the V-Series V105's 1,028 — a 0.7% lead for the Celeron J1850.

Feature	Celeron J1850	V-Series V105
Cores / Threads	4 / 4+300%	1 / 1
Boost Clock	2 GHz+67%	1.2 GHz
Base Clock	2 GHz	—
L3 Cache	2 MB L2 Cache	—
L2 Cache	2 MB+300%	512 kB
Process	22 nm-51%	45 nm
Architecture	Bay Trail-D (2013)	—
PassMark	1,035	1,028
Geekbench 6 Single	180	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	450	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron J1850 uses the FCBGA1170 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the V-Series V105 uses S1 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Celeron J1850	V-Series V105
Socket	FCBGA1170	S1
PCIe Generation	PCIe 2.0	PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR3L-1333	—
Max RAM Capacity	8 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	4	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x (Celeron J1850) / not specified (V-Series V105). The Celeron J1850 includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics (Bay Trail)), while the V-Series V105 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron J1850 targets Low Power. Direct competitor: Celeron J1850 rivals Pentium J2900.