
Celeron J3455E

Core i5-12400F
Celeron J3455E vs Core i5-12400F Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Celeron J3455E vs Core i5-12400F FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Celeron J3455E vs Core i5-12400F: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Celeron J3455E
2019Why buy it
- ✅+29.4% higher Geekbench multi-core.
- ✅Draws 10W instead of 65W, a 55W reduction.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with HD Graphics 500, while Core i5-12400F needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-12400F across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (2 MB vs 18 MB).
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-12400F.
Core i5-12400F
2022Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +302.3% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+800% larger total L3 cache (18 MB vs 2 MB).
- ✅233.3% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 6) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Celeron J3455E.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower Geekbench multi-core (657 vs 850).
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $174 MSRP, while Celeron J3455E mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌550% higher power demand at 65W vs 10W.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Celeron J3455E can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is Core i5-12400F better than Celeron J3455E?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Celeron J3455E vs Core i5-12400F Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Celeron J3455E
The Celeron J3455E is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.5 GHz, with boost up to 2.3 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Thermal design power (TDP): 10 Watt. Memory support: DDR3L/LPDDR3 up to 1866 MT/s; LPDDR4 up to 2400 MT/s. Passmark benchmark score: 2,193 points. Launch price was $69.

Core i5-12400F
The Core i5-12400F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Alder Lake-S (2022) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 18 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 19,532 points. Launch price was $180.
Processing Power
The Celeron J3455E packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Core i5-12400F offers 6 cores / 12 threads — the Core i5-12400F has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2.3 GHz on the Celeron J3455E versus 4.4 GHz on the Core i5-12400F — a 62.7% clock advantage for the Core i5-12400F (base: 1.5 GHz vs 2.5 GHz). The Core i5-12400F is built on the Alder Lake-S (2022) architecture. In PassMark, the Celeron J3455E scores 2,193 against the Core i5-12400F's 19,532 — a 159.6% lead for the Core i5-12400F. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 450 vs 1,700, a 116.3% lead for the Core i5-12400F that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 850 vs 657 (25.6% advantage for the Celeron J3455E). L3 cache: 2 MB on the Celeron J3455E vs 18 MB (total) on the Core i5-12400F.
| Feature | Celeron J3455E | Core i5-12400F |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 4 | 6 / 12+50% |
| Boost Clock | 2.3 GHz | 4.4 GHz+91% |
| Base Clock | 1.5 GHz | 2.5 GHz+67% |
| L3 Cache | 2 MB | 18 MB (total)+800% |
| L2 Cache | — | 1.25 MB (per core) |
| Process | 14 nm | Intel 7 nm-50% |
| Architecture | — | Alder Lake-S (2022) |
| PassMark | 2,193 | 19,532+791% |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | — | 12,380 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 450 | 1,700+278% |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 850+29% | 657 |
Memory & Platform
Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-2400 on the Celeron J3455E versus DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200 on the Core i5-12400F — the Core i5-12400F supports 100% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Core i5-12400F supports up to 128 GB of RAM compared to 8 GB — 1500% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 6 (Celeron J3455E) vs 20 (Core i5-12400F) — the Core i5-12400F offers 14 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: N/A (SoC) (Celeron J3455E) and H610,B660,H670,Z690,B760,H770,Z790 (Core i5-12400F).
| Feature | Celeron J3455E | Core i5-12400F |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | — | LGA1700 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-2400 | DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200+100% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 8 GB | 128 GB+1500% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | No | No |
| PCIe Lanes | 6 | 20+233% |
Advanced Features
Virtualization support: VT-x (Celeron J3455E) vs VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i5-12400F). The Celeron J3455E includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics 500), while the Core i5-12400F requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron J3455E targets Low Power, Core i5-12400F targets Gaming Performance/Value. Direct competitor: Celeron J3455E rivals Pentium J4205; Core i5-12400F rivals Ryzen 5 5600.
| Feature | Celeron J3455E | Core i5-12400F |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | No |
| IGPU Model | HD Graphics 500 | — |
| Unlocked | No | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | VT-x | VT-x, VT-d, EPT |
| Target Use | Low Power | Gaming Performance/Value |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.













