Celeron J3455E vs Core i5-13400F

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Celeron J3455E vs Core i5-13400F FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Celeron J3455E vs Core i5-13400F: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Celeron J3455E

2019

Why buy it

✅Draws 10W instead of 65W, a 55W reduction.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with HD Graphics 500, while Core i5-13400F needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-13400F across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower Geekbench multi-core (850 vs 11,408).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (2 MB vs 20 MB).
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-13400F.

Core i5-13400F

2023

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +306.3% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+900% larger total L3 cache (20 MB vs 2 MB).
✅233.3% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 6) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Celeron J3455E.

Trade-offs

❌Launch MSRP is still $196 MSRP, while Celeron J3455E mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌550% higher power demand at 65W vs 10W.
❌No integrated graphics, while Celeron J3455E can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i5-13400F better than Celeron J3455E?

Yes. Core i5-13400F is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 306.3% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 1242.1% better Geekbench multi-core, 1041.3% higher PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Core i5-13400F is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 306.3% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i5-13400F is the stronger fit. You are getting 1242.1% better Geekbench multi-core, backed by 10 cores and 16 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 900% larger total L3 cache (20 MB vs 2 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i5-13400F is the better buy right now. Core i5-13400F comes in at an unclear MSRP at $196 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 306.3% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (127.7 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i5-13400F makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2023 vs 2019), a healthier platform with LGA1700 and DDR5 instead of the older platform, 900% larger total L3 cache (20 MB vs 2 MB), and more multi-core headroom with 10 cores / 16 threads instead of 4/4. That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

Celeron J3455E vs Core i5-13400F Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Celeron J3455E

The Celeron J3455E is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.5 GHz, with boost up to 2.3 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Thermal design power (TDP): 10 Watt. Memory support: DDR3L/LPDDR3 up to 1866 MT/s; LPDDR4 up to 2400 MT/s. Passmark benchmark score: 2,193 points. Launch price was $69.

Core i5-13400F

The Core i5-13400F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture. It features 10 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 20 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5, DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 25,029 points. Launch price was $196.

⚡

Processing Power

The Celeron J3455E packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Core i5-13400F offers 10 cores / 16 threads — the Core i5-13400F has 6 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2.3 GHz on the Celeron J3455E versus 4.6 GHz on the Core i5-13400F — a 66.7% clock advantage for the Core i5-13400F (base: 1.5 GHz vs 2.5 GHz). The Core i5-13400F is built on the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture. In PassMark, the Celeron J3455E scores 2,193 against the Core i5-13400F's 25,029 — a 167.8% lead for the Core i5-13400F. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 450 vs 2,407, a 137% lead for the Core i5-13400F that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 850 vs 11,408 (172.3% advantage for the Core i5-13400F). L3 cache: 2 MB on the Celeron J3455E vs 20 MB (total) on the Core i5-13400F.

Feature	Celeron J3455E	Core i5-13400F
Cores / Threads	4 / 4	10 / 16+150%
Boost Clock	2.3 GHz	4.6 GHz+100%
Base Clock	1.5 GHz	2.5 GHz+67%
L3 Cache	2 MB	20 MB (total)+900%
L2 Cache	—	1.25 MB (per core)
Process	14 nm	Intel 7 nm-50%
Architecture	—	Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024)
PassMark	2,193	25,029+1041%
Cinebench R23 Multi	—	16,211
Geekbench 6 Single	450	2,407+435%
Geekbench 6 Multi	850	11,408+1242%

🧠

Memory & Platform

Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-2400 on the Celeron J3455E versus DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200 on the Core i5-13400F — the Core i5-13400F supports 100% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Core i5-13400F supports up to 192 GB of RAM compared to 8 GB — 2300% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 6 (Celeron J3455E) vs 20 (Core i5-13400F) — the Core i5-13400F offers 14 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: N/A (SoC) (Celeron J3455E) and H610,B660,H670,Z690,B760,H770,Z790 (Core i5-13400F).

Feature	Celeron J3455E	Core i5-13400F
Socket	—	LGA1700
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 5.0+67%
Max RAM Speed	DDR4-2400	DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200+100%
Max RAM Capacity	8 GB	192 GB+2300%
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	No	No
PCIe Lanes	6	20+233%

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: VT-x (Celeron J3455E) vs VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-13400F). The Celeron J3455E includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics 500), while the Core i5-13400F requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron J3455E targets Low Power, Core i5-13400F targets Gaming. Direct competitor: Celeron J3455E rivals Pentium J4205; Core i5-13400F rivals Ryzen 5 7600.