
Celeron N3350

Ryzen 9 5900X
Celeron N3350 vs Ryzen 9 5900X Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Celeron N3350 vs Ryzen 9 5900X FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Celeron N3350 vs Ryzen 9 5900X: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Celeron N3350
2016Why buy it
- β Costs $442 less on MSRP ($107 MSRP vs $549 MSRP).
- β Draws 6W instead of 105W, a 99W reduction.
- β Integrated graphics onboard with Intel HD Graphics 500, while Ryzen 9 5900X needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- βWorse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 9 5900X across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- βLower Geekbench multi-core (450 vs 11,888).
- βLower PassMark per dollar, at 10.4 vs 71.0 PassMark/$ ($107 MSRP vs $549 MSRP).
Ryzen 9 5900X
2020Why buy it
- β Better for gaming: +897.0% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- β Delivers 582.8% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 71.0 vs 10.4 PassMark/$ ($549 MSRP vs $107 MSRP).
- β 300% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 6) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- β413.1% HIGHER MSRP$549 MSRPvs$107 MSRP
- β1650% higher power demand at 105W vs 6W.
- βNo integrated graphics, while Celeron N3350 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 9 5900X better than Celeron N3350?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Celeron N3350 vs Ryzen 9 5900X Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Celeron N3350
The Celeron N3350 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 30 August 2016 (9 years ago). It is based on the Apollo Lake (2014β2016) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.1 GHz, with boost up to 2.4 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1296. Thermal design power (TDP): 6 Watt. Memory support: DDR3, DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 1,112 points. Launch price was $24.


Ryzen 9 5900X
The Ryzen 9 5900X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 5 November 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Vermeer (Zen3) (2020β2022) architecture. It features 12 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 3.7 GHz, with boost up to 4.8 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 105 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 38,955 points. Launch price was $549.
Processing Power
The Celeron N3350 packs 2 cores / 2 threads, while the Ryzen 9 5900X offers 12 cores / 24 threads β the Ryzen 9 5900X has 10 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2.4 GHz on the Celeron N3350 versus 4.8 GHz on the Ryzen 9 5900X β a 66.7% clock advantage for the Ryzen 9 5900X (base: 1.1 GHz vs 3.7 GHz). The Celeron N3350 uses the Apollo Lake (2014β2016) architecture (14 nm), while the Ryzen 9 5900X uses Vermeer (Zen3) (2020β2022) (7 nm, 12 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron N3350 scores 1,112 against the Ryzen 9 5900X's 38,955 β a 188.9% lead for the Ryzen 9 5900X. Geekbench 6 single-core β the metric most relevant to gaming β records 250 vs 2,174, a 158.7% lead for the Ryzen 9 5900X that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 450 vs 11,888 (185.4% advantage for the Ryzen 9 5900X). L3 cache: 0 kB on the Celeron N3350 vs 64 MB on the Ryzen 9 5900X.
| Feature | Celeron N3350 | Ryzen 9 5900X |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 2 / 2 | 12 / 24+500% |
| Boost Clock | 2.4 GHz | 4.8 GHz+100% |
| Base Clock | 1.1 GHz | 3.7 GHz+236% |
| L3 Cache | 0 kB | 64 MB |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 512K (per core)+51100% |
| Process | 14 nm | 7 nm, 12 nm-50% |
| Architecture | Apollo Lake (2014β2016) | Vermeer (Zen3) (2020β2022) |
| PassMark | 1,112 | 38,955+3403% |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | β | 21,000 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 250 | 2,174+770% |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 450 | 11,888+2542% |
Memory & Platform
The Celeron N3350 uses the FCBGA1296 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Ryzen 9 5900X uses AM4 (PCIe 4.0) β making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches LPDDR4-2400 on the Celeron N3350 versus DDR4-3200 on the Ryzen 9 5900X β the Ryzen 9 5900X supports 33.3% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Ryzen 9 5900X supports up to 128 GB of RAM compared to 8 GB β 1500% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 6 (Celeron N3350) vs 24 (Ryzen 9 5900X) β the Ryzen 9 5900X offers 18 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: SoC (Celeron N3350) and A320,B350,X370,B450,X470,B550,X570 (Ryzen 9 5900X).
| Feature | Celeron N3350 | Ryzen 9 5900X |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FCBGA1296 | AM4 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 4.0+33% |
| Max RAM Speed | LPDDR4-2400 | DDR4-3200+33% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 8 GB | 128 GB+1500% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | No | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 6 | 24+300% |
Advanced Features
Only the Ryzen 9 5900X has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking β a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Celeron N3350) vs AMD-V (Ryzen 9 5900X). The Celeron N3350 includes integrated graphics (Intel HD Graphics 500), while the Ryzen 9 5900X requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron N3350 targets Entry Level Laptop/NUC, Ryzen 9 5900X targets Workstation. Direct competitor: Celeron N3350 rivals AMD A4-9120; Ryzen 9 5900X rivals Core i9-12900K.
| Feature | Celeron N3350 | Ryzen 9 5900X |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | No |
| IGPU Model | Intel HD Graphics 500 | β |
| Unlocked | No | Yes |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d, EPT | AMD-V |
| Target Use | Entry Level Laptop/NUC | Workstation |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Celeron N3350 was priced at $107, while the Ryzen 9 5900X came in at $549. On launch pricing ($107 vs $549), Celeron N3350 was $442 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Celeron N3350 delivers 10.4 pts/$ vs 71.0 pts/$ for the Ryzen 9 5900X β making the Ryzen 9 5900X the 148.9% better value option.
| Feature | Celeron N3350 | Ryzen 9 5900X |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $107-81% | $549 |
| Performance per Dollar | 10.4 | 71.0+583% |
| Release Date | 2016 | 2020 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.














