CPU
GPU
CMP 40HX
Popular choices:
GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The CMP 40HX is positioned at rank #119 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Balanced cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar CMP 40HX
Performance Per Dollar GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 35.9% higher G3D Mark score and 100% more VRAM (8 GB vs 4 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the CMP 40HX.
| Insight | CMP 40HX | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-35.9%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+35.9%) |
| Longevity | Turing (2018−2022) (12nm) | 🏆Elite Architecture (Ampere (2020−2025) / 8nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | ✨ DLSS 3/4 + Frame Gen Support |
| VRAM | 🎮 High Capacity (4 GB) | 🎮 High Capacity (8 GB) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Although it costs $150 (vs $120), its significant performance lead justifies the premium, offering 8.7% better value per dollar than the CMP 40HX.
| Insight | CMP 40HX | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+8.7%) |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($120) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($150) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
Valorant
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of CMP 40HX and GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
CMP 40HX
The CMP 40HX is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 25 2021. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1470 MHz to 1650 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 185W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. It features 36 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 8,749 points. Launch price was $699.
GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 4 2022. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1515 MHz to 1755 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 130W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 20 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 11,892 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the CMP 40HX scores 8,749 versus the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM's 11,892 — the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM leads by 35.9%. The CMP 40HX is built on Turing while the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM uses Ampere, both on 12 nm vs 8 nm. Shader units: 2,304 (CMP 40HX) vs 2,560 (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM). Raw compute: 7.603 TFLOPS (CMP 40HX) vs 8.986 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM). Boost clocks: 1650 MHz vs 1755 MHz. Ray tracing: 36 RT cores (CMP 40HX) vs 20 (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) with 288 Tensor cores vs 80.
| Feature | CMP 40HX | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 8,749 | 11,892+36% |
| Architecture | Turing | Ampere |
| Process Node | 12 nm | 8 nm |
| Shading Units | 2304 | 2560+11% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 7.603 TFLOPS | 8.986 TFLOPS+18% |
| Boost Clock | 1650 MHz | 1755 MHz+6% |
| ROPs | 64+100% | 32 |
| TMUs | 144+80% | 80 |
| L1 Cache | 2.3 MB | 2.5 MB+9% |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+100% | 2 MB |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 36+80% | 20 |
| Tensor Cores | 288+260% | 80 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | CMP 40HX | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | DLSS 2.0 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR 3 / AFMF (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The CMP 40HX comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM has 8 GB. The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 4 MB (CMP 40HX) vs 2 MB (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) — the CMP 40HX has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | CMP 40HX | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 8 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+100% | 2 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (CMP 40HX) vs 12.2 (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 0 vs 4.
| Feature | CMP 40HX | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12.2+2% |
| Vulkan | 1.2 | 1.3+8% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 0 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: No (CMP 40HX) vs 8th Gen NVENC (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM). Decoder: No vs 5th Gen NVDEC.
| Feature | CMP 40HX | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | No | 8th Gen NVENC |
| Decoder | No | 5th Gen NVDEC |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) |
Power & Dimensions
The CMP 40HX draws 185W versus the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM's 130W — a 34.9% difference. The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (CMP 40HX) vs 450W (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 8-pin. Card length: 229mm vs 235mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 75°C.
| Feature | CMP 40HX | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 185W | 130W-30% |
| Recommended PSU | 500W | 450W-10% |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 8-pin |
| Length | 229mm | 235mm |
| Height | 111mm | 124mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C | 75°C-6% |
| Perf/Watt | 47.3 | 91.5+93% |
Value Analysis
The CMP 40HX launched at $699 MSRP and currently averages $120, while the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM launched at $249 and now averages $150. The CMP 40HX costs 20% less ($30 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 72.9 (CMP 40HX) vs 79.3 (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) — the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM offers 8.8% better value. The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is the newer GPU (2022 vs 2021).
| Feature | CMP 40HX | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $699 | $249-64% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $120-20% | $150 |
| Performance per Dollar | 72.9 | 79.3+9% |
| Codename | TU106 | GA106 |
| Release | February 25 2021 | January 4 2022 |
| Ranking | #302 | #224 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on CMP 40HX and GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
