CMP 40HX vs GeForce RTX 3050 6GB

CMP 40HX

2021Core: 1470 MHzBoost: 1650 MHz
Similar parts
····
VS
NVIDIA

GeForce RTX 3050 6GB

2024Core: 1042 MHzBoost: 1470 MHz
RTX family
·······

CMP 40HX vs GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

CMP 40HX vs GeForce RTX 3050 6GB: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

CMP 40HX

2021

Why buy it

  • Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.

Trade-offs

  • Lower PassMark G3D performance (8,749 vs 10,749).
  • Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 6 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
  • GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is the safer long-term pick here because the hardware is newer and the feature stack is stronger.
  • 313.6% HIGHER MSRP
    $699 MSRPvs$169 MSRP

GeForce RTX 3050 6GB

2024

Why buy it

  • +22.9% higher PassMark G3D performance.
  • Costs $530 less on MSRP ($169 MSRP vs $699 MSRP).
  • Delivers 408.2% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 63.6 vs 12.5 G3D/$ ($169 MSRP vs $699 MSRP).
  • Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
  • 50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (6 GB vs 4 GB).

Trade-offs

  • Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 22.9% in PassMark G3D (10,749 vs 8,749), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 6 GB vs 4 GB of VRAM, the newer upscaling stack, DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack, a 8nm process instead of 12nm, and a newer 2024 generation instead of 2021. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB makes the most sense to buy today. It is $530 cheaper on MSRP at $169 vs $699, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 408.2% (63.6 vs 12.5), so the value case lines up with the gaming result.

CMP 40HX vs GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

CMP 40HX

The CMP 40HX is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 25 2021. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1470 MHz to 1650 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 185W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. It features 36 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 8,749 points. Launch price was $699.

NVIDIA

GeForce RTX 3050 6GB

The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 2 2024. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1042 MHz to 1470 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 70W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 18 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,749 points. Launch price was $179.

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the CMP 40HX scores 8,749 versus the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB's 10,749 — the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB leads by 22.9%. The CMP 40HX is built on Turing while the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB uses Ampere, both on 12 nm vs 8 nm. Shader units: 2,304 (CMP 40HX) vs 2,304 (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB). Raw compute: 7.603 TFLOPS (CMP 40HX) vs 6.774 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB). Boost clocks: 1650 MHz vs 1470 MHz. Ray tracing: 36 RT cores (CMP 40HX) vs 18 (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) with 288 Tensor cores vs 72.

FeatureCMP 40HXGeForce RTX 3050 6GB
G3D Mark Score
8,749
10,749+23%
Architecture
Turing
Ampere
Process Node
12 nm
8 nm
Shading Units
2304
2304
Compute (TFLOPS)
7.603 TFLOPS+12%
6.774 TFLOPS
Boost Clock
1650 MHz+12%
1470 MHz
ROPs
64+100%
32
TMUs
144+100%
72
L1 Cache
2.3 MB
2.3 MB
L2 Cache
4 MB+100%
2 MB
Ray Tracing Cores
36+100%
18
Tensor Cores
288+300%
72

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The CMP 40HX leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

FeatureCMP 40HXGeForce RTX 3050 6GB
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
DLSS 2 Super Resolution
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
NVIDIA Reflex
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The CMP 40HX has 4 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB carries 6 GB. GeForce RTX 3050 6GB gives you 50% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the CMP 40HX and 96-bit on the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB. L2 Cache: 4 MB (CMP 40HX) vs 2 MB (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) — the CMP 40HX has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureCMP 40HXGeForce RTX 3050 6GB
VRAM Capacity
4 GB
6 GB+50%
Memory Type
GDDR6
GDDR6
Bus Width
128-bit+33%
96-bit
L2 Cache
4 MB+100%
2 MB
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (CMP 40HX) vs 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 0 vs 4.

FeatureCMP 40HXGeForce RTX 3050 6GB
DirectX
12 Ultimate
12 Ultimate
Vulkan
1.2
1.3+8%
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Max Displays
0
4
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: No (CMP 40HX) vs NVENC (5th Gen) (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB). Decoder: No vs NVDEC (7th Gen).

FeatureCMP 40HXGeForce RTX 3050 6GB
Encoder
No
NVENC (5th Gen)
Decoder
No
NVDEC (7th Gen)
Codecs
H.264,HEVC,AV1 (Decode Only)
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The CMP 40HX draws 185W versus the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB's 70W — a 90.2% difference. The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (CMP 40HX) vs 300W (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs None. Card length: 229mm vs 160mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 75°C.

FeatureCMP 40HXGeForce RTX 3050 6GB
TDP
185W
70W-62%
Recommended PSU
500W
300W-40%
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
None
Length
229mm
160mm
Height
111mm
Slots
2
2
Temp (Load)
80°C
75°C-6%
Perf/Watt
47.3
153.6+225%
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the CMP 40HX came in at $699, while the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB launched at $169. On MSRP, GeForce RTX 3050 6GB was 75.8% cheaper ($530 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 12.5 (CMP 40HX) vs 63.6 (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) — the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB offers 408.8% better value. The newer card here is GeForce RTX 3050 6GB (2024 vs 2021).

FeatureCMP 40HXGeForce RTX 3050 6GB
MSRP
$699
$169-76%
Performance per Dollar
12.5
63.6+409%
Codename
TU106
GA107
Release
February 25 2021
February 2 2024
Ranking
#302
#252

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.