
CMP 40HX
Popular choices:

Radeon RX590 GME
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
CMP 40HX
2021Why buy it
- ✅More future proof: Turing (2018−2022) on 12nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Measures 229mm instead of 241mm, a 12mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌304% HIGHER MSRP$699 MSRPvs$173 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 12.5 vs 48.3 G3D/$ ($699 MSRP vs $173 MSRP).
Radeon RX590 GME
2018Why buy it
- ✅Costs $526 less on MSRP ($173 MSRP vs $699 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 285.6% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 48.3 vs 12.5 G3D/$ ($173 MSRP vs $699 MSRP).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 8 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
CMP 40HX
2021Radeon RX590 GME
2018Why buy it
- ✅More future proof: Turing (2018−2022) on 12nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Measures 229mm instead of 241mm, a 12mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Why buy it
- ✅Costs $526 less on MSRP ($173 MSRP vs $699 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 285.6% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 48.3 vs 12.5 G3D/$ ($173 MSRP vs $699 MSRP).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌304% HIGHER MSRP$699 MSRPvs$173 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 12.5 vs 48.3 G3D/$ ($699 MSRP vs $173 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 8 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
Quick Answers
So, is CMP 40HX better than Radeon RX590 GME?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Radeon RX590 GME still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | CMP 40HX | Radeon RX590 GME |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 146 FPS | 139 FPS |
| medium | 135 FPS | 124 FPS |
| high | 114 FPS | 108 FPS |
| ultra | 86 FPS | 93 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 129 FPS | 122 FPS |
| medium | 111 FPS | 100 FPS |
| high | 92 FPS | 84 FPS |
| ultra | 72 FPS | 76 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 58 FPS | 71 FPS |
| medium | 51 FPS | 60 FPS |
| high | 41 FPS | 46 FPS |
| ultra | 37 FPS | 40 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | CMP 40HX | Radeon RX590 GME |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 313 FPS | 209 FPS |
| medium | 255 FPS | 179 FPS |
| high | 208 FPS | 145 FPS |
| ultra | 176 FPS | 115 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 212 FPS | 143 FPS |
| medium | 170 FPS | 118 FPS |
| high | 141 FPS | 97 FPS |
| ultra | 115 FPS | 79 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 116 FPS | 81 FPS |
| medium | 95 FPS | 69 FPS |
| high | 78 FPS | 57 FPS |
| ultra | 59 FPS | 45 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | CMP 40HX | Radeon RX590 GME |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 394 FPS | 376 FPS |
| medium | 315 FPS | 301 FPS |
| high | 262 FPS | 250 FPS |
| ultra | 197 FPS | 188 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 295 FPS | 282 FPS |
| medium | 236 FPS | 225 FPS |
| high | 197 FPS | 188 FPS |
| ultra | 148 FPS | 141 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 197 FPS | 188 FPS |
| medium | 157 FPS | 150 FPS |
| high | 131 FPS | 125 FPS |
| ultra | 98 FPS | 94 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | CMP 40HX | Radeon RX590 GME |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 341 FPS | 376 FPS |
| medium | 273 FPS | 301 FPS |
| high | 241 FPS | 250 FPS |
| ultra | 197 FPS | 188 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 263 FPS | 282 FPS |
| medium | 213 FPS | 225 FPS |
| high | 183 FPS | 188 FPS |
| ultra | 148 FPS | 141 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 139 FPS | 176 FPS |
| medium | 111 FPS | 138 FPS |
| high | 102 FPS | 122 FPS |
| ultra | 81 FPS | 94 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of CMP 40HX and Radeon RX590 GME

CMP 40HX
CMP 40HX
The CMP 40HX is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 25 2021. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1470 MHz to 1650 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 185W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. It features 36 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 8,749 points. Launch price was $699.

Radeon RX590 GME
Radeon RX590 GME
The Radeon RX590 GME is manufactured by AMD. It was released in November 15 2018. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1469 MHz to 1545 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 175W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 8,349 points. Launch price was $279.
Graphics Performance
The CMP 40HX scores 8,749 and the Radeon RX590 GME reaches 8,349 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 4.8% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The CMP 40HX is built on Turing while the Radeon RX590 GME uses GCN 4.0, both on a 12 nm process. Shader units: 2,304 (CMP 40HX) vs 2,304 (Radeon RX590 GME). Raw compute: 7.603 TFLOPS (CMP 40HX) vs 7.119 TFLOPS (Radeon RX590 GME). Boost clocks: 1650 MHz vs 1545 MHz.
| Feature | CMP 40HX | Radeon RX590 GME |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 8,749+5% | 8,349 |
| Architecture | Turing | GCN 4.0 |
| Process Node | 12 nm | 12 nm |
| Shading Units | 2304 | 2304 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 7.603 TFLOPS+7% | 7.119 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1650 MHz+7% | 1545 MHz |
| ROPs | 64+100% | 32 |
| TMUs | 144 | 144 |
| L1 Cache | 2.3 MB+311% | 0.56 MB |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+100% | 2 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | CMP 40HX | Radeon RX590 GME |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The CMP 40HX comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon RX590 GME has 8 GB. The Radeon RX590 GME offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 4 MB (CMP 40HX) vs 2 MB (Radeon RX590 GME) — the CMP 40HX has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | CMP 40HX | Radeon RX590 GME |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 8 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+100% | 2 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (CMP 40HX) vs 12.0 (Radeon RX590 GME). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 0 vs 4.
| Feature | CMP 40HX | Radeon RX590 GME |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12.0 |
| Vulkan | 1.2 | 1.3+8% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 0 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: No (CMP 40HX) vs VCE 3.4 (Radeon RX590 GME). Decoder: No vs UVD 6.3.
| Feature | CMP 40HX | Radeon RX590 GME |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | No | VCE 3.4 |
| Decoder | No | UVD 6.3 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC |
Power & Dimensions
The CMP 40HX draws 185W versus the Radeon RX590 GME's 175W — a 5.6% difference. The Radeon RX590 GME is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (CMP 40HX) vs 500W (Radeon RX590 GME). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 8-pin. Card length: 229mm vs 241mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 80°C.
| Feature | CMP 40HX | Radeon RX590 GME |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 185W | 175W-5% |
| Recommended PSU | 500W | 500W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 8-pin |
| Length | 229mm | 241mm |
| Height | 111mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 47.3 | 47.7 |
Value Analysis
The CMP 40HX launched at $699 MSRP, while the Radeon RX590 GME launched at $173. The Radeon RX590 GME costs 75.3% less ($526 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 12.5 (CMP 40HX) vs 48.3 (Radeon RX590 GME) — the Radeon RX590 GME offers 286.4% better value. The CMP 40HX is the newer GPU (2021 vs 2018).
| Feature | CMP 40HX | Radeon RX590 GME |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $699 | $173-75% |
| Performance per Dollar | 12.5 | 48.3+286% |
| Codename | TU106 | Polaris 30 |
| Release | February 25 2021 | November 15 2018 |
| Ranking | #302 | #285 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













