Core 2 Duo SU7300
Ryzen 5 3600
Core 2 Duo SU7300 vs Ryzen 5 3600 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Core 2 Duo SU7300 vs Ryzen 5 3600 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
Valorant
Among Us
Apex Legends
ARC Raiders
Baldur's Gate 3
Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Core 2 Duo SU7300 vs Ryzen 5 3600: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Core 2 Duo SU7300
2009Why buy it
- ✅Draws 3W instead of 65W, a 62W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 5 3600 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower Geekbench multi-core (338 vs 1,898).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (3 MB vs 32 MB).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 5.2 vs 88.9 PassMark/$ ($289 MSRP vs $199 MSRP).
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Ryzen 5 3600.
Ryzen 5 3600
2019Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +473.9% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+966.7% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 3 MB).
- ✅Costs $90 less on MSRP ($199 MSRP vs $289 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 1616.8% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 88.9 vs 5.2 PassMark/$ ($199 MSRP vs $289 MSRP).
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌2066.7% higher power demand at 65W vs 3W.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 5 3600 better than Core 2 Duo SU7300?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core 2 Duo SU7300 vs Ryzen 5 3600 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
Core 2 Duo SU7300
The Core 2 Duo SU7300 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2008-01-01. It is based on the Penryn (2008−2011) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.3 GHz, with boost up to 1.3 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB Intel® Smart Cache. L2 cache: 3 MB. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: BGA956. Thermal design power (TDP): 10 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 1,496 points. Launch price was $249.
Ryzen 5 3600
The Ryzen 5 3600 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 7 July 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Matisse (2019−2020) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.2 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 17,685 points. Launch price was $199.
Processing Power
The Core 2 Duo SU7300 packs 2 cores / 2 threads, while the Ryzen 5 3600 offers 6 cores / 12 threads — the Ryzen 5 3600 has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 1.3 GHz on the Core 2 Duo SU7300 versus 4.2 GHz on the Ryzen 5 3600 — a 105.5% clock advantage for the Ryzen 5 3600 (base: 1.3 GHz vs 3.6 GHz). The Core 2 Duo SU7300 uses the Penryn (2008−2011) architecture (45 nm), while the Ryzen 5 3600 uses Matisse (2019−2020) (7 nm, 12 nm). In PassMark, the Core 2 Duo SU7300 scores 1,496 against the Ryzen 5 3600's 17,685 — a 168.8% lead for the Ryzen 5 3600. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 188 vs 1,295, a 149.3% lead for the Ryzen 5 3600 that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 338 vs 1,898 (139.5% advantage for the Ryzen 5 3600). L3 cache: 3 MB Intel® Smart Cache on the Core 2 Duo SU7300 vs 32 MB (total) on the Ryzen 5 3600.
| Feature | Core 2 Duo SU7300 | Ryzen 5 3600 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 2 / 2 | 6 / 12+200% |
| Boost Clock | 1.3 GHz | 4.2 GHz+223% |
| Base Clock | 1.3 GHz | 3.6 GHz+177% |
| L3 Cache | 3 MB Intel® Smart Cache | 32 MB (total)+967% |
| L2 Cache | 3 MB | 512K (per core)+16967% |
| Process | 45 nm | 7 nm, 12 nm-84% |
| Architecture | Penryn (2008−2011) | Matisse (2019−2020) |
| PassMark | 1,496 | 17,685+1082% |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | — | 9,500 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 188 | 1,295+589% |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 338 | 1,898+462% |
Memory & Platform
The Core 2 Duo SU7300 uses the BGA956 socket (PCIe 1.1), while the Ryzen 5 3600 uses AM4 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3-1066 on the Core 2 Duo SU7300 versus DDR4-3200 on the Ryzen 5 3600 — the Ryzen 5 3600 supports 200.2% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Ryzen 5 3600 supports up to 128 GB of RAM compared to 8 GB — 1500% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 0 (Core 2 Duo SU7300) vs 24 (Ryzen 5 3600) — the Ryzen 5 3600 offers 24 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: GS45,GM45 (Core 2 Duo SU7300) and AMD B550,AMD X570,AMD B450,AMD X470 (Ryzen 5 3600).
| Feature | Core 2 Duo SU7300 | Ryzen 5 3600 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | BGA956 | AM4 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 1.1 | PCIe 4.0+264% |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR3-1066 | DDR4-3200+200% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 8 GB | 128 GB+1500% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | No | No |
| PCIe Lanes | 0 | 24 |
Advanced Features
Only the Ryzen 5 3600 has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Virtualization support: VT-x (Core 2 Duo SU7300) vs Yes (Ryzen 5 3600). Primary use case: Core 2 Duo SU7300 targets Ultra-Low Voltage Laptop, Ryzen 5 3600 targets Gaming/Budget Workstation. Direct competitor: Ryzen 5 3600 rivals Core i5-10400.
| Feature | Core 2 Duo SU7300 | Ryzen 5 3600 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| Unlocked | No | Yes |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | VT-x | Yes |
| Target Use | Ultra-Low Voltage Laptop | Gaming/Budget Workstation |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Core 2 Duo SU7300 was priced at $289, while the Ryzen 5 3600 came in at $199. On launch pricing ($289 vs $199), Ryzen 5 3600 was $90 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core 2 Duo SU7300 delivers 5.2 pts/$ vs 88.9 pts/$ for the Ryzen 5 3600 — making the Ryzen 5 3600 the 178% better value option.
| Feature | Core 2 Duo SU7300 | Ryzen 5 3600 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $289 | $199-31% |
| Performance per Dollar | 5.2 | 88.9+1610% |
| Release Date | 2009 | 2019 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Core 2 Duo SU7300 and Ryzen 5 3600
