
Core 7 160UL
Popular choices:

Core i7-13700K
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core 7 160UL
2024Why buy it
- ✅Draws 15W instead of 125W, a 110W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-13700K across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (11,043 vs 45,784).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (12 MB vs 30 MB).
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core i7-13700K can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Core i7-13700K
2022Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +96.5% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+150% larger total L3 cache (30 MB vs 12 MB).
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel UHD Graphics 770, while Core 7 160UL needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $409 MSRP, while Core 7 160UL mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌733.3% higher power demand at 125W vs 15W.
Core 7 160UL
2024Core i7-13700K
2022Why buy it
- ✅Draws 15W instead of 125W, a 110W reduction.
Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +96.5% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+150% larger total L3 cache (30 MB vs 12 MB).
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel UHD Graphics 770, while Core 7 160UL needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-13700K across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (11,043 vs 45,784).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (12 MB vs 30 MB).
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core i7-13700K can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $409 MSRP, while Core 7 160UL mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌733.3% higher power demand at 125W vs 15W.
Quick Answers
So, is Core i7-13700K better than Core 7 160UL?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core 7 160UL | Core i7-13700K |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 262 FPS | 284 FPS |
| medium | 234 FPS | 268 FPS |
| high | 200 FPS | 223 FPS |
| ultra | 171 FPS | 190 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 224 FPS | 238 FPS |
| medium | 180 FPS | 200 FPS |
| high | 149 FPS | 159 FPS |
| ultra | 131 FPS | 139 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 157 FPS | 159 FPS |
| medium | 127 FPS | 134 FPS |
| high | 98 FPS | 103 FPS |
| ultra | 85 FPS | 90 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core 7 160UL | Core i7-13700K |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 228 FPS | 689 FPS |
| medium | 193 FPS | 580 FPS |
| high | 175 FPS | 484 FPS |
| ultra | 154 FPS | 439 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 204 FPS | 595 FPS |
| medium | 179 FPS | 525 FPS |
| high | 162 FPS | 441 FPS |
| ultra | 137 FPS | 378 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 152 FPS | 348 FPS |
| medium | 140 FPS | 314 FPS |
| high | 133 FPS | 295 FPS |
| ultra | 114 FPS | 261 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core 7 160UL | Core i7-13700K |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 276 FPS | 648 FPS |
| medium | 276 FPS | 530 FPS |
| high | 276 FPS | 467 FPS |
| ultra | 276 FPS | 405 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 276 FPS | 591 FPS |
| medium | 276 FPS | 491 FPS |
| high | 276 FPS | 427 FPS |
| ultra | 276 FPS | 371 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 276 FPS | 434 FPS |
| medium | 276 FPS | 374 FPS |
| high | 276 FPS | 339 FPS |
| ultra | 276 FPS | 290 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core 7 160UL | Core i7-13700K |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 276 FPS | 970 FPS |
| medium | 276 FPS | 883 FPS |
| high | 276 FPS | 766 FPS |
| ultra | 276 FPS | 689 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 276 FPS | 829 FPS |
| medium | 276 FPS | 740 FPS |
| high | 276 FPS | 642 FPS |
| ultra | 276 FPS | 566 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 276 FPS | 567 FPS |
| medium | 276 FPS | 515 FPS |
| high | 276 FPS | 463 FPS |
| ultra | 276 FPS | 404 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core 7 160UL and Core i7-13700K

Core 7 160UL
Core 7 160UL
The Core 7 160UL is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 8 April 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-PS (2024) architecture. It features 10 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 1.8 GHz, with boost up to 5.2 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 11,043 points. Launch price was $149.

Core i7-13700K
Core i7-13700K
The Core i7-13700K is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 27 September 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022) architecture. It features 16 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 3.4 GHz, with boost up to 5.4 GHz. L3 cache: 30 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 125 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 45,784 points. Launch price was $409.
Processing Power
The Core 7 160UL packs 10 cores / 12 threads, while the Core i7-13700K offers 16 cores / 24 threads — the Core i7-13700K has 6 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.2 GHz on the Core 7 160UL versus 5.4 GHz on the Core i7-13700K — a 3.8% clock advantage for the Core i7-13700K (base: 1.8 GHz vs 3.4 GHz). The Core 7 160UL uses the Raptor Lake-PS (2024) architecture (10 nm), while the Core i7-13700K uses Raptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022) (Intel 7 nm). In PassMark, the Core 7 160UL scores 11,043 against the Core i7-13700K's 45,784 — a 122.3% lead for the Core i7-13700K. L3 cache: 12 MB (total) on the Core 7 160UL vs 30 MB (total) on the Core i7-13700K.
| Feature | Core 7 160UL | Core i7-13700K |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 10 / 12 | 16 / 24+60% |
| Boost Clock | 5.2 GHz | 5.4 GHz+4% |
| Base Clock | 1.8 GHz | 3.4 GHz+89% |
| L3 Cache | 12 MB (total) | 30 MB (total)+150% |
| L2 Cache | 1.25 MB (per core) | 2 MB (per core)+60% |
| Process | 10 nm | Intel 7 nm-30% |
| Architecture | Raptor Lake-PS (2024) | Raptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022) |
| PassMark | 11,043 | 45,784+315% |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | — | 31,000 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 2,846 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 18,980 |
Memory & Platform
Both processors use the LGA1700 socket with PCIe 5.0.
| Feature | Core 7 160UL | Core i7-13700K |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1700 | LGA1700 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0 | PCIe 5.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | — | DDR5-5600 |
| Max RAM Capacity | — | 192 GB |
| RAM Channels | — | 2 |
| ECC Support | — | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | — | 20 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: not specified (Core 7 160UL) / true (Core i7-13700K). The Core i7-13700K includes integrated graphics (Intel UHD Graphics 770), while the Core 7 160UL requires a dedicated GPU. Direct competitor: Core i7-13700K rivals Ryzen 9 7900X.
| Feature | Core 7 160UL | Core i7-13700K |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | — | Yes |
| IGPU Model | — | Intel UHD Graphics 770 |
| Unlocked | — | Yes |
| AVX-512 | — | No |
| Virtualization | — | true |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.













