Core Duo T2250 vs Core i3-2340UE

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core Duo T2250 vs Core i3-2340UE FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core Duo T2250 vs Core i3-2340UE: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core Duo T2250

2006

Why buy it

✅Draws 2W instead of 17W, a 15W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (1,537 vs 1,545).
❌No integrated graphics, while Core i3-2340UE can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Core i3-2340UE

2011

Why buy it

✅+0.5% higher PassMark.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with HD Graphics 3000, while Core Duo T2250 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Launch MSRP is still $200 MSRP, while Core Duo T2250 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌750% higher power demand at 17W vs 2W.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i3-2340UE better than Core Duo T2250?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Core Duo T2250 is ahead with a 0.9% average FPS lead across 48 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Core i3-2340UE pulls ahead with 0.5% better PassMark.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i3-2340UE is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.5% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i3-2340UE is the better buy right now. Core i3-2340UE comes in at an unclear MSRP at $200 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you 0.5% better PassMark. The compromise is that Core Duo T2250 is still the better pure gaming CPU with a 0.9% average FPS lead across 48 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (7.7 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i3-2340UE makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2011 vs 2006) and more multi-core headroom with 2 cores / 4 threads instead of 2/2. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Core Duo T2250 vs Core i3-2340UE Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core Duo T2250

The Core Duo T2250 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2008-01-01. It is based on the Yonah (2005−2006) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.73 GHz, with boost up to 1.7 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 31 Watt. Memory support: DDR1. Passmark benchmark score: 1,537 points. Launch price was $249.

Core i3-2340UE

The Core i3-2340UE is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 June 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Max frequency: 1.3 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1023. Thermal design power (TDP): 17 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,545 points. Launch price was $250.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core Duo T2250 packs 2 cores / 2 threads, matching the Core i3-2340UE's 2 cores. Boost clocks reach 1.7 GHz on the Core Duo T2250 versus 1.3 GHz on the Core i3-2340UE — a 26.7% clock advantage for the Core Duo T2250. The Core Duo T2250 uses the Yonah (2005−2006) architecture (65 nm), while the Core i3-2340UE uses Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Core Duo T2250 scores 1,537 against the Core i3-2340UE's 1,545 — a 0.5% lead for the Core i3-2340UE. L3 cache: 0 kB on the Core Duo T2250 vs 3 MB (total) on the Core i3-2340UE.

Feature	Core Duo T2250	Core i3-2340UE
Cores / Threads	2 / 2	2 / 4
Boost Clock	1.7 GHz+31%	1.3 GHz
Base Clock	1.73 GHz	—
L3 Cache	0 kB	3 MB (total)
L2 Cache	2 MB	256K (per core)+12700%
Process	65 nm	32 nm-51%
Architecture	Yonah (2005−2006)	Sandy Bridge (2011−2013)
PassMark	1,537	1,545
Geekbench 6 Single	—	230

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core Duo T2250 uses the PGA478 socket (PCIe 1.1), while the Core i3-2340UE uses BGA1023 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Core Duo T2250	Core i3-2340UE
Socket	PGA478	BGA1023
PCIe Generation	PCIe 1.1	PCIe 2.0+82%
Max RAM Speed	—	DDR3-1333
Max RAM Capacity	—	16 GB
RAM Channels	—	2
ECC Support	—	Yes
PCIe Lanes	—	16

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (Core Duo T2250) / VT-x, EPT (Core i3-2340UE). The Core i3-2340UE includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics 3000), while the Core Duo T2250 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i3-2340UE targets Embedded. Direct competitor: Core i3-2340UE rivals Embedded G-Series.