Core Duo T2250 vs Xeon E5335

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core Duo T2250 vs Xeon E5335 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core Duo T2250 vs Xeon E5335: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core Duo T2250

2006

Why buy it

✅Draws 2W instead of 80W, a 78W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (1,537 vs 1,549).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon E5335, which brings 4 cores / 4 threads.

Xeon E5335

2006

Why buy it

✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 4 cores / 4 threads.

Trade-offs

❌3900% higher power demand at 80W vs 2W.

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon E5335 better than Core Duo T2250?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon E5335 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Core Duo T2250 is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Xeon E5335 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 0.8% more average FPS across 49 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon E5335 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.8% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon E5335 still makes the most sense overall. Xeon E5335 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 0.8% average FPS lead across 49 shared CPU game tests in our data.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Xeon E5335 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting more multi-core headroom with 4 cores / 4 threads instead of 2/2. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Core Duo T2250 vs Xeon E5335 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core Duo T2250

The Core Duo T2250 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2008-01-01. It is based on the Yonah (2005−2006) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.73 GHz, with boost up to 1.7 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 31 Watt. Memory support: DDR1. Passmark benchmark score: 1,537 points. Launch price was $249.

Xeon E5335

The Xeon E5335 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Clovertown (2006−2007) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 2 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB L2 Cache. L2 cache: 4 MB (total). Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: LGA771. Thermal design power (TDP): 80 Watt. Memory support: DDR2, DDR3 Depends on motherboard. Passmark benchmark score: 1,549 points. Launch price was $800.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core Duo T2250 packs 2 cores / 2 threads, while the Xeon E5335 offers 4 cores / 4 threads — the Xeon E5335 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 1.7 GHz on the Core Duo T2250 versus 2 GHz on the Xeon E5335 — a 16.2% clock advantage for the Xeon E5335 (base: 1.73 GHz vs 2 GHz). The Core Duo T2250 uses the Yonah (2005−2006) architecture (65 nm), while the Xeon E5335 uses Clovertown (2006−2007) (65 nm). In PassMark, the Core Duo T2250 scores 1,537 against the Xeon E5335's 1,549 — a 0.8% lead for the Xeon E5335. L3 cache: 0 kB on the Core Duo T2250 vs 8 MB L2 Cache on the Xeon E5335.

Feature	Core Duo T2250	Xeon E5335
Cores / Threads	2 / 2	4 / 4+100%
Boost Clock	1.7 GHz	2 GHz+18%
Base Clock	1.73 GHz	2 GHz+16%
L3 Cache	0 kB	8 MB L2 Cache
L2 Cache	2 MB	4 MB (total)+100%
Process	65 nm	65 nm
Architecture	Yonah (2005−2006)	Clovertown (2006−2007)
PassMark	1,537	1,549

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core Duo T2250 uses the PGA478 socket (PCIe 1.1), while the Xeon E5335 uses LGA771 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.