Core Duo T2250
VS
Core i7-640LM

Core Duo T2250 vs Core i7-640LM

Intel

Core Duo T2250

2 Cores2 Thrd2 WWMax: 1.7 GHz2006
VS
Intel

Core i7-640LM

2 Cores4 Thrd25 WWMax: 2.93 GHz2010

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Core Duo T2250 is positioned at rank 3 and the Core i7-640LM is on rank 333, so the Core Duo T2250 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Core Duo T2250

#3
Core Duo T2250
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#4
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
95%
#5
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
94%
#6
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
86%
#7
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
86%
#8
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
85%
#10
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
82%
#11
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
79%
#12
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
79%
#13
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
77%
#17
Core i3-350M
MSRP: $130|Avg: $10
71%
#18
Atom x5-E8000
MSRP: $18|Avg: N/A
70%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Core i7-640LM

#321
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
480%
#322
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
473%
#323
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
434%
#324
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
432%
#325
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
428%
#327
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
413%
#328
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
396%
#329
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
396%
#330
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
385%
#333
Core i7-640LM
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#336
Xeon E3-1505M v5
MSRP: $115|Avg: $115
99%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Trade-off: The Core i7-640LM leads in gaming performance. However, the Core Duo T2250 is the stronger candidate for professional workloads, offering 0.5% greater multi-core processing power.
InsightCore Duo T2250Core i7-640LM
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Better multi-core power
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Yonah (2005−2006) / 65 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Arrandale (2010−2011) / 32 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

InsightCore Duo T2250Core i7-640LM
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core Duo T2250 and Core i7-640LM

Intel

Core Duo T2250

The Core Duo T2250 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2008-01-01. It is based on the Yonah (2005−2006) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.73 GHz, with boost up to 1.7 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 31 Watt. Memory support: DDR1. Passmark benchmark score: 1,537 points. Launch price was $249.

Intel

Core i7-640LM

The Core i7-640LM is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 7 January 2010 (15 years ago). It is based on the Arrandale (2010−2011) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.13 GHz, with boost up to 2.93 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1288. Thermal design power (TDP): 25 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-800, DDR3-1066. Passmark benchmark score: 1,529 points. Launch price was $332.

Processing Power

The Core Duo T2250 packs 2 cores / 2 threads, matching the Core i7-640LM's 2 cores. Boost clocks reach 1.7 GHz on the Core Duo T2250 versus 2.93 GHz on the Core i7-640LM — a 53.1% clock advantage for the Core i7-640LM (base: 1.73 GHz vs 2.13 GHz). The Core Duo T2250 uses the Yonah (2005−2006) architecture (65 nm), while the Core i7-640LM uses Arrandale (2010−2011) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Core Duo T2250 scores 1,537 against the Core i7-640LM's 1,529 — a 0.5% lead for the Core Duo T2250. L3 cache: 0 kB on the Core Duo T2250 vs 4 MB (total) on the Core i7-640LM.

FeatureCore Duo T2250Core i7-640LM
Cores / Threads
2 / 2
2 / 4
Boost Clock
1.7 GHz
2.93 GHz+72%
Base Clock
1.73 GHz
2.13 GHz+23%
L3 Cache
0 kB
4 MB (total)
L2 Cache
2 MB+700%
256 kB (per core)
Process
65 nm
32 nm-51%
Architecture
Yonah (2005−2006)
Arrandale (2010−2011)
PassMark
1,537
1,529
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core Duo T2250 uses the PGA478 socket (PCIe 1.1), while the Core i7-640LM uses BGA1288 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureCore Duo T2250Core i7-640LM
Socket
PGA478
BGA1288
PCIe Generation
PCIe 1.1
PCIe 2.0+82%
Max RAM Speed
1066
Max RAM Capacity
8
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
16
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (Core Duo T2250) / true (Core i7-640LM). The Core i7-640LM includes integrated graphics (Intel HD Graphics (Ironlake)), while the Core Duo T2250 requires a dedicated GPU. Direct competitor: Core i7-640LM rivals Core 2 Duo SL9400.

FeatureCore Duo T2250Core i7-640LM
Integrated GPU
Yes
IGPU Model
Intel HD Graphics (Ironlake)
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
true