Core i3-1115G4E vs Pentium Gold 7505

Intel

Core i3-1115G4E

2 Cores4 Thrd15 WWMax: 3.9 GHz2020
Similar parts
·······
VS
Intel

Pentium Gold 7505

2 Cores4 Thrd2.5 WWMax: 3.5 GHz2020
Similar parts
·······

Core i3-1115G4E vs Pentium Gold 7505 Performance Spectrum

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i3-1115G4E vs Pentium Gold 7505 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i3-1115G4E vs Pentium Gold 7505: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i3-1115G4E

2020

Why buy it

  • +50% larger total L3 cache (6 MB vs 4 MB).
  • 100+% more PCIe lanes (4 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
  • Integrated graphics onboard with UHD Graphics for 11th Gen (48 EU), while Pentium Gold 7505 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

  • Launch MSRP is still $213 MSRP, while Pentium Gold 7505 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
  • 500% higher power demand at 15W vs 2.5W.

Pentium Gold 7505

2020

Why buy it

  • Draws 3W instead of 15W, a 13W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Lower PassMark (5,174 vs 5,231).
  • Smaller total L3 cache (4 MB vs 6 MB).
  • No integrated graphics, while Core i3-1115G4E can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i3-1115G4E better than Pentium Gold 7505?
Yes. Core i3-1115G4E is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 2.9% average FPS lead across 15 shared CPU game tests in our data, 1.1% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.
Which one is better for gaming?
If gaming is the priority, Core i3-1115G4E is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 2.9% more average FPS across 15 shared CPU game tests.
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i3-1115G4E is the stronger fit. You are getting 1.1% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 4 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 50% larger total L3 cache (6 MB vs 4 MB).
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Core i3-1115G4E is the better buy right now. Core i3-1115G4E comes in at an unclear MSRP at $213 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 2.9% average FPS lead across 15 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (24.6 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core i3-1115G4E makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting 50% larger total L3 cache (6 MB vs 4 MB) and more multi-core headroom with 2 cores / 4 threads instead of 2/4. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Core i3-1115G4E vs Pentium Gold 7505 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Intel

Core i3-1115G4E

The Core i3-1115G4E is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2 September 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Tiger Lake-U (2020−2021) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.9 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1449. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, LPDDR4X. Passmark benchmark score: 5,231 points. Launch price was $285.

Intel

Pentium Gold 7505

The Pentium Gold 7505 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Tiger Lake-U (2020−2021) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 3.5 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB. L2 cache: 2.5 MB. Built on 10 nm SuperFin process technology. Socket: FCBGA1449. Thermal design power (TDP): 2.5 MB + 4 MB. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 5,174 points. Launch price was $69.

Processing Power

Both the Core i3-1115G4E and Pentium Gold 7505 share an identical 2-core/4-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 3.9 GHz on the Core i3-1115G4E versus 3.5 GHz on the Pentium Gold 7505 — a 10.8% clock advantage for the Core i3-1115G4E (base: 2.2 GHz vs 2 GHz). Both are built on the Tiger Lake-U (2020−2021) architecture using a 10 nm process. In PassMark, the Core i3-1115G4E scores 5,231 against the Pentium Gold 7505's 5,174 — a 1.1% lead for the Core i3-1115G4E. L3 cache: 6 MB (total) on the Core i3-1115G4E vs 4 MB on the Pentium Gold 7505.

FeatureCore i3-1115G4EPentium Gold 7505
Cores / Threads
2 / 4
2 / 4
Boost Clock
3.9 GHz+11%
3.5 GHz
Base Clock
2.2 GHz+10%
2 GHz
L3 Cache
6 MB (total)+50%
4 MB
L2 Cache
1.25 MB (per core)
2.5 MB+100%
Process
10 nm
10 nm SuperFin
Architecture
Tiger Lake-U (2020−2021)
Tiger Lake-U (2020−2021)
PassMark
5,231+1%
5,174
Geekbench 6 Single
1,506
🧠

Memory & Platform

Both processors use the FCBGA1449 socket with PCIe 4.0.

FeatureCore i3-1115G4EPentium Gold 7505
Socket
FCBGA1449
FCBGA1449
PCIe Generation
PCIe 4.0
PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR4-3200
Max RAM Capacity
64 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
No
PCIe Lanes
4
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i3-1115G4E) / not specified (Pentium Gold 7505). The Core i3-1115G4E includes integrated graphics (UHD Graphics for 11th Gen (48 EU)), while the Pentium Gold 7505 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i3-1115G4E targets Embedded. Direct competitor: Core i3-1115G4E rivals Ryzen Embedded V2516.

FeatureCore i3-1115G4EPentium Gold 7505
Integrated GPU
Yes
IGPU Model
UHD Graphics for 11th Gen (48 EU)
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
Yes
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d, EPT
Target Use
Embedded