Core i3-1115G4E vs Xeon D-1527

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i3-1115G4E vs Xeon D-1527 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i3-1115G4E vs Xeon D-1527: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i3-1115G4E

2020

Why buy it

✅+1.8% higher PassMark.
✅+300% larger total L3 cache (6 MB vs 1.5 MB).
✅Draws 15W instead of 35W, a 20W reduction.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (4 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with UHD Graphics for 11th Gen (48 EU), while Xeon D-1527 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon D-1527 across 34 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon D-1527, which brings 4 cores / 8 threads.
❌Launch MSRP is still $213 MSRP, while Xeon D-1527 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

Xeon D-1527

2015

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +13.4% higher average FPS across 34 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 4 cores / 8 threads.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (5,137 vs 5,231).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (1.5 MB vs 6 MB).
❌133.3% higher power demand at 35W vs 15W.
❌No integrated graphics, while Core i3-1115G4E can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i3-1115G4E better than Xeon D-1527?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon D-1527 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Core i3-1115G4E is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i3-1115G4E is the stronger fit. You are getting 1.8% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 4 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 300% larger total L3 cache (6 MB vs 1.5 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i3-1115G4E is the better buy right now. Core i3-1115G4E comes in at an unclear MSRP at $213 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you 1.8% better PassMark. The compromise is that Xeon D-1527 is still the better pure gaming CPU with a 13.4% average FPS lead across 34 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (24.6 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i3-1115G4E makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2020 vs 2015), 300% larger total L3 cache (6 MB vs 1.5 MB), more multi-core headroom with 2 cores / 4 threads instead of 4/8, and AVX-512 support for heavier modern compute workloads. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Core i3-1115G4E vs Xeon D-1527 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i3-1115G4E

The Core i3-1115G4E is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2 September 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Tiger Lake-U (2020−2021) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.9 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1449. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, LPDDR4X. Passmark benchmark score: 5,231 points. Launch price was $285.

Xeon D-1527

The Xeon D-1527 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 November 2015 (10 years ago). It is based on the Broadwell (2015−2019) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 2.7 GHz. L3 cache: 1.5 MB (per core). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1667. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 5,137 points. Launch price was $213.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i3-1115G4E packs 2 cores / 4 threads, while the Xeon D-1527 offers 4 cores / 8 threads — the Xeon D-1527 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.9 GHz on the Core i3-1115G4E versus 2.7 GHz on the Xeon D-1527 — a 36.4% clock advantage for the Core i3-1115G4E (base: 2.2 GHz vs 2.2 GHz). The Core i3-1115G4E uses the Tiger Lake-U (2020−2021) architecture (10 nm), while the Xeon D-1527 uses Broadwell (2015−2019) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core i3-1115G4E scores 5,231 against the Xeon D-1527's 5,137 — a 1.8% lead for the Core i3-1115G4E. L3 cache: 6 MB (total) on the Core i3-1115G4E vs 1.5 MB (per core) on the Xeon D-1527.

Feature	Core i3-1115G4E	Xeon D-1527
Cores / Threads	2 / 4	4 / 8+100%
Boost Clock	3.9 GHz+44%	2.7 GHz
Base Clock	2.2 GHz	2.2 GHz
L3 Cache	6 MB (total)+300%	1.5 MB (per core)
L2 Cache	1.25 MB (per core)	256K (per core)+20380%
Process	10 nm-29%	14 nm
Architecture	Tiger Lake-U (2020−2021)	Broadwell (2015−2019)
PassMark	5,231+2%	5,137
Geekbench 6 Single	1,506	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i3-1115G4E uses the FCBGA1449 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon D-1527 uses FCBGA1667 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Core i3-1115G4E	Xeon D-1527
Socket	FCBGA1449	FCBGA1667
PCIe Generation	PCIe 4.0+33%	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR4-3200	—
Max RAM Capacity	64 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	4	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i3-1115G4E) / not specified (Xeon D-1527). The Core i3-1115G4E includes integrated graphics (UHD Graphics for 11th Gen (48 EU)), while the Xeon D-1527 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i3-1115G4E targets Embedded. Direct competitor: Core i3-1115G4E rivals Ryzen Embedded V2516.