Core i3-380UM vs A4-6210
Core i3-380UM
A4-6210
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Core i3-380UM is positioned at rank 225 and the A4-6210 is on rank 787, so the Core i3-380UM offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Core i3-380UM
Performance Per Dollar A4-6210
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Core i3-380UM | A4-6210 |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ✅ Superior gaming performance | ❌ Lower gaming performance |
| Workstation | ✅ Better multi-core power | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks |
| Price | Equivalent pricing | Equivalent pricing |
| Longevity | 🛑 Legacy (Arrandale (2010−2011) / 32 nm) | 🛑 Legacy (Beema (2014) / 28 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Core i3-380UM | A4-6210 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | Equivalent pricing | Equivalent pricing |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i3-380UM and A4-6210
Core i3-380UM
The Core i3-380UM is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 October 2010 (15 years ago). It is based on the Arrandale (2010−2011) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.33 GHz, with boost up to 0.03 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1288. Thermal design power (TDP): 18 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,502 points. Launch price was $69.
A4-6210
The A4-6210 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Beema (2014) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Max frequency: 1.8 GHz. L2 cache: 2048 kB. Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: FT3. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-1599. Passmark benchmark score: 1,499 points. Launch price was $50.
Processing Power
The Core i3-380UM packs 2 cores / 4 threads, while the A4-6210 offers 4 cores / 4 threads — the A4-6210 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 0.03 GHz on the Core i3-380UM versus 1.8 GHz on the A4-6210 — a 193.4% clock advantage for the A4-6210. The Core i3-380UM uses the Arrandale (2010−2011) architecture (32 nm), while the A4-6210 uses Beema (2014) (28 nm). In PassMark, the Core i3-380UM scores 1,502 against the A4-6210's 1,499 — a 0.2% lead for the Core i3-380UM. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 199 vs 198, a 0.5% lead for the Core i3-380UM that directly translates to higher frame rates.
| Feature | Core i3-380UM | A4-6210 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 2 / 4 | 4 / 4+100% |
| Boost Clock | 0.03 GHz | 1.8 GHz+5900% |
| Base Clock | 1.33 GHz | — |
| L3 Cache | 3 MB | — |
| L2 Cache | 512 kB | 2048 kB+300% |
| Process | 32 nm | 28 nm-13% |
| Architecture | Arrandale (2010−2011) | Beema (2014) |
| PassMark | 1,502 | 1,499 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 199 | 198 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 451 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Core i3-380UM uses the BGA1288 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the A4-6210 uses FT3 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR3-800 memory speed. The A4-6210 supports up to 16 GB of RAM compared to 8 GB — 66.7% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Core i3-380UM) vs 1 (A4-6210). PCIe lanes: 16 (Core i3-380UM) vs 8 (A4-6210) — the Core i3-380UM offers 8 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives.
| Feature | Core i3-380UM | A4-6210 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | BGA1288 | FT3 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 2.0 | PCIe 3.0+50% |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR3-800 | DDR3L-1600 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 8 GB | 16 GB+100% |
| RAM Channels | 2+100% | 1 |
| ECC Support | ❌ | ❌ |
| PCIe Lanes | 16+100% | 8 |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: No (Core i3-380UM) vs AMD-V (A4-6210). Both include integrated graphics — Intel HD Graphics (Core i3-380UM) and Radeon R3 (A4-6210) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i3-380UM targets Budget, A4-6210 targets Entry Laptop. Direct competitor: Core i3-380UM rivals Athlon Silver 3050U; A4-6210 rivals Pentium N3700.
| Feature | Core i3-380UM | A4-6210 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | Yes |
| IGPU Model | Intel HD Graphics | Radeon R3 |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | No | AMD-V |
| Target Use | Budget | Entry Laptop |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Core i3-380UM and A4-6210
