Core i3-380UM vs Pentium G850

Intel

Core i3-380UM

2 Cores4 Thrd512 WWMax: 0.03 GHz2010
Similar parts
·······
VS
Intel

Pentium G850

2 Cores2 Thrd65 WWMax: 2.9 GHz2011
Similar parts
·······

Core i3-380UM vs Pentium G850 Performance Spectrum

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i3-380UM vs Pentium G850 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i3-380UM vs Pentium G850: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i3-380UM

2010

Why buy it

  • +0.7% higher PassMark.
  • 100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
  • Integrated graphics onboard with Intel HD Graphics, while Pentium G850 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

  • 687.7% higher power demand at 512W vs 65W.

Pentium G850

2011

Why buy it

  • Draws 65W instead of 512W, a 447W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Lower PassMark (1,491 vs 1,502).
  • Launch MSRP is still $86 MSRP, while Core i3-380UM mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
  • No integrated graphics, while Core i3-380UM can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Pentium G850 better than Core i3-380UM?
It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Pentium G850 is ahead with a 1.8% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Core i3-380UM pulls ahead with 0.7% better PassMark.
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i3-380UM is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.7% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 4 threads.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Pentium G850 is the better buy right now. Pentium G850 comes in at an unclear MSRP at $86 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 1.8% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. The compromise is that Core i3-380UM is still stronger for heavier multi-core work with 0.7% better PassMark. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (17.3 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Pentium G850 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2011 vs 2010). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Core i3-380UM vs Pentium G850 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Intel

Core i3-380UM

The Core i3-380UM is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 October 2010 (15 years ago). It is based on the Arrandale (2010−2011) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.33 GHz, with boost up to 0.03 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1288. Thermal design power (TDP): 18 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,502 points. Launch price was $69.

Intel

Pentium G850

The Pentium G850 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 22 May 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 2.9 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1155. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,491 points. Launch price was $27.

Processing Power

The Core i3-380UM packs 2 cores / 4 threads, matching the Pentium G850's 2 cores. Boost clocks reach 0.03 GHz on the Core i3-380UM versus 2.9 GHz on the Pentium G850 — a 195.9% clock advantage for the Pentium G850 (base: 1.33 GHz vs 2.9 GHz). The Core i3-380UM uses the Arrandale (2010−2011) architecture (32 nm), while the Pentium G850 uses Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Core i3-380UM scores 1,502 against the Pentium G850's 1,491 — a 0.7% lead for the Core i3-380UM. L3 cache: 3 MB on the Core i3-380UM vs 3 MB (total) on the Pentium G850.

FeatureCore i3-380UMPentium G850
Cores / Threads
2 / 4
2 / 2
Boost Clock
0.03 GHz
2.9 GHz+9567%
Base Clock
1.33 GHz
2.9 GHz+118%
L3 Cache
3 MB
3 MB (total)
L2 Cache
512 kB+100%
256 kB (per core)
Process
32 nm
32 nm
Architecture
Arrandale (2010−2011)
Sandy Bridge (2011−2013)
PassMark
1,502
1,491
Geekbench 6 Single
199
Geekbench 6 Multi
451
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i3-380UM uses the BGA1288 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Pentium G850 uses LGA1155 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureCore i3-380UMPentium G850
Socket
BGA1288
LGA1155
PCIe Generation
PCIe 2.0
PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR3-800
Max RAM Capacity
8 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
No
PCIe Lanes
16
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: No (Core i3-380UM) / not specified (Pentium G850). The Core i3-380UM includes integrated graphics (Intel HD Graphics), while the Pentium G850 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i3-380UM targets Budget. Direct competitor: Core i3-380UM rivals Athlon Silver 3050U.

FeatureCore i3-380UMPentium G850
Integrated GPU
Yes
IGPU Model
Intel HD Graphics
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
No
Target Use
Budget