PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i3-4330TE vs Core i5-10400F FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i3-4330TE vs Core i5-10400F: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i3-4330TE

2014

Why buy it

✅Costs $22 less on MSRP ($138 MSRP vs $160 MSRP).
✅Draws 35W instead of 65W, a 30W reduction.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with HD Graphics 4600, while Core i5-10400F needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-10400F across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (2,022 vs 13,029).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (4 MB vs 12 MB).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 14.7 vs 81.4 PassMark/$ ($138 MSRP vs $160 MSRP).
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-10400F.

Core i5-10400F

2020

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +262.1% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+200% larger total L3 cache (12 MB vs 4 MB).
✅Delivers 455.8% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 81.4 vs 14.7 PassMark/$ ($160 MSRP vs $138 MSRP).
✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Core i3-4330TE.

Trade-offs

❌
15.9% HIGHER MSRP
$160 MSRPvs$138 MSRP
❌85.7% higher power demand at 65W vs 35W.
❌No integrated graphics, while Core i3-4330TE can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i5-10400F better than Core i3-4330TE?

Yes. Core i5-10400F is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 262.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 544.4% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Core i5-10400F is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 262.1% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i5-10400F is the stronger fit. You are getting 544.4% better PassMark, backed by 6 cores and 12 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 200% larger total L3 cache (12 MB vs 4 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i5-10400F is the better buy right now. Core i5-10400F comes in 15.9% more expensive on MSRP at $160 MSRP versus $138 MSRP, and it still gives you a 262.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 455.8% better value on MSRP (81.4 vs 14.7 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i5-10400F makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2020 vs 2014), 200% larger total L3 cache (12 MB vs 4 MB), and more multi-core headroom with 6 cores / 12 threads instead of 2/4. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Core i3-4330TE vs Core i5-10400F Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i3-4330TE

The Core i3-4330TE is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 11 May 2014 (11 years ago). It is based on the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 2.4 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1150. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,022 points. Launch price was $69.

Core i5-10400F

The Core i5-10400F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 30 April 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Comet Lake (2020−2025) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 4.3 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1200. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 13,029 points. Launch price was $155.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i3-4330TE packs 2 cores / 4 threads, while the Core i5-10400F offers 6 cores / 12 threads — the Core i5-10400F has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2.4 GHz on the Core i3-4330TE versus 4.3 GHz on the Core i5-10400F — a 56.7% clock advantage for the Core i5-10400F (base: 2.4 GHz vs 2.9 GHz). The Core i3-4330TE uses the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture (22 nm), while the Core i5-10400F uses Comet Lake (2020−2025) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core i3-4330TE scores 2,022 against the Core i5-10400F's 13,029 — a 146.3% lead for the Core i5-10400F. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 650 vs 1,454, a 76.4% lead for the Core i5-10400F that directly translates to higher frame rates. L3 cache: 4 MB (total) on the Core i3-4330TE vs 12 MB (total) on the Core i5-10400F.

Feature	Core i3-4330TE	Core i5-10400F
Cores / Threads	2 / 4	6 / 12+200%
Boost Clock	2.4 GHz	4.3 GHz+79%
Base Clock	2.4 GHz	2.9 GHz+21%
L3 Cache	4 MB (total)	12 MB (total)+200%
L2 Cache	256 kB (per core)	256K (per core)
Process	22 nm	14 nm-36%
Architecture	Haswell (2013−2015)	Comet Lake (2020−2025)
PassMark	2,022	13,029+544%
Cinebench R23 Multi	—	8,191
Geekbench 6 Single	650	1,454+124%
Geekbench 6 Multi	—	5,783

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i3-4330TE uses the LGA1150 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i5-10400F uses LGA1200 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3-1600 on the Core i3-4330TE versus DDR4-2666 on the Core i5-10400F — the Core i5-10400F supports 66.6% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Core i5-10400F supports up to 128 GB of RAM compared to 32 GB — 300% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 16 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: H81,B85,Q85,H87,Q87,Z87,H97,Z97,C226 (Core i3-4330TE) and H410,B460,H470,Z490,H510,B560,H570,Z590 (Core i5-10400F).

Feature	Core i3-4330TE	Core i5-10400F
Socket	LGA1150	LGA1200
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR3-1600	DDR4-2666+67%
Max RAM Capacity	32 GB	128 GB+300%
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	Yes	No
PCIe Lanes	16	16

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: VT-x, EPT (Core i3-4330TE) vs VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-10400F). The Core i3-4330TE includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics 4600), while the Core i5-10400F requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i3-4330TE targets Embedded, Core i5-10400F targets Gaming. Direct competitor: Core i3-4330TE rivals Embedded R-Series; Core i5-10400F rivals Ryzen 5 3600.

Feature	Core i3-4330TE	Core i5-10400F
Integrated GPU	Yes	No
IGPU Model	HD Graphics 4600	—
Unlocked	No	No
AVX-512	No	No
Virtualization	VT-x, EPT	VT-x, VT-d
Target Use	Embedded	Gaming

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Core i3-4330TE was priced at $138, while the Core i5-10400F came in at $160. On launch pricing ($138 vs $160), Core i3-4330TE was $22 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i3-4330TE delivers 14.7 pts/$ vs 81.4 pts/$ for the Core i5-10400F — making the Core i5-10400F the 139% better value option.

Feature	Core i3-4330TE	Core i5-10400F
MSRP	$138-14%	$160
Performance per Dollar	14.7	81.4+454%
Release Date	2014	2020

Search Core i3-4330TE on Amazon

Search Core i5-10400F on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.