Core i3-N300 vs Core i3-10105
Core i3-N300
Core i3-10105
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. The Core i3-N300 is positioned at rank #761 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Core i3-N300
Performance Per Dollar Core i3-10105
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Core i3-N300 | Core i3-10105 |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ❌ Lower gaming performance | ✅ Superior gaming performance |
| Workstation | ✅ Better multi-core power | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks |
| Price | ⚠️ Higher cost ($309) | ✅ More affordable ($90) |
| Longevity | ✨ Modern (Alder Lake-N (2023) / Intel 7 nm) | ✨ Modern (Comet Lake-R (2021) / 14 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Core i3-N300 | Core i3-10105 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+242%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️ Higher cost ($309) | ✅ More affordable ($90) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i3-N300 and Core i3-10105
Core i3-N300
The Core i3-N300 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Alder Lake-N (2023) architecture. It features 8 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 0.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.8 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per module). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1264. Thermal design power (TDP): 7 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200, DDR5-4800, LPDDR5-4800. Passmark benchmark score: 8,283 points. Launch price was $309.
Core i3-10105
The Core i3-10105 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 16 March 2021 (4 years ago). It is based on the Comet Lake-R (2021) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.7 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1200. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2666. Passmark benchmark score: 8,242 points. Launch price was $122.
Processing Power
The Core i3-N300 packs 8 cores / 8 threads, while the Core i3-10105 offers 4 cores / 8 threads — the Core i3-N300 has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.8 GHz on the Core i3-N300 versus 4.4 GHz on the Core i3-10105 — a 14.6% clock advantage for the Core i3-10105 (base: 0.1 GHz vs 3.7 GHz). The Core i3-N300 uses the Alder Lake-N (2023) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Core i3-10105 uses Comet Lake-R (2021) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core i3-N300 scores 8,283 against the Core i3-10105's 8,242 — a 0.5% lead for the Core i3-N300. Both processors carry 6 MB (total) of L3 cache.
| Feature | Core i3-N300 | Core i3-10105 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 8 / 8+100% | 4 / 8 |
| Boost Clock | 3.8 GHz | 4.4 GHz+16% |
| Base Clock | 0.1 GHz | 3.7 GHz+3600% |
| L3 Cache | 6 MB (total) | 6 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB (per module)+700% | 256 kB (per core) |
| Process | Intel 7 nm-50% | 14 nm |
| Architecture | Alder Lake-N (2023) | Comet Lake-R (2021) |
| PassMark | 8,283 | 8,242 |
Memory & Platform
The Core i3-N300 uses the FCBGA1264 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Core i3-10105 uses LGA1200 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core i3-N300 | Core i3-10105 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FCBGA1264 | LGA1200 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0+67% | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | — | DDR4-2666 |
| Max RAM Capacity | — | 128 GB |
| RAM Channels | — | 2 |
| ECC Support | — | ❌ |
| PCIe Lanes | — | 16 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: not specified (Core i3-N300) / VT-x, VT-d (Core i3-10105). The Core i3-10105 includes integrated graphics (UHD Graphics 630), while the Core i3-N300 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i3-10105 targets Desktop.
| Feature | Core i3-N300 | Core i3-10105 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | — | Yes |
| IGPU Model | — | UHD Graphics 630 |
| Unlocked | — | No |
| AVX-512 | — | No |
| Virtualization | — | VT-x, VT-d |
| Target Use | — | Desktop |
Value Analysis
The Core i3-N300 launched at $309 MSRP, while the Core i3-10105 debuted at $122. At current prices ($309 vs $90), the Core i3-10105 is $219 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i3-N300 delivers 26.8 pts/$ vs 91.6 pts/$ for the Core i3-10105 — making the Core i3-10105 the 109.4% better value option.
| Feature | Core i3-N300 | Core i3-10105 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $309 | $122-61% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $309 | $90-71% |
| Performance per Dollar | 26.8 | 91.6+242% |
| Release Date | 2023 | 2021 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Core i3-N300 and Core i3-10105
