Core i5-13400T vs Ryzen 7 4700G

Intel

Core i5-13400T

10 Cores16 Thrd35 WWMax: 4.4 GHz2023
VS
AMD

Ryzen 7 4700G

8 Cores16 Thrd65 WWMax: 4.4 GHz2020

Core i5-13400T vs Ryzen 7 4700G Performance Spectrum

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i5-13400T vs Ryzen 7 4700G FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i5-13400T vs Ryzen 7 4700G: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i5-13400T

2023

Why buy it

  • βœ…+0.4% higher PassMark.
  • βœ…+150% larger total L3 cache (20 MB vs 8 MB).
  • βœ…Costs $78 less on MSRP ($221 MSRP vs $299 MSRP).
  • βœ…Delivers 35.9% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 91.7 vs 67.5 PassMark/$ ($221 MSRP vs $299 MSRP).
  • βœ…Draws 35W instead of 65W, a 30W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 4700G across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.

Ryzen 7 4700G

2020

Why buy it

  • βœ…Better for gaming: +10.7% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • βœ…20% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

  • ❌Lower PassMark (20,180 vs 20,265).
  • ❌Smaller total L3 cache (8 MB vs 20 MB).
  • ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 67.5 vs 91.7 PassMark/$ ($299 MSRP vs $221 MSRP).
  • ❌85.7% higher power demand at 65W vs 35W.
  • ❌Older platform position on AM4 with DDR4, while Core i5-13400T moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i5-13400T better than Ryzen 7 4700G?
It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Ryzen 7 4700G is ahead with a 10.7% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Core i5-13400T pulls ahead with 0.4% better PassMark. Core i5-13400T also has the bigger cache pool with 150% larger total L3 cache (20 MB vs 8 MB).
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i5-13400T is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.4% better PassMark, backed by 10 cores and 16 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 150% larger total L3 cache (20 MB vs 8 MB).
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Core i5-13400T is the better buy right now. Core i5-13400T comes in $78 cheaper on MSRP at $221 MSRP versus $299 MSRP, and it still gives you 0.4% better PassMark. The compromise is that Ryzen 7 4700G is still the better pure gaming CPU with a 10.7% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 35.9% better value on MSRP (91.7 vs 67.5 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper. That said, if you already own a compatible AM4 + DDR4 setup, Ryzen 7 4700G can still make sense as a platform-matched option because it avoids a motherboard and RAM swap, but on MSRP alone you would want to find it meaningfully cheaper in real-world listings before that path becomes easy to justify.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core i5-13400T makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2023 vs 2020), a healthier platform with LGA1700 and DDR5 instead of AM4, 150% larger total L3 cache (20 MB vs 8 MB), and more multi-core headroom with 10 cores / 16 threads instead of 8/16. That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

Core i5-13400T vs Ryzen 7 4700G Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Intel

Core i5-13400T

The Core i5-13400T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-S (2023βˆ’2024) architecture. It features 10 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 1.3 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 20 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 20,265 points. Launch price was $221.

AMD

Ryzen 7 4700G

The Ryzen 7 4700G is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 21 July 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Renoir (2020βˆ’2023) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 20,180 points. Launch price was $299.

⚑

Processing Power

The Core i5-13400T packs 10 cores / 16 threads, while the Ryzen 7 4700G offers 8 cores / 16 threads β€” the Core i5-13400T has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.4 GHz on the Core i5-13400T versus 4.4 GHz on the Ryzen 7 4700G β€” identical boost frequencies (base: 1.3 GHz vs 3.6 GHz). The Core i5-13400T uses the Raptor Lake-S (2023βˆ’2024) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Ryzen 7 4700G uses Renoir (2020βˆ’2023) (7 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-13400T scores 20,265 against the Ryzen 7 4700G's 20,180 β€” a 0.4% lead for the Core i5-13400T. L3 cache: 20 MB (total) on the Core i5-13400T vs 8 MB on the Ryzen 7 4700G.

FeatureCore i5-13400TRyzen 7 4700G
Cores / Threads
10 / 16+25%
8 / 16
Boost Clock
4.4 GHz
4.4 GHz
Base Clock
1.3 GHz
3.6 GHz+177%
L3 Cache
20 MB (total)+150%
8 MB
L2 Cache
1.25 MB (per core)+150%
512 kB (per core)
Process
Intel 7 nm
7 nm
Architecture
Raptor Lake-S (2023βˆ’2024)
Renoir (2020βˆ’2023)
PassMark
20,265
20,180
Cinebench R23 Multi
16,094
β€”
Geekbench 6 Single
2,364
β€”
Geekbench 6 Multi
11,135
β€”
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i5-13400T uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Ryzen 7 4700G uses AM4 (PCIe 4.0) β€” making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-4800 on the Core i5-13400T versus DDR4-3200 on the Ryzen 7 4700G β€” the Core i5-13400T supports 50% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Core i5-13400T supports up to 192 GB of RAM compared to 128 GB β€” 50% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 20 (Core i5-13400T) vs 24 (Ryzen 7 4700G) β€” the Ryzen 7 4700G offers 4 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives.

FeatureCore i5-13400TRyzen 7 4700G
Socket
LGA1700
AM4
PCIe Generation
PCIe 5.0+25%
PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR5-4800+50%
DDR4-3200
Max RAM Capacity
192 GB+50%
128 GB
RAM Channels
2
2
ECC Support
Yes
No
PCIe Lanes
20
24+20%
πŸ”§

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-13400T) vs AMD-V (Ryzen 7 4700G). Both include integrated graphics β€” Intel UHD Graphics 730 (Core i5-13400T) and Radeon Graphics (8CU) (Ryzen 7 4700G) β€” useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-13400T targets Energy Efficient Desktop, Ryzen 7 4700G targets Desktop. Direct competitor: Core i5-13400T rivals Ryzen 5 7600.

FeatureCore i5-13400TRyzen 7 4700G
Integrated GPU
Yes
Yes
IGPU Model
Intel UHD Graphics 730
Radeon Graphics (8CU)
Unlocked
No
No
AVX-512
No
No
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d
AMD-V
Target Use
Energy Efficient Desktop
Desktop
πŸ’°

Value Analysis

At launch, the Core i5-13400T was priced at $221, while the Ryzen 7 4700G came in at $299. On launch pricing ($221 vs $299), Core i5-13400T was $78 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i5-13400T delivers 91.7 pts/$ vs 67.5 pts/$ for the Ryzen 7 4700G β€” making the Core i5-13400T the 30.4% better value option.

FeatureCore i5-13400TRyzen 7 4700G
MSRP
$221-26%
$299
Performance per Dollar
91.7+36%
67.5
Release Date
2023
2020

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.