Core i7-2670QM vs Xeon L5506

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i7-2670QM vs Xeon L5506 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i7-2670QM vs Xeon L5506: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i7-2670QM

2011

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +15.1% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+50% larger total L3 cache (6 MB vs 4 MB).
✅Draws 45W instead of 60W, a 15W reduction.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel HD Graphics 3000, while Xeon L5506 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.

Xeon L5506

2009

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-2670QM across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (3,706 vs 3,748).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (4 MB vs 6 MB).
❌33.3% higher power demand at 60W vs 45W.
❌No integrated graphics, while Core i7-2670QM can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i7-2670QM better than Xeon L5506?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon L5506 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Core i7-2670QM is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Core i7-2670QM is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 15.1% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i7-2670QM is the stronger fit. You are getting 1.1% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 8 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 50% larger total L3 cache (6 MB vs 4 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i7-2670QM still makes the most sense overall. Core i7-2670QM comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 15.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i7-2670QM makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2011 vs 2009), 50% larger total L3 cache (6 MB vs 4 MB), and more multi-core headroom with 4 cores / 8 threads instead of 4/4. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Core i7-2670QM vs Xeon L5506 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i7-2670QM

The Core i7-2670QM is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 12 October 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.1 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: PGA988. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-1066, DDR3-1333. Passmark benchmark score: 3,748 points. Launch price was $378.

Xeon L5506

The Xeon L5506 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 30 March 2009 (16 years ago). It is based on the Gainestown (2009−2010) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.13 GHz, with boost up to 0.13 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1366. Thermal design power (TDP): 60 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 3,706 points. Launch price was $125.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i7-2670QM packs 4 cores / 8 threads, matching the Xeon L5506's 4 cores. Boost clocks reach 3.1 GHz on the Core i7-2670QM versus 0.13 GHz on the Xeon L5506 — a 183.9% clock advantage for the Core i7-2670QM (base: 2.2 GHz vs 2.13 GHz). The Core i7-2670QM uses the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture (32 nm), while the Xeon L5506 uses Gainestown (2009−2010) (45 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-2670QM scores 3,748 against the Xeon L5506's 3,706 — a 1.1% lead for the Core i7-2670QM. L3 cache: 6 MB (total) on the Core i7-2670QM vs 4 MB (total) on the Xeon L5506.

Feature	Core i7-2670QM	Xeon L5506
Cores / Threads	4 / 8	4 / 4
Boost Clock	3.1 GHz+2285%	0.13 GHz
Base Clock	2.2 GHz+3%	2.13 GHz
L3 Cache	6 MB (total)+50%	4 MB (total)
L2 Cache	256K (per core)	256 kB (per core)
Process	32 nm-29%	45 nm
Architecture	Sandy Bridge (2011−2013)	Gainestown (2009−2010)
PassMark	3,748+1%	3,706

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i7-2670QM uses the PGA988 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Xeon L5506 uses LGA1366 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Core i7-2670QM	Xeon L5506
Socket	PGA988	LGA1366
PCIe Generation	PCIe 2.0	PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed	1600	—
Max RAM Capacity	32	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	16	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: true (Core i7-2670QM) / not specified (Xeon L5506). The Core i7-2670QM includes integrated graphics (Intel HD Graphics 3000), while the Xeon L5506 requires a dedicated GPU. Direct competitor: Core i7-2670QM rivals AMD A8-3510MX.