Core i7-4702MQ vs Ryzen 5 3600

Intel

Core i7-4702MQ

4 Cores8 Thrd37 WWMax: 3.2 GHz2013
Similar parts
·······
VS
AMD

Ryzen 5 3600

6 Cores12 Thrd65 WWMax: 4.2 GHz2019
Ryzen family
·······

Core i7-4702MQ vs Ryzen 5 3600 Performance Spectrum

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i7-4702MQ vs Ryzen 5 3600 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i7-4702MQ vs Ryzen 5 3600: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i7-4702MQ

2013

Why buy it

  • +67.5% higher Geekbench multi-core.
  • Draws 37W instead of 65W, a 28W reduction.
  • Integrated graphics onboard with HD Graphics 4600, while Ryzen 5 3600 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

  • Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 5 3600 across 49 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • Smaller total L3 cache (8 MB vs 32 MB).
  • Lower PassMark per dollar, at 13.5 vs 88.9 PassMark/$ ($383 MSRP vs $199 MSRP).
  • No boxed cooler included, unlike Ryzen 5 3600.

Ryzen 5 3600

2019

Why buy it

  • Better for gaming: +96.3% higher average FPS across 49 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • +300% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 8 MB).
  • Costs $184 less on MSRP ($199 MSRP vs $383 MSRP).
  • Delivers 556.2% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 88.9 vs 13.5 PassMark/$ ($199 MSRP vs $383 MSRP).
  • 50% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 16) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

  • Lower Geekbench multi-core (1,898 vs 3,180).
  • 75.7% higher power demand at 65W vs 37W.
  • No integrated graphics, while Core i7-4702MQ can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Ryzen 5 3600 better than Core i7-4702MQ?
It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Ryzen 5 3600 is ahead with a 96.3% average FPS lead across 49 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Core i7-4702MQ pulls ahead with 67.5% better Geekbench multi-core. Ryzen 5 3600 also has the bigger cache pool with 300% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 8 MB).
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i7-4702MQ is the stronger fit. You are getting 67.5% better Geekbench multi-core, backed by 4 cores and 8 threads.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Ryzen 5 3600 is the better buy right now. Ryzen 5 3600 comes in $184 cheaper on MSRP at $199 MSRP versus $383 MSRP, and it still gives you a 96.3% average FPS lead across 49 shared CPU game tests in our data. The compromise is that Core i7-4702MQ is still stronger for heavier multi-core work with 67.5% better Geekbench multi-core. It is also 556.2% better value on MSRP (88.9 vs 13.5 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Ryzen 5 3600 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2019 vs 2013) and 300% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 8 MB). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Core i7-4702MQ vs Ryzen 5 3600 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Intel

Core i7-4702MQ

The Core i7-4702MQ is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 27 May 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: PGA946. Thermal design power (TDP): 37 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 5,187 points. Launch price was $378.

AMD

Ryzen 5 3600

The Ryzen 5 3600 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 7 July 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Matisse (2019−2020) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.2 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 17,685 points. Launch price was $199.

Processing Power

The Core i7-4702MQ packs 4 cores / 8 threads, while the Ryzen 5 3600 offers 6 cores / 12 threads — the Ryzen 5 3600 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.2 GHz on the Core i7-4702MQ versus 4.2 GHz on the Ryzen 5 3600 — a 27% clock advantage for the Ryzen 5 3600 (base: 2.2 GHz vs 3.6 GHz). The Core i7-4702MQ uses the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture (22 nm), while the Ryzen 5 3600 uses Matisse (2019−2020) (7 nm, 12 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-4702MQ scores 5,187 against the Ryzen 5 3600's 17,685 — a 109.3% lead for the Ryzen 5 3600. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 965 vs 1,295, a 29.2% lead for the Ryzen 5 3600 that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 3,180 vs 1,898 (50.5% advantage for the Core i7-4702MQ). L3 cache: 8 MB (total) on the Core i7-4702MQ vs 32 MB (total) on the Ryzen 5 3600.

FeatureCore i7-4702MQRyzen 5 3600
Cores / Threads
4 / 8
6 / 12+50%
Boost Clock
3.2 GHz
4.2 GHz+31%
Base Clock
2.2 GHz
3.6 GHz+64%
L3 Cache
8 MB (total)
32 MB (total)+300%
L2 Cache
256K (per core)
512K (per core)+100%
Process
22 nm
7 nm, 12 nm-68%
Architecture
Haswell (2013−2015)
Matisse (2019−2020)
PassMark
5,187
17,685+241%
Cinebench R23 Multi
9,500
Geekbench 6 Single
965
1,295+34%
Geekbench 6 Multi
3,180+68%
1,898
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i7-4702MQ uses the PGA946 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Ryzen 5 3600 uses AM4 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3L-1600 on the Core i7-4702MQ versus DDR4-3200 on the Ryzen 5 3600 — the Ryzen 5 3600 supports 100% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Ryzen 5 3600 supports up to 128 GB of RAM compared to 32 GB 300% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 16 (Core i7-4702MQ) vs 24 (Ryzen 5 3600) — the Ryzen 5 3600 offers 8 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: HM86,QM87 (Core i7-4702MQ) and AMD B550,AMD X570,AMD B450,AMD X470 (Ryzen 5 3600).

FeatureCore i7-4702MQRyzen 5 3600
Socket
PGA946
AM4
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0
PCIe 4.0+33%
Max RAM Speed
DDR3L-1600
DDR4-3200+100%
Max RAM Capacity
32 GB
128 GB+300%
RAM Channels
2
2
ECC Support
No
No
PCIe Lanes
16
24+50%
🔧

Advanced Features

Only the Ryzen 5 3600 has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Core i7-4702MQ) vs Yes (Ryzen 5 3600). The Core i7-4702MQ includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics 4600), while the Ryzen 5 3600 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i7-4702MQ targets Gaming, Ryzen 5 3600 targets Gaming/Budget Workstation. Direct competitor: Core i7-4702MQ rivals Ryzen 7 3750H; Ryzen 5 3600 rivals Core i5-10400.

FeatureCore i7-4702MQRyzen 5 3600
Integrated GPU
Yes
No
IGPU Model
HD Graphics 4600
Unlocked
No
Yes
AVX-512
No
No
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d
Yes
Target Use
Gaming
Gaming/Budget Workstation
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Core i7-4702MQ was priced at $383, while the Ryzen 5 3600 came in at $199. On launch pricing ($383 vs $199), Ryzen 5 3600 was $184 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i7-4702MQ delivers 13.5 pts/$ vs 88.9 pts/$ for the Ryzen 5 3600 — making the Ryzen 5 3600 the 147.1% better value option.

FeatureCore i7-4702MQRyzen 5 3600
MSRP
$383
$199-48%
Performance per Dollar
13.5
88.9+559%
Release Date
2013
2019

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.