Core i7-4790T vs FX-9370

Core i7-4790T vs FX-9370 Performance Spectrum

Core i7-4790T

4 / 8

6,325

0.0%

6,374

+0.8%

Ryzen Embedded V1202B

Ryzen Embedded R1606G

FX-8320E

Ryzen 3 PRO 2300U

Ryzen Threadripper 2920X

Ryzen 9 5900XT

Ryzen Threadripper 3970X

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i7-4790T vs FX-9370 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i7-4790T vs FX-9370: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i7-4790T

2014

Why buy it

✅Draws 45W instead of 220W, a 175W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than FX-9370 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (6,325 vs 6,374).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 20.9 vs 151.8 PassMark/$ ($303 MSRP vs $42 MSRP).

FX-9370

2013

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +14.4% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Costs $261 less on MSRP ($42 MSRP vs $303 MSRP).
✅Delivers 627.0% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 151.8 vs 20.9 PassMark/$ ($42 MSRP vs $303 MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌388.9% higher power demand at 220W vs 45W.

Quick Answers

So, is FX-9370 better than Core i7-4790T?

Yes. FX-9370 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 14.4% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data and 0.8% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, FX-9370 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 14.4% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, FX-9370 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.8% better PassMark, backed by 8 cores and 8 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

FX-9370 is the better buy right now. FX-9370 comes in $261 cheaper on MSRP at $42 MSRP versus $303 MSRP, and it still gives you a 14.4% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 627.0% better value on MSRP (151.8 vs 20.9 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i7-4790T makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2014 vs 2013). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Core i7-4790T vs FX-9370 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i7-4790T

The Core i7-4790T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 May 2014 (11 years ago). It is based on the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.7 GHz, with boost up to 3.9 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1150. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 6,325 points. Launch price was $303.

FX-9370

The FX-9370 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 6 July 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Vishera (2012−2015) architecture. It features 8 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 4.4 GHz, with boost up to 4.7 GHz. L2 cache: 8192 kB. Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: AM3+. Thermal design power (TDP): 220 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 6,374 points. Launch price was $149.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i7-4790T packs 4 cores / 8 threads, while the FX-9370 offers 8 cores / 8 threads — the FX-9370 has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.9 GHz on the Core i7-4790T versus 4.7 GHz on the FX-9370 — a 18.6% clock advantage for the FX-9370 (base: 2.7 GHz vs 4.4 GHz). The Core i7-4790T uses the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture (22 nm), while the FX-9370 uses Vishera (2012−2015) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-4790T scores 6,325 against the FX-9370's 6,374 — a 0.8% lead for the FX-9370.

Feature	Core i7-4790T	FX-9370
Cores / Threads	4 / 8	8 / 8+100%
Boost Clock	3.9 GHz	4.7 GHz+21%
Base Clock	2.7 GHz	4.4 GHz+63%
L3 Cache	8 MB (total)	—
L2 Cache	256 kB (per core)	8192 kB+3100%
Process	22 nm-31%	32 nm
Architecture	Haswell (2013−2015)	Vishera (2012−2015)
PassMark	6,325	6,374

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i7-4790T uses the LGA1150 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the FX-9370 uses AM3+ (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Core i7-4790T	FX-9370
Socket	LGA1150	AM3+
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0+50%	PCIe 2.0

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Core i7-4790T was priced at $303, while the FX-9370 came in at $42. On launch pricing ($303 vs $42), FX-9370 was $261 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i7-4790T delivers 20.9 pts/$ vs 151.8 pts/$ for the FX-9370 — making the FX-9370 the 151.6% better value option.

Feature	Core i7-4790T	FX-9370
MSRP	$303	$42-86%
Performance per Dollar	20.9	151.8+626%
Release Date	2014	2013

Search Core i7-4790T on Amazon

Search FX-9370 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.