Core i7-7567U vs FX-6200

Core i7-7567U vs FX-6200 Performance Spectrum

Core i7-7567U

2 / 4

4,095

0.0%

Celeron G4930T

Celeron Dual-Core T1400

4,114

+0.5%

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i7-7567U vs FX-6200 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i7-7567U vs FX-6200: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i7-7567U

2017

Why buy it

✅Draws 28W instead of 125W, a 97W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than FX-6200 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (4,095 vs 4,114).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (4 MB vs 8 MB).

FX-6200

2012

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +3.9% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+100% larger total L3 cache (8 MB vs 4 MB).

Trade-offs

❌Launch MSRP is still $169 MSRP, while Core i7-7567U mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌346.4% higher power demand at 125W vs 28W.

Quick Answers

So, is FX-6200 better than Core i7-7567U?

Yes. FX-6200 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 3.9% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data and 0.5% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, FX-6200 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 3.9% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, FX-6200 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.5% better PassMark, backed by 6 cores and 6 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 100% larger total L3 cache (8 MB vs 4 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

FX-6200 is the better buy right now. FX-6200 comes in at an unclear MSRP at $169 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 3.9% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (24.3 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i7-7567U makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2017 vs 2012). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Core i7-7567U vs FX-6200 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i7-7567U

The Core i7-7567U is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 January 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Kaby Lake (2016−2019) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1356. Thermal design power (TDP): 28 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 4,095 points. Launch price was $415.

FX-6200

The FX-6200 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 27 February 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Zambezi (2011−2012) architecture. It features 6 cores and 6 threads. Base frequency is 3.8 GHz, with boost up to 4.1 GHz. L3 cache: 8192 kB. L2 cache: 6144 kB. Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: AM3+. Thermal design power (TDP): 125 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 4,114 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i7-7567U packs 2 cores / 4 threads, while the FX-6200 offers 6 cores / 6 threads — the FX-6200 has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4 GHz on the Core i7-7567U versus 4.1 GHz on the FX-6200 — a 2.5% clock advantage for the FX-6200 (base: 3.5 GHz vs 3.8 GHz). The Core i7-7567U uses the Kaby Lake (2016−2019) architecture (14 nm), while the FX-6200 uses Zambezi (2011−2012) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-7567U scores 4,095 against the FX-6200's 4,114 — a 0.5% lead for the FX-6200. L3 cache: 4 MB on the Core i7-7567U vs 8192 kB on the FX-6200.

Feature	Core i7-7567U	FX-6200
Cores / Threads	2 / 4	6 / 6+200%
Boost Clock	4 GHz	4.1 GHz+2%
Base Clock	3.5 GHz	3.8 GHz+9%
L3 Cache	4 MB	8192 kB+100%
L2 Cache	512 kB	6144 kB+1100%
Process	14 nm-56%	32 nm
Architecture	Kaby Lake (2016−2019)	Zambezi (2011−2012)
PassMark	4,095	4,114

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i7-7567U uses the BGA1356 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the FX-6200 uses AM3+ (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.