Core i7-7567U vs Opteron 3365

Core i7-7567U vs Opteron 3365 Performance Spectrum

Core i7-7567U

2 / 4

4,095

0.0%

Celeron G4930T

Celeron Dual-Core T1400

4,125

+0.7%

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i7-7567U vs Opteron 3365 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i7-7567U vs Opteron 3365: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i7-7567U

2017

Why buy it

✅Draws 28W instead of 65W, a 37W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Opteron 3365 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (4,095 vs 4,125).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (4 MB vs 8 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Opteron 3365, which brings 8 cores / 8 threads.

Opteron 3365

2013

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +10.2% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+100% larger total L3 cache (8 MB vs 4 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 8 cores / 8 threads.

Trade-offs

❌132.1% higher power demand at 65W vs 28W.

Quick Answers

So, is Opteron 3365 better than Core i7-7567U?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Opteron 3365 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Core i7-7567U is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Opteron 3365 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 10.2% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Opteron 3365 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.7% better PassMark, backed by 8 cores and 8 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 100% larger total L3 cache (8 MB vs 4 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Opteron 3365 still makes the most sense overall. Opteron 3365 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 10.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i7-7567U makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2017 vs 2013). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Core i7-7567U vs Opteron 3365 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i7-7567U

The Core i7-7567U is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 January 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Kaby Lake (2016−2019) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1356. Thermal design power (TDP): 28 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 4,095 points. Launch price was $415.

Opteron 3365

The Opteron 3365 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Delhi (2012−2013) architecture. It features 8 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.3 GHz, with boost up to 3.3 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 4 MB. Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: AM3+. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 4,125 points. Launch price was $800.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i7-7567U packs 2 cores / 4 threads, while the Opteron 3365 offers 8 cores / 8 threads — the Opteron 3365 has 6 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4 GHz on the Core i7-7567U versus 3.3 GHz on the Opteron 3365 — a 19.2% clock advantage for the Core i7-7567U (base: 3.5 GHz vs 2.3 GHz). The Core i7-7567U uses the Kaby Lake (2016−2019) architecture (14 nm), while the Opteron 3365 uses Delhi (2012−2013) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-7567U scores 4,095 against the Opteron 3365's 4,125 — a 0.7% lead for the Opteron 3365. L3 cache: 4 MB on the Core i7-7567U vs 8 MB (total) on the Opteron 3365.

Feature	Core i7-7567U	Opteron 3365
Cores / Threads	2 / 4	8 / 8+300%
Boost Clock	4 GHz+21%	3.3 GHz
Base Clock	3.5 GHz+52%	2.3 GHz
L3 Cache	4 MB	8 MB (total)+100%
L2 Cache	512 kB	4 MB+700%
Process	14 nm-56%	32 nm
Architecture	Kaby Lake (2016−2019)	Delhi (2012−2013)
PassMark	4,095	4,125

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i7-7567U uses the BGA1356 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Opteron 3365 uses AM3+ (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.