Core i7-7567U vs FX-6300

Core i7-7567U vs FX-6300 Performance Spectrum

Core i7-7567U

2 / 4

4,095

0.0%

Celeron G4930T

Celeron Dual-Core T1400

4,137

+1.0%

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i7-7567U vs FX-6300 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i7-7567U vs FX-6300: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i7-7567U

2017

Why buy it

✅Draws 28W instead of 95W, a 67W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (4,095 vs 4,137).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (4 MB vs 8 MB).
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike FX-6300.

FX-6300

2012

Why buy it

✅+1% higher PassMark.
✅+100% larger total L3 cache (8 MB vs 4 MB).
✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Core i7-7567U.

Trade-offs

❌Launch MSRP is still $132 MSRP, while Core i7-7567U mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌239.3% higher power demand at 95W vs 28W.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i7-7567U better than FX-6300?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Core i7-7567U is ahead with a 1.4% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, FX-6300 pulls ahead with 1% better PassMark. FX-6300 also has the bigger cache pool with 100% larger total L3 cache (8 MB vs 4 MB).

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, FX-6300 is the stronger fit. You are getting 1% better PassMark, backed by 6 cores and 6 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 100% larger total L3 cache (8 MB vs 4 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i7-7567U is still the much better call for a fresh build. Core i7-7567U comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $132 MSRP, and it still gives you a 1.4% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. FX-6300 only looks stronger on raw value math because it is extremely cheap, but that usually means used-market pricing on an obsolete 2012 platform. Even with 100.0% better value on paper (31.3 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), it really only makes sense as a cheap stopgap or a niche existing-platform option for someone already on AM3+.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i7-7567U makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2017 vs 2012). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Core i7-7567U vs FX-6300 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i7-7567U

The Core i7-7567U is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 January 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Kaby Lake (2016−2019) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1356. Thermal design power (TDP): 28 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 4,095 points. Launch price was $415.

FX-6300

The FX-6300 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 23 October 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Vishera (2012−2015) architecture. It features 6 cores and 6 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 3.8 GHz. L3 cache: 8192 kB. L2 cache: 6144 kB. Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: AM3+. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-1866. Passmark benchmark score: 4,137 points. Launch price was $132.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i7-7567U packs 2 cores / 4 threads, while the FX-6300 offers 6 cores / 6 threads — the FX-6300 has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4 GHz on the Core i7-7567U versus 3.8 GHz on the FX-6300 — a 5.1% clock advantage for the Core i7-7567U (base: 3.5 GHz vs 3.5 GHz). The Core i7-7567U uses the Kaby Lake (2016−2019) architecture (14 nm), while the FX-6300 uses Vishera (2012−2015) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-7567U scores 4,095 against the FX-6300's 4,137 — a 1% lead for the FX-6300. L3 cache: 4 MB on the Core i7-7567U vs 8192 kB on the FX-6300.

Feature	Core i7-7567U	FX-6300
Cores / Threads	2 / 4	6 / 6+200%
Boost Clock	4 GHz+5%	3.8 GHz
Base Clock	3.5 GHz	3.5 GHz
L3 Cache	4 MB	8192 kB+100%
L2 Cache	512 kB	6144 kB+1100%
Process	14 nm-56%	32 nm
Architecture	Kaby Lake (2016−2019)	Vishera (2012−2015)
PassMark	4,095	4,137+1%
Geekbench 6 Single	—	534

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i7-7567U uses the BGA1356 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the FX-6300 uses AM3+ (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.