Core i7-7567U vs Xeon E3-1260L

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i7-7567U vs Xeon E3-1260L FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i7-7567U vs Xeon E3-1260L: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i7-7567U

2017

Why buy it

✅+0.5% higher PassMark.
✅Draws 28W instead of 45W, a 17W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon E3-1260L across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Smaller total L3 cache (4 MB vs 8 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon E3-1260L, which brings 4 cores / 8 threads.

Xeon E3-1260L

2011

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +7.0% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+100% larger total L3 cache (8 MB vs 4 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 4 cores / 8 threads.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (4,076 vs 4,095).
❌Launch MSRP is still $294 MSRP, while Core i7-7567U mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌60.7% higher power demand at 45W vs 28W.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i7-7567U better than Xeon E3-1260L?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon E3-1260L makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Core i7-7567U is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i7-7567U is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.5% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i7-7567U is still the faster CPU overall, but Xeon E3-1260L is easier to justify if budget matters more than peak performance. Core i7-7567U comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $294 MSRP, and it still gives you 0.5% better PassMark. The compromise is that Xeon E3-1260L is still the better pure gaming CPU with a 7.0% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Xeon E3-1260L is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (13.9 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), which is why it can still make sense for tighter-budget builds on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i7-7567U makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2017 vs 2011) and more multi-core headroom with 2 cores / 4 threads instead of 4/8. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Core i7-7567U vs Xeon E3-1260L Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i7-7567U

The Core i7-7567U is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 January 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Kaby Lake (2016−2019) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1356. Thermal design power (TDP): 28 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 4,095 points. Launch price was $415.

Xeon E3-1260L

The Xeon E3-1260L is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 April 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 3.3 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1155. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 4,076 points. Launch price was $150.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i7-7567U packs 2 cores / 4 threads, while the Xeon E3-1260L offers 4 cores / 8 threads — the Xeon E3-1260L has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4 GHz on the Core i7-7567U versus 3.3 GHz on the Xeon E3-1260L — a 19.2% clock advantage for the Core i7-7567U (base: 3.5 GHz vs 2.4 GHz). The Core i7-7567U uses the Kaby Lake (2016−2019) architecture (14 nm), while the Xeon E3-1260L uses Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-7567U scores 4,095 against the Xeon E3-1260L's 4,076 — a 0.5% lead for the Core i7-7567U. L3 cache: 4 MB on the Core i7-7567U vs 8 MB (total) on the Xeon E3-1260L.

Feature	Core i7-7567U	Xeon E3-1260L
Cores / Threads	2 / 4	4 / 8+100%
Boost Clock	4 GHz+21%	3.3 GHz
Base Clock	3.5 GHz+46%	2.4 GHz
L3 Cache	4 MB	8 MB (total)+100%
L2 Cache	512 kB+100%	256 kB (per core)
Process	14 nm-56%	32 nm
Architecture	Kaby Lake (2016−2019)	Sandy Bridge (2011−2013)
PassMark	4,095	4,076

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i7-7567U uses the BGA1356 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon E3-1260L uses LGA1155 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.